三维快速成型曲线特定脊柱侧凸模型:一种经济实惠的方法,以减少胸腰椎内侧椎弓根螺钉穿孔。

IF 1.6 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Junyu Li, Yongqiang Wang, Xin Huo, Nanfang Xu, Sheng Wang, Zekun Li, Miao Yu, Yan Zeng, Weishi Li
{"title":"三维快速成型曲线特定脊柱侧凸模型:一种经济实惠的方法,以减少胸腰椎内侧椎弓根螺钉穿孔。","authors":"Junyu Li, Yongqiang Wang, Xin Huo, Nanfang Xu, Sheng Wang, Zekun Li, Miao Yu, Yan Zeng, Weishi Li","doi":"10.1007/s43390-025-01114-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to investigate the effect of 3D rapid prototyping(3DRP) curve-specific scoliosis model in pedicle screws placement, and contrast it with standard free-hand techniques.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review on scoliosis patients operated on by a single surgeon from 2014 to 2018 identified 48 patients with curve-specific models manufactured by 3DRP and used intra-operatively for guidance of instrumentation. They were age and gender-matched to 48 scoliosis patients in whom pedicle screws were placed following the standard free-hand technique. Screw position was determined on CT by a grading system as Grade 0 (no violation), Grade 1 (< 2 mm perforation), Grade 2 (< 4 mm perforation), or Grade 3 (> 4 mm perforation).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>1485 screws (686 in the 3DRP group vs. 799 in the control group) were analyzed. Patients in the 3DRP group had higher Cobb angles and more challenging deformity. Although the overall percentages of critical perforations (those with risk of complications) were comparable between the two groups, the distribution of screw perforation were different. Screws in the 3DRP group were less likely to be critical both medially and laterally, and more likely to be critical anteriorly. Furthermore, laterally and anteriorly, the difference between them were largely due to a difference in Grade 2 perforation, whereas medially, the difference resulted from a higher percentage of both Grade 2 and Grade 3 perforation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>3DRP scoliosis model represents an affordable and accessible approach to reduce medial pedicle screw perforation with high risk of complications in the thoracic and lumbar spine.</p>","PeriodicalId":21796,"journal":{"name":"Spine deformity","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"3D rapid prototyping curve-specific scoliosis model: an affordable approach to reduce medial pedicle screw perforation in the thoracic and lumbar spine.\",\"authors\":\"Junyu Li, Yongqiang Wang, Xin Huo, Nanfang Xu, Sheng Wang, Zekun Li, Miao Yu, Yan Zeng, Weishi Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s43390-025-01114-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to investigate the effect of 3D rapid prototyping(3DRP) curve-specific scoliosis model in pedicle screws placement, and contrast it with standard free-hand techniques.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review on scoliosis patients operated on by a single surgeon from 2014 to 2018 identified 48 patients with curve-specific models manufactured by 3DRP and used intra-operatively for guidance of instrumentation. They were age and gender-matched to 48 scoliosis patients in whom pedicle screws were placed following the standard free-hand technique. Screw position was determined on CT by a grading system as Grade 0 (no violation), Grade 1 (< 2 mm perforation), Grade 2 (< 4 mm perforation), or Grade 3 (> 4 mm perforation).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>1485 screws (686 in the 3DRP group vs. 799 in the control group) were analyzed. Patients in the 3DRP group had higher Cobb angles and more challenging deformity. Although the overall percentages of critical perforations (those with risk of complications) were comparable between the two groups, the distribution of screw perforation were different. Screws in the 3DRP group were less likely to be critical both medially and laterally, and more likely to be critical anteriorly. Furthermore, laterally and anteriorly, the difference between them were largely due to a difference in Grade 2 perforation, whereas medially, the difference resulted from a higher percentage of both Grade 2 and Grade 3 perforation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>3DRP scoliosis model represents an affordable and accessible approach to reduce medial pedicle screw perforation with high risk of complications in the thoracic and lumbar spine.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21796,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Spine deformity\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Spine deformity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43390-025-01114-y\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine deformity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43390-025-01114-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨3D快速成型(3DRP)曲线型脊柱侧凸模型在椎弓根螺钉置入中的效果,并与标准徒手技术进行对比。方法:回顾性分析2014年至2018年由一名外科医生手术的48例脊柱侧凸患者,采用3DRP制作的曲线特异性模型,并在术中指导内固定。他们的年龄和性别与48例脊柱侧凸患者相匹配,这些患者按照标准的徒手技术放置椎弓根螺钉。螺钉位置在CT上通过分级系统确定为0级(无违和),1级(穿孔4mm)。结果:共分析螺钉1485枚(3DRP组686枚,对照组799枚)。3DRP组患者有更高的Cobb角和更多的挑战性畸形。虽然两组之间的关键穿孔(并发症风险)的总体百分比相当,但螺钉穿孔的分布不同。3DRP组的螺钉在内侧和外侧都不太可能发生临界,而在前方更可能发生临界。此外,它们之间的差异主要是由于2级穿孔的差异,而内侧的差异则是由于2级和3级穿孔的百分比较高。结论:3DRP脊柱侧凸模型是一种经济可行的方法,可减少胸腰椎内侧椎弓根螺钉穿孔及并发症的高风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
3D rapid prototyping curve-specific scoliosis model: an affordable approach to reduce medial pedicle screw perforation in the thoracic and lumbar spine.

Purpose: This study aimed to investigate the effect of 3D rapid prototyping(3DRP) curve-specific scoliosis model in pedicle screws placement, and contrast it with standard free-hand techniques.

Methods: A retrospective review on scoliosis patients operated on by a single surgeon from 2014 to 2018 identified 48 patients with curve-specific models manufactured by 3DRP and used intra-operatively for guidance of instrumentation. They were age and gender-matched to 48 scoliosis patients in whom pedicle screws were placed following the standard free-hand technique. Screw position was determined on CT by a grading system as Grade 0 (no violation), Grade 1 (< 2 mm perforation), Grade 2 (< 4 mm perforation), or Grade 3 (> 4 mm perforation).

Results: 1485 screws (686 in the 3DRP group vs. 799 in the control group) were analyzed. Patients in the 3DRP group had higher Cobb angles and more challenging deformity. Although the overall percentages of critical perforations (those with risk of complications) were comparable between the two groups, the distribution of screw perforation were different. Screws in the 3DRP group were less likely to be critical both medially and laterally, and more likely to be critical anteriorly. Furthermore, laterally and anteriorly, the difference between them were largely due to a difference in Grade 2 perforation, whereas medially, the difference resulted from a higher percentage of both Grade 2 and Grade 3 perforation.

Conclusion: 3DRP scoliosis model represents an affordable and accessible approach to reduce medial pedicle screw perforation with high risk of complications in the thoracic and lumbar spine.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
18.80%
发文量
167
期刊介绍: Spine Deformity the official journal of the?Scoliosis Research Society is a peer-refereed publication to disseminate knowledge on basic science and clinical research into the?etiology?biomechanics?treatment?methods and outcomes of all types of?spinal deformities. The international members of the Editorial Board provide a worldwide perspective for the journal's area of interest.The?journal?will enhance the mission of the Society which is to foster the optimal care of all patients with?spine?deformities worldwide. Articles published in?Spine Deformity?are Medline indexed in PubMed.? The journal publishes original articles in the form of clinical and basic research. Spine Deformity will only publish studies that have institutional review board (IRB) or similar ethics committee approval for human and animal studies and have strictly observed these guidelines. The minimum follow-up period for follow-up clinical studies is 24 months.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信