COVID-19检测和疫苗接种结果的个人、家庭结构和社会经济预测因素:与全人群相关的数据分析

IF 2.2 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
International Journal of Population Data Science Pub Date : 2025-05-27 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.23889/ijpds.v10i1.2930
Nicole Satherley, Andrew Sporle
{"title":"COVID-19检测和疫苗接种结果的个人、家庭结构和社会经济预测因素:与全人群相关的数据分析","authors":"Nicole Satherley, Andrew Sporle","doi":"10.23889/ijpds.v10i1.2930","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic produced social inequities in health outcomes between and within nations. Reported inequitable COVID-19 outcomes for ethnic minorities and indigenous peoples are likely to be associated in part because of poorer socioeconomic circumstances experienced by these populations. Understanding these associations within national populations is vital for future pandemic management.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study explores the social inequity of COVID-19 outcomes within New Zealand over the first 3 years of the pandemic. We aimed to identify policy amenable socioeconomic factors associated with COVID-19 outcomes while adjusting for relevant individual factors and household structure. We also aimed to examine whether ethnic group differences are smaller when accounting for these socioeconomic factors and household structure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Administrative individual-level data for the New Zealand population was analysed to assess COVID-19 health outcomes during 2020 - 2023. The association between individual (e.g. age, ethnicity, disability status), household structure (e.g. household composition) and socioeconomic (e.g. crowding, housing quality, deprivation) factors and four COVID-19 health outcomes - infection, hospitalisation, mortality, and vaccination status was assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Indigenous peoples and ethnic minorities experienced worse outcomes across most COVID-19 outcomes. Adjusting for household structure and socioeconomic factors reduced but did not eliminate these inequities between ethnic groups. Housing issues including high housing mobility, poor quality housing, and household crowding were associated with worse outcomes, as were disability status, no primary health care enrolment, lower household income and older age. The size of these effects also differed for different health outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Ethnic inequity was persistent and likely partly explained by policy-modifiable social factors, despite the relatively minor population health impacts of COVID-19 in New Zealand. We also demonstrate how a range of socioeconomic determinants predict COVID-19 outcomes in different ways.</p>","PeriodicalId":36483,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Population Data Science","volume":"10 1","pages":"2930"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12108692/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Individual, household structure, and socioeconomic predictors of COVID-19 testing and vaccination outcomes: a whole population linked data analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Nicole Satherley, Andrew Sporle\",\"doi\":\"10.23889/ijpds.v10i1.2930\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic produced social inequities in health outcomes between and within nations. Reported inequitable COVID-19 outcomes for ethnic minorities and indigenous peoples are likely to be associated in part because of poorer socioeconomic circumstances experienced by these populations. Understanding these associations within national populations is vital for future pandemic management.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study explores the social inequity of COVID-19 outcomes within New Zealand over the first 3 years of the pandemic. We aimed to identify policy amenable socioeconomic factors associated with COVID-19 outcomes while adjusting for relevant individual factors and household structure. We also aimed to examine whether ethnic group differences are smaller when accounting for these socioeconomic factors and household structure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Administrative individual-level data for the New Zealand population was analysed to assess COVID-19 health outcomes during 2020 - 2023. The association between individual (e.g. age, ethnicity, disability status), household structure (e.g. household composition) and socioeconomic (e.g. crowding, housing quality, deprivation) factors and four COVID-19 health outcomes - infection, hospitalisation, mortality, and vaccination status was assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Indigenous peoples and ethnic minorities experienced worse outcomes across most COVID-19 outcomes. Adjusting for household structure and socioeconomic factors reduced but did not eliminate these inequities between ethnic groups. Housing issues including high housing mobility, poor quality housing, and household crowding were associated with worse outcomes, as were disability status, no primary health care enrolment, lower household income and older age. The size of these effects also differed for different health outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Ethnic inequity was persistent and likely partly explained by policy-modifiable social factors, despite the relatively minor population health impacts of COVID-19 in New Zealand. We also demonstrate how a range of socioeconomic determinants predict COVID-19 outcomes in different ways.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36483,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Population Data Science\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"2930\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12108692/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Population Data Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23889/ijpds.v10i1.2930\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Population Data Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23889/ijpds.v10i1.2930","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:2019冠状病毒病大流行在国家之间和国家内部造成了卫生结果方面的社会不平等。少数民族和土著人民报告的COVID-19不公平结果可能部分与这些人群所经历的较差的社会经济环境有关。了解国家人群中的这些关联对于未来的大流行管理至关重要。目的:本研究探讨了新冠肺炎大流行头三年在新西兰的社会不平等现象。我们的目的是确定与COVID-19结果相关的政策适用的社会经济因素,同时调整相关的个人因素和家庭结构。我们还旨在研究在考虑这些社会经济因素和家庭结构时,族群差异是否较小。方法:分析新西兰人口行政层面的数据,以评估2020 - 2023年期间COVID-19的健康结果。评估了个人(如年龄、种族、残疾状况)、家庭结构(如家庭组成)和社会经济因素(如拥挤、住房质量、贫困)与COVID-19四种健康结果(感染、住院、死亡率和疫苗接种状况)之间的关系。结果:在大多数COVID-19结果中,土著人民和少数民族的结果较差。对家庭结构和社会经济因素的调整减少了但没有消除种族群体之间的不平等。住房问题,包括住房流动性高、住房质量差和家庭拥挤,以及残疾状况、没有初级保健登记、家庭收入较低和年龄较大,都与较差的结果有关。这些影响的大小也因不同的健康结果而不同。结论:尽管COVID-19对新西兰人口健康的影响相对较小,但种族不平等现象持续存在,可能部分归因于政策可改变的社会因素。我们还展示了一系列社会经济决定因素如何以不同方式预测COVID-19的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Individual, household structure, and socioeconomic predictors of COVID-19 testing and vaccination outcomes: a whole population linked data analysis.

Individual, household structure, and socioeconomic predictors of COVID-19 testing and vaccination outcomes: a whole population linked data analysis.

Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic produced social inequities in health outcomes between and within nations. Reported inequitable COVID-19 outcomes for ethnic minorities and indigenous peoples are likely to be associated in part because of poorer socioeconomic circumstances experienced by these populations. Understanding these associations within national populations is vital for future pandemic management.

Objective: This study explores the social inequity of COVID-19 outcomes within New Zealand over the first 3 years of the pandemic. We aimed to identify policy amenable socioeconomic factors associated with COVID-19 outcomes while adjusting for relevant individual factors and household structure. We also aimed to examine whether ethnic group differences are smaller when accounting for these socioeconomic factors and household structure.

Methods: Administrative individual-level data for the New Zealand population was analysed to assess COVID-19 health outcomes during 2020 - 2023. The association between individual (e.g. age, ethnicity, disability status), household structure (e.g. household composition) and socioeconomic (e.g. crowding, housing quality, deprivation) factors and four COVID-19 health outcomes - infection, hospitalisation, mortality, and vaccination status was assessed.

Results: Indigenous peoples and ethnic minorities experienced worse outcomes across most COVID-19 outcomes. Adjusting for household structure and socioeconomic factors reduced but did not eliminate these inequities between ethnic groups. Housing issues including high housing mobility, poor quality housing, and household crowding were associated with worse outcomes, as were disability status, no primary health care enrolment, lower household income and older age. The size of these effects also differed for different health outcomes.

Conclusions: Ethnic inequity was persistent and likely partly explained by policy-modifiable social factors, despite the relatively minor population health impacts of COVID-19 in New Zealand. We also demonstrate how a range of socioeconomic determinants predict COVID-19 outcomes in different ways.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
386
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信