Jennifer Meyer Reid, Karla L Miller, Brant Oliver, Melissa Swee, Jaime R Wilson
{"title":"通过临床监测工具加强药物超敏反应记录。","authors":"Jennifer Meyer Reid, Karla L Miller, Brant Oliver, Melissa Swee, Jaime R Wilson","doi":"10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000481","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Drug hypersensitivity reactions (DHRs) are potentially life-threatening, immune-mediated responses resulting from use of a medicinal product often requiring emergency department (ED) triage. For patient safety, DHR documentation in the electronic health record (EHR) is imperative-ensuring the health care team is alerted to patient risks with the offending drug. A Veterans Affairs Health Care System medication safety team uncovered that only 25.6% of patients treated for a DHR in their local ED had appropriate documentation of the DHR. To address this critical issue, a Quality Improvement (QI) project was designed with the aim of using a clinical surveillance tool to increase the DHR documentation rate in a single VA ED from 25.6% to ≥ 50% over 6 months. The DHR documentation rate was measured monthly and calculated by dividing the number of patients with appropriate DHR documentation after an ED visit for treatment of the DHR by the total number of patients visiting the ED for DHR treatment. Six months of postintervention data revealed an increase in appropriate DHR to 65.4%, through Exponentially Weighted Moving Averages Statistical Process Control analyses. This pharmacist-led QI project uses software already available at many institutions and illustrates one low-cost solution to address underreported DHRs.</p>","PeriodicalId":48801,"journal":{"name":"Journal for Healthcare Quality","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enhancing Drug Hypersensitivity Reaction Documentation Through a Clinical Surveillance Tool.\",\"authors\":\"Jennifer Meyer Reid, Karla L Miller, Brant Oliver, Melissa Swee, Jaime R Wilson\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000481\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Drug hypersensitivity reactions (DHRs) are potentially life-threatening, immune-mediated responses resulting from use of a medicinal product often requiring emergency department (ED) triage. For patient safety, DHR documentation in the electronic health record (EHR) is imperative-ensuring the health care team is alerted to patient risks with the offending drug. A Veterans Affairs Health Care System medication safety team uncovered that only 25.6% of patients treated for a DHR in their local ED had appropriate documentation of the DHR. To address this critical issue, a Quality Improvement (QI) project was designed with the aim of using a clinical surveillance tool to increase the DHR documentation rate in a single VA ED from 25.6% to ≥ 50% over 6 months. The DHR documentation rate was measured monthly and calculated by dividing the number of patients with appropriate DHR documentation after an ED visit for treatment of the DHR by the total number of patients visiting the ED for DHR treatment. Six months of postintervention data revealed an increase in appropriate DHR to 65.4%, through Exponentially Weighted Moving Averages Statistical Process Control analyses. This pharmacist-led QI project uses software already available at many institutions and illustrates one low-cost solution to address underreported DHRs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48801,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal for Healthcare Quality\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal for Healthcare Quality\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000481\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for Healthcare Quality","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000481","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Enhancing Drug Hypersensitivity Reaction Documentation Through a Clinical Surveillance Tool.
Abstract: Drug hypersensitivity reactions (DHRs) are potentially life-threatening, immune-mediated responses resulting from use of a medicinal product often requiring emergency department (ED) triage. For patient safety, DHR documentation in the electronic health record (EHR) is imperative-ensuring the health care team is alerted to patient risks with the offending drug. A Veterans Affairs Health Care System medication safety team uncovered that only 25.6% of patients treated for a DHR in their local ED had appropriate documentation of the DHR. To address this critical issue, a Quality Improvement (QI) project was designed with the aim of using a clinical surveillance tool to increase the DHR documentation rate in a single VA ED from 25.6% to ≥ 50% over 6 months. The DHR documentation rate was measured monthly and calculated by dividing the number of patients with appropriate DHR documentation after an ED visit for treatment of the DHR by the total number of patients visiting the ED for DHR treatment. Six months of postintervention data revealed an increase in appropriate DHR to 65.4%, through Exponentially Weighted Moving Averages Statistical Process Control analyses. This pharmacist-led QI project uses software already available at many institutions and illustrates one low-cost solution to address underreported DHRs.
期刊介绍:
The Journal for Healthcare Quality (JHQ), a peer-reviewed journal, is an official publication of the National Association for Healthcare Quality. JHQ is a professional forum that continuously advances healthcare quality practice in diverse and changing environments, and is the first choice for creative and scientific solutions in the pursuit of healthcare quality. It has been selected for coverage in Thomson Reuter’s Science Citation Index Expanded, Social Sciences Citation Index®, and Current Contents®.
The Journal publishes scholarly articles that are targeted to leaders of all healthcare settings, leveraging applied research and producing practical, timely and impactful evidence in healthcare system transformation. The journal covers topics such as:
Quality Improvement • Patient Safety • Performance Measurement • Best Practices in Clinical and Operational Processes • Innovation • Leadership • Information Technology • Spreading Improvement • Sustaining Improvement • Cost Reduction • Payment Reform