Junyu Li, Yongqiang Wang, Xin Huo, Nanfang Xu, Sheng Wang, Zekun Li, Miao Yu, Yan Zeng, Weishi Li
{"title":"三维快速成型曲线特定脊柱侧凸模型:一种经济实惠的方法,以减少胸腰椎内侧椎弓根螺钉穿孔。","authors":"Junyu Li, Yongqiang Wang, Xin Huo, Nanfang Xu, Sheng Wang, Zekun Li, Miao Yu, Yan Zeng, Weishi Li","doi":"10.1007/s43390-025-01114-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to investigate the effect of 3D rapid prototyping(3DRP) curve-specific scoliosis model in pedicle screws placement, and contrast it with standard free-hand techniques.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review on scoliosis patients operated on by a single surgeon from 2014 to 2018 identified 48 patients with curve-specific models manufactured by 3DRP and used intra-operatively for guidance of instrumentation. They were age and gender-matched to 48 scoliosis patients in whom pedicle screws were placed following the standard free-hand technique. Screw position was determined on CT by a grading system as Grade 0 (no violation), Grade 1 (< 2 mm perforation), Grade 2 (< 4 mm perforation), or Grade 3 (> 4 mm perforation).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>1485 screws (686 in the 3DRP group vs. 799 in the control group) were analyzed. Patients in the 3DRP group had higher Cobb angles and more challenging deformity. Although the overall percentages of critical perforations (those with risk of complications) were comparable between the two groups, the distribution of screw perforation were different. Screws in the 3DRP group were less likely to be critical both medially and laterally, and more likely to be critical anteriorly. Furthermore, laterally and anteriorly, the difference between them were largely due to a difference in Grade 2 perforation, whereas medially, the difference resulted from a higher percentage of both Grade 2 and Grade 3 perforation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>3DRP scoliosis model represents an affordable and accessible approach to reduce medial pedicle screw perforation with high risk of complications in the thoracic and lumbar spine.</p>","PeriodicalId":21796,"journal":{"name":"Spine deformity","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"3D rapid prototyping curve-specific scoliosis model: an affordable approach to reduce medial pedicle screw perforation in the thoracic and lumbar spine.\",\"authors\":\"Junyu Li, Yongqiang Wang, Xin Huo, Nanfang Xu, Sheng Wang, Zekun Li, Miao Yu, Yan Zeng, Weishi Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s43390-025-01114-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to investigate the effect of 3D rapid prototyping(3DRP) curve-specific scoliosis model in pedicle screws placement, and contrast it with standard free-hand techniques.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review on scoliosis patients operated on by a single surgeon from 2014 to 2018 identified 48 patients with curve-specific models manufactured by 3DRP and used intra-operatively for guidance of instrumentation. They were age and gender-matched to 48 scoliosis patients in whom pedicle screws were placed following the standard free-hand technique. Screw position was determined on CT by a grading system as Grade 0 (no violation), Grade 1 (< 2 mm perforation), Grade 2 (< 4 mm perforation), or Grade 3 (> 4 mm perforation).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>1485 screws (686 in the 3DRP group vs. 799 in the control group) were analyzed. Patients in the 3DRP group had higher Cobb angles and more challenging deformity. Although the overall percentages of critical perforations (those with risk of complications) were comparable between the two groups, the distribution of screw perforation were different. Screws in the 3DRP group were less likely to be critical both medially and laterally, and more likely to be critical anteriorly. Furthermore, laterally and anteriorly, the difference between them were largely due to a difference in Grade 2 perforation, whereas medially, the difference resulted from a higher percentage of both Grade 2 and Grade 3 perforation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>3DRP scoliosis model represents an affordable and accessible approach to reduce medial pedicle screw perforation with high risk of complications in the thoracic and lumbar spine.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21796,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Spine deformity\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Spine deformity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43390-025-01114-y\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine deformity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43390-025-01114-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
3D rapid prototyping curve-specific scoliosis model: an affordable approach to reduce medial pedicle screw perforation in the thoracic and lumbar spine.
Purpose: This study aimed to investigate the effect of 3D rapid prototyping(3DRP) curve-specific scoliosis model in pedicle screws placement, and contrast it with standard free-hand techniques.
Methods: A retrospective review on scoliosis patients operated on by a single surgeon from 2014 to 2018 identified 48 patients with curve-specific models manufactured by 3DRP and used intra-operatively for guidance of instrumentation. They were age and gender-matched to 48 scoliosis patients in whom pedicle screws were placed following the standard free-hand technique. Screw position was determined on CT by a grading system as Grade 0 (no violation), Grade 1 (< 2 mm perforation), Grade 2 (< 4 mm perforation), or Grade 3 (> 4 mm perforation).
Results: 1485 screws (686 in the 3DRP group vs. 799 in the control group) were analyzed. Patients in the 3DRP group had higher Cobb angles and more challenging deformity. Although the overall percentages of critical perforations (those with risk of complications) were comparable between the two groups, the distribution of screw perforation were different. Screws in the 3DRP group were less likely to be critical both medially and laterally, and more likely to be critical anteriorly. Furthermore, laterally and anteriorly, the difference between them were largely due to a difference in Grade 2 perforation, whereas medially, the difference resulted from a higher percentage of both Grade 2 and Grade 3 perforation.
Conclusion: 3DRP scoliosis model represents an affordable and accessible approach to reduce medial pedicle screw perforation with high risk of complications in the thoracic and lumbar spine.
期刊介绍:
Spine Deformity the official journal of the?Scoliosis Research Society is a peer-refereed publication to disseminate knowledge on basic science and clinical research into the?etiology?biomechanics?treatment?methods and outcomes of all types of?spinal deformities. The international members of the Editorial Board provide a worldwide perspective for the journal's area of interest.The?journal?will enhance the mission of the Society which is to foster the optimal care of all patients with?spine?deformities worldwide. Articles published in?Spine Deformity?are Medline indexed in PubMed.? The journal publishes original articles in the form of clinical and basic research. Spine Deformity will only publish studies that have institutional review board (IRB) or similar ethics committee approval for human and animal studies and have strictly observed these guidelines. The minimum follow-up period for follow-up clinical studies is 24 months.