对骨髓捐赠成本的认知如何影响捐赠行为:来自大型捐赠者登记的调查证据。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Michael Haylock, Patrick Kampkötter, Mario Macis, Susanne Seitz, Robert Slonim, Edith Wienand, Daniel Wiesen, Alexander H Schmidt
{"title":"对骨髓捐赠成本的认知如何影响捐赠行为:来自大型捐赠者登记的调查证据。","authors":"Michael Haylock, Patrick Kampkötter, Mario Macis, Susanne Seitz, Robert Slonim, Edith Wienand, Daniel Wiesen, Alexander H Schmidt","doi":"10.1007/s10198-025-01785-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Over the past three decades, advancements in collection methods for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation substantially reduced invasiveness and safety concerns. To what extent, however, registered donors are informed about extraction methods and how their beliefs drive their willingness to follow through with a donation is not well understood. Inaccurate beliefs about extraction methods may cause donors to overestimate their perceived cost, potentially reducing donations. In a survey with about 24,000 potential donors in Germany's largest stem-cell registry, we investigate how beliefs about extraction methods affect potential donors' willingness to follow through with a stem cell donation. We find widespread misconceptions about extraction methods, with many donors attributing a significant fraction of stem cell extractions to be coming from never-used methods. Importantly, a lack of knowledge and misconceptions about extraction methods persist among registered donors, often anchored to methods that prevailed at the time of registration. Exploring the link between donors' beliefs and their (stated) willingness to donate, we find that accurate beliefs about lower extraction costs correlate with a 2.2-2.9 percentage points higher willingness to donate, representing a 40% reduction in donor unavailability. Our results highlight the need for informational campaigns to correct donors' misconceptions and potentially save more lives among blood cancer patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":51416,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Health Economics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How perceptions of bone marrow donation costs affect donation behavior: survey evidence from a large donor registry.\",\"authors\":\"Michael Haylock, Patrick Kampkötter, Mario Macis, Susanne Seitz, Robert Slonim, Edith Wienand, Daniel Wiesen, Alexander H Schmidt\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10198-025-01785-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Over the past three decades, advancements in collection methods for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation substantially reduced invasiveness and safety concerns. To what extent, however, registered donors are informed about extraction methods and how their beliefs drive their willingness to follow through with a donation is not well understood. Inaccurate beliefs about extraction methods may cause donors to overestimate their perceived cost, potentially reducing donations. In a survey with about 24,000 potential donors in Germany's largest stem-cell registry, we investigate how beliefs about extraction methods affect potential donors' willingness to follow through with a stem cell donation. We find widespread misconceptions about extraction methods, with many donors attributing a significant fraction of stem cell extractions to be coming from never-used methods. Importantly, a lack of knowledge and misconceptions about extraction methods persist among registered donors, often anchored to methods that prevailed at the time of registration. Exploring the link between donors' beliefs and their (stated) willingness to donate, we find that accurate beliefs about lower extraction costs correlate with a 2.2-2.9 percentage points higher willingness to donate, representing a 40% reduction in donor unavailability. Our results highlight the need for informational campaigns to correct donors' misconceptions and potentially save more lives among blood cancer patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51416,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Health Economics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Health Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-025-01785-4\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Health Economics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-025-01785-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在过去的三十年中,造血干细胞移植收集方法的进步大大减少了侵入性和安全性问题。然而,登记的捐赠者在多大程度上被告知提取方法,以及他们的信念如何驱使他们愿意进行捐赠,目前还不清楚。对提取方法的不准确信念可能会导致捐赠者高估他们的感知成本,从而潜在地减少捐赠。在德国最大的干细胞登记处对大约24,000名潜在捐赠者进行的调查中,我们调查了对提取方法的信念如何影响潜在捐赠者坚持干细胞捐赠的意愿。我们发现对提取方法普遍存在误解,许多供体认为很大一部分干细胞提取来自从未使用过的方法。重要的是,在已登记的捐献者中,对提取方法缺乏知识和误解仍然存在,这些方法往往与登记时流行的方法有关。通过探索捐赠者的信念与他们(陈述的)捐赠意愿之间的联系,我们发现,准确地相信更低的提取成本与2.2-2.9个百分点的捐赠意愿相关,这意味着无法获得捐赠的情况减少了40%。我们的研究结果强调,需要开展信息宣传活动,纠正献血者的误解,并可能挽救更多血癌患者的生命。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How perceptions of bone marrow donation costs affect donation behavior: survey evidence from a large donor registry.

Over the past three decades, advancements in collection methods for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation substantially reduced invasiveness and safety concerns. To what extent, however, registered donors are informed about extraction methods and how their beliefs drive their willingness to follow through with a donation is not well understood. Inaccurate beliefs about extraction methods may cause donors to overestimate their perceived cost, potentially reducing donations. In a survey with about 24,000 potential donors in Germany's largest stem-cell registry, we investigate how beliefs about extraction methods affect potential donors' willingness to follow through with a stem cell donation. We find widespread misconceptions about extraction methods, with many donors attributing a significant fraction of stem cell extractions to be coming from never-used methods. Importantly, a lack of knowledge and misconceptions about extraction methods persist among registered donors, often anchored to methods that prevailed at the time of registration. Exploring the link between donors' beliefs and their (stated) willingness to donate, we find that accurate beliefs about lower extraction costs correlate with a 2.2-2.9 percentage points higher willingness to donate, representing a 40% reduction in donor unavailability. Our results highlight the need for informational campaigns to correct donors' misconceptions and potentially save more lives among blood cancer patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.30%
发文量
131
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Health Economics is a journal of Health Economics and associated disciplines. The growing demand for health economics and the introduction of new guidelines in various European countries were the motivation to generate a highly scientific and at the same time practice oriented journal considering the requirements of various health care systems in Europe. The international scientific board of opinion leaders guarantees high-quality, peer-reviewed publications as well as articles for pragmatic approaches in the field of health economics. We intend to cover all aspects of health economics: • Basics of health economic approaches and methods • Pharmacoeconomics • Health Care Systems • Pricing and Reimbursement Systems • Quality-of-Life-Studies The editors reserve the right to reject manuscripts that do not comply with the above-mentioned requirements. The author will be held responsible for false statements or for failure to fulfill the above-mentioned requirements. Officially cited as: Eur J Health Econ
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信