股骨颈骨折后患者行全髋关节置换术的时间至最小临床重要差异:一项倾向评分匹配研究。

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Jacob S Borgida, Perry Lim, Lara L Cohen, Nicholas Sauder, Thuan V Ly, Hany S Bedair, Christopher M Melnic
{"title":"股骨颈骨折后患者行全髋关节置换术的时间至最小临床重要差异:一项倾向评分匹配研究。","authors":"Jacob S Borgida, Perry Lim, Lara L Cohen, Nicholas Sauder, Thuan V Ly, Hany S Bedair, Christopher M Melnic","doi":"10.5435/JAAOS-D-24-01493","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Conversion total hip arthroplasty (cTHA) is commonly used for patients with persistent osteoarthritis or failed fixation following femoral neck fracture (FNF). There are limited data comparing patient-reported outcomes between patients undergoing cTHA after FNF and primary THA (pTHA) patients. This study aimed to compare the time to reach the minimal clinically important difference for improvement (MCID) for the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcomes Score-Physical Function Short Form, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Global Physical, and PROMIS Physical Function short form 10a (PF-10a).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients undergoing cTHA for FNF between 2016 and 2022 were identified from an institutional database and propensity score matched 1:4 to pTHA patients by age, sex, body mass index, and Charlson Comorbidity Index. Demographic and MCID achievement rates were compared. To assess the time to achieve MCID, survival curves with and without interval censoring were used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 258 THAs (52 FNF cTHA and 206 pTHA) were analyzed. All FNFs were managed surgically. The rate of achieving MCID was similar between the FNF cTHA and pTHA cohorts for all three PROMs. For PROMIS PF-10a, FNF cTHA had a markedly longer median time to MCID at 9.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 6.5 to 12.1) compared with 4.2 months (95% CI, 3.3 to 6.0) for pTHA (P < 0.001). Interval censoring revealed that FNF cTHA achieved MCID for PROMIS PF-10a between 5.07 and 5.34 months, whereas pTHA achieved MCID between 1.37 and 1.37 months (P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The time to achieve MCID was markedly slower for FNF cTHA patients compared with pTHA patients. This delay in achieving MCID should be factored into shared decision-making discussions to enhance preoperative expectation management and patient education. Future research is needed to identify modifiable factors that could improve recovery outcomes for FNF cTHA patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":51098,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Time to Minimal Clinically Important Difference in Patients Undergoing Conversion Total Hip Arthroplasty After Femoral Neck Fracture: A Propensity Score Matched Study.\",\"authors\":\"Jacob S Borgida, Perry Lim, Lara L Cohen, Nicholas Sauder, Thuan V Ly, Hany S Bedair, Christopher M Melnic\",\"doi\":\"10.5435/JAAOS-D-24-01493\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Conversion total hip arthroplasty (cTHA) is commonly used for patients with persistent osteoarthritis or failed fixation following femoral neck fracture (FNF). There are limited data comparing patient-reported outcomes between patients undergoing cTHA after FNF and primary THA (pTHA) patients. This study aimed to compare the time to reach the minimal clinically important difference for improvement (MCID) for the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcomes Score-Physical Function Short Form, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Global Physical, and PROMIS Physical Function short form 10a (PF-10a).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients undergoing cTHA for FNF between 2016 and 2022 were identified from an institutional database and propensity score matched 1:4 to pTHA patients by age, sex, body mass index, and Charlson Comorbidity Index. Demographic and MCID achievement rates were compared. To assess the time to achieve MCID, survival curves with and without interval censoring were used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 258 THAs (52 FNF cTHA and 206 pTHA) were analyzed. All FNFs were managed surgically. The rate of achieving MCID was similar between the FNF cTHA and pTHA cohorts for all three PROMs. For PROMIS PF-10a, FNF cTHA had a markedly longer median time to MCID at 9.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 6.5 to 12.1) compared with 4.2 months (95% CI, 3.3 to 6.0) for pTHA (P < 0.001). Interval censoring revealed that FNF cTHA achieved MCID for PROMIS PF-10a between 5.07 and 5.34 months, whereas pTHA achieved MCID between 1.37 and 1.37 months (P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The time to achieve MCID was markedly slower for FNF cTHA patients compared with pTHA patients. This delay in achieving MCID should be factored into shared decision-making discussions to enhance preoperative expectation management and patient education. Future research is needed to identify modifiable factors that could improve recovery outcomes for FNF cTHA patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51098,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-24-01493\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-24-01493","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:置换全髋关节置换术(cTHA)常用于股骨颈骨折(FNF)后持续性骨关节炎或固定失败的患者。比较FNF术后行cTHA和原发性THA (pTHA)患者之间的患者报告结果的数据有限。本研究旨在比较髋关节残疾和骨关节炎结局评分-身体功能简表、患者报告的结果测量信息系统(PROMIS)全球物理和PROMIS身体功能简表10a (f -10a)达到最小临床重要改善差异(MCID)的时间。方法:从机构数据库中确定2016年至2022年间因FNF接受cTHA治疗的患者,并根据年龄、性别、体重指数和Charlson合并症指数对pTHA患者进行1:4匹配的倾向评分。比较人口统计学和MCID的成功率。为了评估达到MCID的时间,使用了有和没有间隔切除的生存曲线。结果:共分析258个tha (FNF - cTHA 52个,pTHA 206个)。所有fnf均行手术治疗。FNF - cTHA组和pTHA组在所有三个PROMs中实现MCID的比率相似。对于PROMIS PF-10a, FNF - cTHA到MCID的中位时间明显更长,为9.8个月(95%可信区间[CI], 6.5至12.1),而pTHA为4.2个月(95% CI, 3.3至6.0)(P < 0.001)。间隔筛选显示,FNF - cTHA在5.07 ~ 5.34个月之间达到PROMIS pf10a的MCID,而pTHA在1.37 ~ 1.37个月之间达到MCID (P < 0.001)。结论:与pTHA患者相比,FNF - cTHA患者达到MCID的时间明显较慢。实现MCID的延迟应纳入共同决策讨论,以加强术前期望管理和患者教育。未来的研究需要确定可以改善FNF - cTHA患者恢复结果的可改变因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Time to Minimal Clinically Important Difference in Patients Undergoing Conversion Total Hip Arthroplasty After Femoral Neck Fracture: A Propensity Score Matched Study.

Background: Conversion total hip arthroplasty (cTHA) is commonly used for patients with persistent osteoarthritis or failed fixation following femoral neck fracture (FNF). There are limited data comparing patient-reported outcomes between patients undergoing cTHA after FNF and primary THA (pTHA) patients. This study aimed to compare the time to reach the minimal clinically important difference for improvement (MCID) for the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcomes Score-Physical Function Short Form, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Global Physical, and PROMIS Physical Function short form 10a (PF-10a).

Methods: Patients undergoing cTHA for FNF between 2016 and 2022 were identified from an institutional database and propensity score matched 1:4 to pTHA patients by age, sex, body mass index, and Charlson Comorbidity Index. Demographic and MCID achievement rates were compared. To assess the time to achieve MCID, survival curves with and without interval censoring were used.

Results: A total of 258 THAs (52 FNF cTHA and 206 pTHA) were analyzed. All FNFs were managed surgically. The rate of achieving MCID was similar between the FNF cTHA and pTHA cohorts for all three PROMs. For PROMIS PF-10a, FNF cTHA had a markedly longer median time to MCID at 9.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 6.5 to 12.1) compared with 4.2 months (95% CI, 3.3 to 6.0) for pTHA (P < 0.001). Interval censoring revealed that FNF cTHA achieved MCID for PROMIS PF-10a between 5.07 and 5.34 months, whereas pTHA achieved MCID between 1.37 and 1.37 months (P < 0.001).

Conclusion: The time to achieve MCID was markedly slower for FNF cTHA patients compared with pTHA patients. This delay in achieving MCID should be factored into shared decision-making discussions to enhance preoperative expectation management and patient education. Future research is needed to identify modifiable factors that could improve recovery outcomes for FNF cTHA patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
529
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons was established in the fall of 1993 by the Academy in response to its membership’s demand for a clinical review journal. Two issues were published the first year, followed by six issues yearly from 1994 through 2004. In September 2005, JAAOS began publishing monthly issues. Each issue includes richly illustrated peer-reviewed articles focused on clinical diagnosis and management. Special features in each issue provide commentary on developments in pharmacotherapeutics, materials and techniques, and computer applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信