压力管理能力指标工具的心理测量分析。

T Dulal-Arthur, J Hassard, W Wang, J Yarker, L Thomson, H Blake
{"title":"压力管理能力指标工具的心理测量分析。","authors":"T Dulal-Arthur, J Hassard, W Wang, J Yarker, L Thomson, H Blake","doi":"10.1093/occmed/kqaf028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Work-related stress is a growing concern in the UK, negatively impacting both employee well-being and organizational effectiveness. Addressing work-related stress through effective managerial practices is essential, however, existing tools are often lengthy and impractical for routine use.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>The study aimed to develop and validate a shortened version of the 36-item Stress Management Competency Indicator Tool (SMCIT) to enhance its practicality and relevance to changing working practices, while maintaining reliability and validity in assessing stress management competencies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A secondary data analysis was undertaken using data from 224 line managers across 12 organizations. Principle component analysis was applied to reduce the SMCIT from 36 to 19 items. Psychometric analysis, including Cronbach's alpha, factor loadings and total variance explained, was used to ensure the shortened tool retained its measurement rigour.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 19-item SMCIT retained four latent constructs: respectful/ responsible, managing the individual within the team, conflict/problem management and organizational resources. The revised tool explained 46% of the variance, compared to 37% for the original, and showed factor loadings ranging from point 0.43 to 0.86. Reliability scores ranged from 0.65 to 0.69, indicating moderate internal consistency. We conclude that the shortened tool enhances measurement efficiency by removing redundant items, while maintaining key competencies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The shortened SMCIT is a reliable and practical tool for evaluating line management competencies, reducing response burden while improving data quality and relevance to hybrid working. We recommend further validation through confirmatory factor analysis and expert review to enhance its application in occupational settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":520727,"journal":{"name":"Occupational medicine (Oxford, England)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A psychometric analysis of the Stress Management Competency Indicator Tool.\",\"authors\":\"T Dulal-Arthur, J Hassard, W Wang, J Yarker, L Thomson, H Blake\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/occmed/kqaf028\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Work-related stress is a growing concern in the UK, negatively impacting both employee well-being and organizational effectiveness. Addressing work-related stress through effective managerial practices is essential, however, existing tools are often lengthy and impractical for routine use.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>The study aimed to develop and validate a shortened version of the 36-item Stress Management Competency Indicator Tool (SMCIT) to enhance its practicality and relevance to changing working practices, while maintaining reliability and validity in assessing stress management competencies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A secondary data analysis was undertaken using data from 224 line managers across 12 organizations. Principle component analysis was applied to reduce the SMCIT from 36 to 19 items. Psychometric analysis, including Cronbach's alpha, factor loadings and total variance explained, was used to ensure the shortened tool retained its measurement rigour.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 19-item SMCIT retained four latent constructs: respectful/ responsible, managing the individual within the team, conflict/problem management and organizational resources. The revised tool explained 46% of the variance, compared to 37% for the original, and showed factor loadings ranging from point 0.43 to 0.86. Reliability scores ranged from 0.65 to 0.69, indicating moderate internal consistency. We conclude that the shortened tool enhances measurement efficiency by removing redundant items, while maintaining key competencies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The shortened SMCIT is a reliable and practical tool for evaluating line management competencies, reducing response burden while improving data quality and relevance to hybrid working. We recommend further validation through confirmatory factor analysis and expert review to enhance its application in occupational settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520727,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Occupational medicine (Oxford, England)\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Occupational medicine (Oxford, England)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqaf028\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Occupational medicine (Oxford, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqaf028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:与工作相关的压力在英国越来越受到关注,对员工的幸福感和组织效率都产生了负面影响。通过有效的管理实践来解决与工作相关的压力是必要的,然而,现有的工具对于日常使用来说往往是冗长和不切实际的。目的:本研究旨在开发和验证一套精简版的压力管理能力指标工具(SMCIT),以提高其实用性和与工作实践变化的相关性,同时保持评估压力管理能力的信度和效度。方法:采用来自12个组织的224位直线经理的数据进行二次数据分析。应用主成分分析将SMCIT从36个项目减少到19个项目。使用心理测量分析,包括Cronbach's alpha、因子负荷和总方差解释,以确保缩短的工具保持其测量严谨性。结果:19项SMCIT测验保留了4个潜在构式:尊重/负责、团队内部个人管理、冲突/问题管理和组织资源。修正后的工具解释了46%的方差,而原始工具解释了37%,并显示因子负荷范围从0.43到0.86。信度得分在0.65 ~ 0.69之间,表明内部一致性中等。我们得出结论,缩短的工具通过去除冗余项来提高测量效率,同时保持关键能力。结论:缩短的SMCIT是一种可靠实用的工具,可用于评估一线管理能力,减少响应负担,同时提高数据质量和与混合工作的相关性。我们建议通过验证性因子分析和专家评审进一步验证,以加强其在职业环境中的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A psychometric analysis of the Stress Management Competency Indicator Tool.

Background: Work-related stress is a growing concern in the UK, negatively impacting both employee well-being and organizational effectiveness. Addressing work-related stress through effective managerial practices is essential, however, existing tools are often lengthy and impractical for routine use.

Aims: The study aimed to develop and validate a shortened version of the 36-item Stress Management Competency Indicator Tool (SMCIT) to enhance its practicality and relevance to changing working practices, while maintaining reliability and validity in assessing stress management competencies.

Methods: A secondary data analysis was undertaken using data from 224 line managers across 12 organizations. Principle component analysis was applied to reduce the SMCIT from 36 to 19 items. Psychometric analysis, including Cronbach's alpha, factor loadings and total variance explained, was used to ensure the shortened tool retained its measurement rigour.

Results: The 19-item SMCIT retained four latent constructs: respectful/ responsible, managing the individual within the team, conflict/problem management and organizational resources. The revised tool explained 46% of the variance, compared to 37% for the original, and showed factor loadings ranging from point 0.43 to 0.86. Reliability scores ranged from 0.65 to 0.69, indicating moderate internal consistency. We conclude that the shortened tool enhances measurement efficiency by removing redundant items, while maintaining key competencies.

Conclusions: The shortened SMCIT is a reliable and practical tool for evaluating line management competencies, reducing response burden while improving data quality and relevance to hybrid working. We recommend further validation through confirmatory factor analysis and expert review to enhance its application in occupational settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信