制定以患者为中心的重症产妇发病率的新定义。

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Adina R Kern-Goldberger, Lauren E Callans, Rebecca F Hamm, Lisa D Levine
{"title":"制定以患者为中心的重症产妇发病率的新定义。","authors":"Adina R Kern-Goldberger, Lauren E Callans, Rebecca F Hamm, Lisa D Levine","doi":"10.1016/j.ajogmf.2025.101706","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Defining, preventing, and evaluating severe maternal morbidity (SMM) has become an important component of obstetric care delivery, but existing frameworks for SMM do not account for how patients perceive and experience morbidity.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study evaluated patient values and perceptions related to maternal pregnancy complications with the goal of devising a patient-centered maternal morbidity composite.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>This 2-part sequential qualitative to quantitative mixed-methods study first involved semi-structured interviews of postpartum patients recruited from an urban, academic hospital prior to discharge from the delivery admission with purposive sampling by race and mode of delivery. Qualitative data around patient-perceived adverse maternal events were analyzed thematically. These themes were used to develop a survey which prompted ranking the maternal complications derived from these interview data as well as the SMM indicators defined by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) on a scale from 1 [\"no big deal\"] - 5 [\"worst thing imaginable\"]. Responses were compared in bivariate analyses among patients who did and did not personally experience an expanded maternal morbidity composite inclusive of SMM as well as postpartum hemorrhage, re-operation, intensive care unit admission, and endometritis/post-operative infection. All postpartum patients were eligible to participate and recruited participants completed the survey prior to discharge.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>18 patients participated in the semi-structured interviews with 9 themes identified distinct from established SMM criteria. 501 patients then completed the survey over 5 months (6/2022 - 11/2022). 60.7% of participants were Black, 6.5% were Hispanic, median maternal age was 31 [IQR 26-34], 40.6% underwent cesarean delivery, 6% experienced a postpartum hemorrhage, and 1.6% (N = 8) experienced non-transfusion SMM as defined by the CDC. The 3 maternal morbidity outcomes ranked by patients as \"worst\" were stroke/seizure, hysterectomy, and heart failure. Other notable findings included that 66.3% of patients ranked severe postpartum depression as a 4 or 5, higher than hemorrhage, transfusion, and long-term physical disability. There were no significant differences in scoring of maternal morbidity types among patients who did and did not personally experience morbidity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Adverse maternal outcomes important to patients do not correlate directly with established SMM composites. Novel definitions of maternal morbidity incorporating expanded indicators such as severe depression could fuel a patient-centered approach to evaluating and mitigating SMM in research and clinical care.</p>","PeriodicalId":36186,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology Mfm","volume":" ","pages":"101706"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Developing a Novel Patient-Centered Definition of Severe Maternal Morbidity.\",\"authors\":\"Adina R Kern-Goldberger, Lauren E Callans, Rebecca F Hamm, Lisa D Levine\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ajogmf.2025.101706\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Defining, preventing, and evaluating severe maternal morbidity (SMM) has become an important component of obstetric care delivery, but existing frameworks for SMM do not account for how patients perceive and experience morbidity.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study evaluated patient values and perceptions related to maternal pregnancy complications with the goal of devising a patient-centered maternal morbidity composite.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>This 2-part sequential qualitative to quantitative mixed-methods study first involved semi-structured interviews of postpartum patients recruited from an urban, academic hospital prior to discharge from the delivery admission with purposive sampling by race and mode of delivery. Qualitative data around patient-perceived adverse maternal events were analyzed thematically. These themes were used to develop a survey which prompted ranking the maternal complications derived from these interview data as well as the SMM indicators defined by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) on a scale from 1 [\\\"no big deal\\\"] - 5 [\\\"worst thing imaginable\\\"]. Responses were compared in bivariate analyses among patients who did and did not personally experience an expanded maternal morbidity composite inclusive of SMM as well as postpartum hemorrhage, re-operation, intensive care unit admission, and endometritis/post-operative infection. All postpartum patients were eligible to participate and recruited participants completed the survey prior to discharge.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>18 patients participated in the semi-structured interviews with 9 themes identified distinct from established SMM criteria. 501 patients then completed the survey over 5 months (6/2022 - 11/2022). 60.7% of participants were Black, 6.5% were Hispanic, median maternal age was 31 [IQR 26-34], 40.6% underwent cesarean delivery, 6% experienced a postpartum hemorrhage, and 1.6% (N = 8) experienced non-transfusion SMM as defined by the CDC. The 3 maternal morbidity outcomes ranked by patients as \\\"worst\\\" were stroke/seizure, hysterectomy, and heart failure. Other notable findings included that 66.3% of patients ranked severe postpartum depression as a 4 or 5, higher than hemorrhage, transfusion, and long-term physical disability. There were no significant differences in scoring of maternal morbidity types among patients who did and did not personally experience morbidity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Adverse maternal outcomes important to patients do not correlate directly with established SMM composites. Novel definitions of maternal morbidity incorporating expanded indicators such as severe depression could fuel a patient-centered approach to evaluating and mitigating SMM in research and clinical care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36186,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology Mfm\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"101706\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology Mfm\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajogmf.2025.101706\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology Mfm","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajogmf.2025.101706","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:定义、预防和评估严重孕产妇发病率(SMM)已成为产科护理交付的重要组成部分,但现有的SMM框架并没有考虑到患者如何感知和经历发病率。目的:本研究旨在评估患者对孕产妇妊娠并发症的价值和看法,以设计一个以患者为中心的孕产妇发病率组合。研究设计:这个由两部分组成的连续定性和定量混合方法研究首先涉及从一家城市学术医院招募的产后患者的半结构化访谈,这些患者在分娩入院前出院,并按种族和分娩方式进行有目的抽样。对患者感知的孕产妇不良事件的定性数据进行主题分析。这些主题被用于开展一项调查,该调查促使从这些访谈数据中得出的产妇并发症以及疾病控制和预防中心(CDC)定义的SMM指标进行排名,从1[“没什么大不了的”]到5[“最糟糕的事情”]。在双变量分析中比较了有和没有亲身经历孕产妇发病率扩大的患者的反应,包括SMM以及产后出血、再次手术、重症监护病房住院和子宫内膜炎/术后感染。所有的产后患者都有资格参加,招募的参与者在出院前完成了调查。结果:18名患者参加了9个不同于既定SMM标准的半结构化访谈。501名患者随后在5个月内(2022年6月至2022年11月)完成了调查。60.7%的参与者为黑人,6.5%为西班牙裔,中位母亲年龄为31岁[IQR 26-34], 40.6%的参与者接受了剖宫产,6%的参与者经历了产后出血,1.6% (N = 8)经历了CDC定义的非输血SMM。被患者列为“最糟糕”的3种产妇发病结局是中风/癫痫、子宫切除术和心力衰竭。其他值得注意的发现包括66.3%的患者将严重产后抑郁症列为4或5级,高于出血、输血和长期身体残疾。在有和没有亲身经历过发病率的患者中,产妇发病率类型的评分没有显著差异。结论:对患者重要的不良产妇结局与已建立的SMM组合没有直接关系。产妇发病率的新定义纳入了更广泛的指标,如严重抑郁症,可以推动以患者为中心的方法来评估和减轻研究和临床护理中的SMM。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Developing a Novel Patient-Centered Definition of Severe Maternal Morbidity.

Background: Defining, preventing, and evaluating severe maternal morbidity (SMM) has become an important component of obstetric care delivery, but existing frameworks for SMM do not account for how patients perceive and experience morbidity.

Objective: This study evaluated patient values and perceptions related to maternal pregnancy complications with the goal of devising a patient-centered maternal morbidity composite.

Study design: This 2-part sequential qualitative to quantitative mixed-methods study first involved semi-structured interviews of postpartum patients recruited from an urban, academic hospital prior to discharge from the delivery admission with purposive sampling by race and mode of delivery. Qualitative data around patient-perceived adverse maternal events were analyzed thematically. These themes were used to develop a survey which prompted ranking the maternal complications derived from these interview data as well as the SMM indicators defined by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) on a scale from 1 ["no big deal"] - 5 ["worst thing imaginable"]. Responses were compared in bivariate analyses among patients who did and did not personally experience an expanded maternal morbidity composite inclusive of SMM as well as postpartum hemorrhage, re-operation, intensive care unit admission, and endometritis/post-operative infection. All postpartum patients were eligible to participate and recruited participants completed the survey prior to discharge.

Results: 18 patients participated in the semi-structured interviews with 9 themes identified distinct from established SMM criteria. 501 patients then completed the survey over 5 months (6/2022 - 11/2022). 60.7% of participants were Black, 6.5% were Hispanic, median maternal age was 31 [IQR 26-34], 40.6% underwent cesarean delivery, 6% experienced a postpartum hemorrhage, and 1.6% (N = 8) experienced non-transfusion SMM as defined by the CDC. The 3 maternal morbidity outcomes ranked by patients as "worst" were stroke/seizure, hysterectomy, and heart failure. Other notable findings included that 66.3% of patients ranked severe postpartum depression as a 4 or 5, higher than hemorrhage, transfusion, and long-term physical disability. There were no significant differences in scoring of maternal morbidity types among patients who did and did not personally experience morbidity.

Conclusion: Adverse maternal outcomes important to patients do not correlate directly with established SMM composites. Novel definitions of maternal morbidity incorporating expanded indicators such as severe depression could fuel a patient-centered approach to evaluating and mitigating SMM in research and clinical care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
3.20%
发文量
254
审稿时长
40 days
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (AJOG) is a highly esteemed publication with two companion titles. One of these is the American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology Maternal-Fetal Medicine (AJOG MFM), which is dedicated to the latest research in the field of maternal-fetal medicine, specifically concerning high-risk pregnancies. The journal encompasses a wide range of topics, including: Maternal Complications: It addresses significant studies that have the potential to change clinical practice regarding complications faced by pregnant women. Fetal Complications: The journal covers prenatal diagnosis, ultrasound, and genetic issues related to the fetus, providing insights into the management and care of fetal health. Prenatal Care: It discusses the best practices in prenatal care to ensure the health and well-being of both the mother and the unborn child. Intrapartum Care: It provides guidance on the care provided during the childbirth process, which is critical for the safety of both mother and baby. Postpartum Issues: The journal also tackles issues that arise after childbirth, focusing on the postpartum period and its implications for maternal health. AJOG MFM serves as a reliable forum for peer-reviewed research, with a preference for randomized trials and meta-analyses. The goal is to equip researchers and clinicians with the most current information and evidence-based strategies to effectively manage high-risk pregnancies and to provide the best possible care for mothers and their unborn children.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信