局部脉冲场消融治疗心房颤动和非典型扑动的一年疗效。

IF 2.6
Sebastian Weyand, Viola Adam, Paloma Biehler, Patricia Hägele, Simon Hanger, Stephanie Löbig, Andrei Pinchuk, Felix Ausbuettel, Christian Waechter, Peter Seizer
{"title":"局部脉冲场消融治疗心房颤动和非典型扑动的一年疗效。","authors":"Sebastian Weyand, Viola Adam, Paloma Biehler, Patricia Hägele, Simon Hanger, Stephanie Löbig, Andrei Pinchuk, Felix Ausbuettel, Christian Waechter, Peter Seizer","doi":"10.1007/s10840-025-02079-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Redo ablation procedures are frequently required in patients with recurrent atrial fibrillation (AF) and atypical atrial flutter following initial pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). While focal pulsed-field ablation (PFA) has emerged as a promising nonthermal alternative, data on its long-term efficacy and safety in redo procedures remain limited. This study evaluates the 1-year outcomes of focal PFA in redo ablations for AF and atypical flutter, focusing on arrhythmia recurrence, procedural success, and safety.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on 54 patients undergoing redo ablation with focal PFA at a single center. Procedural endpoints included acute and chronic procedural success, additional ablation line integrity, and complication rates. Arrhythmia recurrence was assessed via ECG and 24-h Holter monitoring at 6 and 12 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Complete PVI and bidirectional block of all additional ablation lines were confirmed in all cases at the end of the procedure. During the 1-year follow-up, 29.63% of patients experienced arrhythmia recurrence. Among patients undergoing a further redo ablation, reconnections were most frequently observed in the anterior mitral line, suggesting challenges in lesion durability in this region. The overall complication rate was low (1.85%), with one case of coronary vasospasm during cavotricuspid isthmus ablation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Focal PFA appears to be a feasible and safe option for redo ablations in AF and atypical flutter, with high acute success rates and acceptable arrhythmia control at 1 year. However, lesion durability, especially for complex lines, remains a limitation, underscoring the need for optimization and further prospective evaluation against thermal ablation.</p>","PeriodicalId":520675,"journal":{"name":"Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing","volume":" ","pages":"1625-1636"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"One-year outcomes of focal pulsed-field ablation for redo procedures in atrial fibrillation and atypical flutter.\",\"authors\":\"Sebastian Weyand, Viola Adam, Paloma Biehler, Patricia Hägele, Simon Hanger, Stephanie Löbig, Andrei Pinchuk, Felix Ausbuettel, Christian Waechter, Peter Seizer\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10840-025-02079-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Redo ablation procedures are frequently required in patients with recurrent atrial fibrillation (AF) and atypical atrial flutter following initial pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). While focal pulsed-field ablation (PFA) has emerged as a promising nonthermal alternative, data on its long-term efficacy and safety in redo procedures remain limited. This study evaluates the 1-year outcomes of focal PFA in redo ablations for AF and atypical flutter, focusing on arrhythmia recurrence, procedural success, and safety.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on 54 patients undergoing redo ablation with focal PFA at a single center. Procedural endpoints included acute and chronic procedural success, additional ablation line integrity, and complication rates. Arrhythmia recurrence was assessed via ECG and 24-h Holter monitoring at 6 and 12 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Complete PVI and bidirectional block of all additional ablation lines were confirmed in all cases at the end of the procedure. During the 1-year follow-up, 29.63% of patients experienced arrhythmia recurrence. Among patients undergoing a further redo ablation, reconnections were most frequently observed in the anterior mitral line, suggesting challenges in lesion durability in this region. The overall complication rate was low (1.85%), with one case of coronary vasospasm during cavotricuspid isthmus ablation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Focal PFA appears to be a feasible and safe option for redo ablations in AF and atypical flutter, with high acute success rates and acceptable arrhythmia control at 1 year. However, lesion durability, especially for complex lines, remains a limitation, underscoring the need for optimization and further prospective evaluation against thermal ablation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520675,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1625-1636\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-025-02079-8\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-025-02079-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:初始肺静脉隔离(PVI)后复发性心房颤动(AF)和非典型心房扑动的患者经常需要重新消融手术。虽然焦点脉冲场消融(PFA)已成为一种很有前途的非热替代方法,但其在重做过程中的长期有效性和安全性数据仍然有限。本研究评估局灶性PFA在房颤和非典型扑动再消融中的1年预后,重点关注心律失常复发、手术成功和安全性。方法:回顾性分析54例单中心局灶性PFA再消融患者的临床资料。手术终点包括急性和慢性手术成功、额外消融线完整性和并发症发生率。6个月和12个月时通过心电图和24小时动态心电图监测评估心律失常复发情况。结果:在手术结束时,所有病例都确认了所有额外消融线的完全PVI和双向阻断。在1年的随访中,29.63%的患者出现心律失常复发。在接受进一步消融的患者中,在二尖瓣前线最常观察到重新连接,这表明该区域的病变持久性存在挑战。总并发症发生率低(1.85%),1例发生冠状血管痉挛。结论:局灶性PFA似乎是房颤和非典型扑动患者再次消融的一种可行和安全的选择,具有高的急性成功率和1年可接受的心律失常控制。然而,病变的耐久性,特别是对于复杂的线路,仍然是一个限制,强调需要优化和对热消融的进一步前瞻性评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
One-year outcomes of focal pulsed-field ablation for redo procedures in atrial fibrillation and atypical flutter.

Background: Redo ablation procedures are frequently required in patients with recurrent atrial fibrillation (AF) and atypical atrial flutter following initial pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). While focal pulsed-field ablation (PFA) has emerged as a promising nonthermal alternative, data on its long-term efficacy and safety in redo procedures remain limited. This study evaluates the 1-year outcomes of focal PFA in redo ablations for AF and atypical flutter, focusing on arrhythmia recurrence, procedural success, and safety.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 54 patients undergoing redo ablation with focal PFA at a single center. Procedural endpoints included acute and chronic procedural success, additional ablation line integrity, and complication rates. Arrhythmia recurrence was assessed via ECG and 24-h Holter monitoring at 6 and 12 months.

Results: Complete PVI and bidirectional block of all additional ablation lines were confirmed in all cases at the end of the procedure. During the 1-year follow-up, 29.63% of patients experienced arrhythmia recurrence. Among patients undergoing a further redo ablation, reconnections were most frequently observed in the anterior mitral line, suggesting challenges in lesion durability in this region. The overall complication rate was low (1.85%), with one case of coronary vasospasm during cavotricuspid isthmus ablation.

Conclusion: Focal PFA appears to be a feasible and safe option for redo ablations in AF and atypical flutter, with high acute success rates and acceptable arrhythmia control at 1 year. However, lesion durability, especially for complex lines, remains a limitation, underscoring the need for optimization and further prospective evaluation against thermal ablation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信