{"title":"多模态扩散MRI与VI-RADS协同用于膀胱尿路上皮癌的精确分级:一种前瞻性诊断模型验证。","authors":"Xiaoxian Zhang, Shaoyu Wang, Mengzhu Wang, Lifeng Wang, Shouning Zhang, Xuejun Chen, Chunmiao Xu","doi":"10.1016/j.acra.2025.05.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Rationale and objectives: </strong>To evaluate the diagnostic performance of diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI), mean apparent propagator (MAP), neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging (NODDI), and the Vesical Imaging-Reporting and Data System (VI-RADS) in discriminating the pathological grade of bladder urothelial carcinoma (UCB).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This prospective study enrolled patients with pathologically confirmed UCB between May 2023 and December 2023. Preoperative MRI protocols included spin-echo echo-planner imaging (SE-EPI) and conventional DWI. Quantitative parameters from SE-EPI (DTI, DKI, MAP, NODDI) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values were measured. Group comparisons between low-grade and high-grade UCB were performed using t-tests or Mann-Whitney U tests. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis and DeLong's test were used to evaluate diagnostic performance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 50 patients with UCB (low-grade/ high-grade = 16/34) were included. VI-RADS score and mean kurtosis (MK) derived from DKI emerged as independent predictors for differentiating low-grade and high-grade UCB (area under the curve (AUC): 0.692 and 0.865, respectively). The combination of VI-RADS and DKI-MK achieved superior diagnostic performance (AUC: 0.915, sensitivity: 0.941) compared to VI-RADS alone (AUC: 0.692, sensitivity: 0.471; p < 0.001) or ADC alone (AUC: 0.787, sensitivity: 0.813; p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Integrating VI-RADS with DKI-MK significantly enhances preoperative assessment of UCB pathological grading, demonstrating higher accuracy and sensitivity than VI-RADS or ADC alone. This approach improves diagnostic objectivity by combining qualitative imaging criteria with quantitative diffusion metrics, offering potential clinical utility for treatment stratification.</p>","PeriodicalId":50928,"journal":{"name":"Academic Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multimodal Diffusion MRI Synergized with VI-RADS for Precision Grading of Bladder Urothelial Carcinoma: A Prospective Diagnostic Model Validation.\",\"authors\":\"Xiaoxian Zhang, Shaoyu Wang, Mengzhu Wang, Lifeng Wang, Shouning Zhang, Xuejun Chen, Chunmiao Xu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.acra.2025.05.014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Rationale and objectives: </strong>To evaluate the diagnostic performance of diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI), mean apparent propagator (MAP), neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging (NODDI), and the Vesical Imaging-Reporting and Data System (VI-RADS) in discriminating the pathological grade of bladder urothelial carcinoma (UCB).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This prospective study enrolled patients with pathologically confirmed UCB between May 2023 and December 2023. Preoperative MRI protocols included spin-echo echo-planner imaging (SE-EPI) and conventional DWI. Quantitative parameters from SE-EPI (DTI, DKI, MAP, NODDI) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values were measured. Group comparisons between low-grade and high-grade UCB were performed using t-tests or Mann-Whitney U tests. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis and DeLong's test were used to evaluate diagnostic performance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 50 patients with UCB (low-grade/ high-grade = 16/34) were included. VI-RADS score and mean kurtosis (MK) derived from DKI emerged as independent predictors for differentiating low-grade and high-grade UCB (area under the curve (AUC): 0.692 and 0.865, respectively). The combination of VI-RADS and DKI-MK achieved superior diagnostic performance (AUC: 0.915, sensitivity: 0.941) compared to VI-RADS alone (AUC: 0.692, sensitivity: 0.471; p < 0.001) or ADC alone (AUC: 0.787, sensitivity: 0.813; p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Integrating VI-RADS with DKI-MK significantly enhances preoperative assessment of UCB pathological grading, demonstrating higher accuracy and sensitivity than VI-RADS or ADC alone. This approach improves diagnostic objectivity by combining qualitative imaging criteria with quantitative diffusion metrics, offering potential clinical utility for treatment stratification.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50928,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Academic Radiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Academic Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2025.05.014\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2025.05.014","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Multimodal Diffusion MRI Synergized with VI-RADS for Precision Grading of Bladder Urothelial Carcinoma: A Prospective Diagnostic Model Validation.
Rationale and objectives: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI), mean apparent propagator (MAP), neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging (NODDI), and the Vesical Imaging-Reporting and Data System (VI-RADS) in discriminating the pathological grade of bladder urothelial carcinoma (UCB).
Materials and methods: This prospective study enrolled patients with pathologically confirmed UCB between May 2023 and December 2023. Preoperative MRI protocols included spin-echo echo-planner imaging (SE-EPI) and conventional DWI. Quantitative parameters from SE-EPI (DTI, DKI, MAP, NODDI) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values were measured. Group comparisons between low-grade and high-grade UCB were performed using t-tests or Mann-Whitney U tests. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis and DeLong's test were used to evaluate diagnostic performance.
Results: A total of 50 patients with UCB (low-grade/ high-grade = 16/34) were included. VI-RADS score and mean kurtosis (MK) derived from DKI emerged as independent predictors for differentiating low-grade and high-grade UCB (area under the curve (AUC): 0.692 and 0.865, respectively). The combination of VI-RADS and DKI-MK achieved superior diagnostic performance (AUC: 0.915, sensitivity: 0.941) compared to VI-RADS alone (AUC: 0.692, sensitivity: 0.471; p < 0.001) or ADC alone (AUC: 0.787, sensitivity: 0.813; p < 0.05).
Conclusion: Integrating VI-RADS with DKI-MK significantly enhances preoperative assessment of UCB pathological grading, demonstrating higher accuracy and sensitivity than VI-RADS or ADC alone. This approach improves diagnostic objectivity by combining qualitative imaging criteria with quantitative diffusion metrics, offering potential clinical utility for treatment stratification.
期刊介绍:
Academic Radiology publishes original reports of clinical and laboratory investigations in diagnostic imaging, the diagnostic use of radioactive isotopes, computed tomography, positron emission tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, digital subtraction angiography, image-guided interventions and related techniques. It also includes brief technical reports describing original observations, techniques, and instrumental developments; state-of-the-art reports on clinical issues, new technology and other topics of current medical importance; meta-analyses; scientific studies and opinions on radiologic education; and letters to the Editor.