矿皮质激素受体拮抗剂在保留射血分数的心力衰竭中的应用:系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Mithila Zaheen, Fardin Ferdous, Anjalee T Amarasekera, Johannes Petutschnigg, Frank Edelmann, Timothy C Tan
{"title":"矿皮质激素受体拮抗剂在保留射血分数的心力衰竭中的应用:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Mithila Zaheen, Fardin Ferdous, Anjalee T Amarasekera, Johannes Petutschnigg, Frank Edelmann, Timothy C Tan","doi":"10.3390/jcm14103598","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives</b>: Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a complex clinical syndrome with limited therapeutic options. Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) have been shown to improve clinical outcomes in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), but their use in patients with HFpEF remains controversial. The aim of this review is to evaluate whether the use of MRAs improves diastolic function, functional capacity, and quality of life in patients with HFpEF. <b>Methods</b>: A systematic literature search of scientific databases was performed to identify studies comparing the use of MRAs to placebo or no treatment in adult patients with HFpEF (2000-2024; English; PROSPERO registration CRD42022300783). Data were meta-analysed using a random-effects model for overall effect size measured as the standardised mean difference. <b>Results</b>: Pooled data revealed a significant benefit of MRA use compared to the control in decreasing E/e' (SMD -0.21; 95% CI: -0.33 to -0.10, <i>p</i> = 0.00), with greater improvement seen with longer duration of treatment. A substantial reduction in systolic blood pressure (SMD -0.27; 95% CI: -0.53 to -0.02, <i>p</i> = 0.03) and diastolic blood pressure (SMD -0.18; 95% CI: -0.32 to -0.04, <i>p</i> = 0.01) was also noted. There was no significant difference in the 6 min walk distance, peak exercise capacity, or quality-of-life measures. Adverse events such as hyperkalaemia and worsening renal function were frequently reported in the MRA group. <b>Conclusions</b>: MRAs improve echocardiographic parameters of diastolic function and BP control; however, this did not translate into clinical outcomes of improved functional capacity or quality of life.</p>","PeriodicalId":15533,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Medicine","volume":"14 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Mithila Zaheen, Fardin Ferdous, Anjalee T Amarasekera, Johannes Petutschnigg, Frank Edelmann, Timothy C Tan\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/jcm14103598\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives</b>: Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a complex clinical syndrome with limited therapeutic options. Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) have been shown to improve clinical outcomes in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), but their use in patients with HFpEF remains controversial. The aim of this review is to evaluate whether the use of MRAs improves diastolic function, functional capacity, and quality of life in patients with HFpEF. <b>Methods</b>: A systematic literature search of scientific databases was performed to identify studies comparing the use of MRAs to placebo or no treatment in adult patients with HFpEF (2000-2024; English; PROSPERO registration CRD42022300783). Data were meta-analysed using a random-effects model for overall effect size measured as the standardised mean difference. <b>Results</b>: Pooled data revealed a significant benefit of MRA use compared to the control in decreasing E/e' (SMD -0.21; 95% CI: -0.33 to -0.10, <i>p</i> = 0.00), with greater improvement seen with longer duration of treatment. A substantial reduction in systolic blood pressure (SMD -0.27; 95% CI: -0.53 to -0.02, <i>p</i> = 0.03) and diastolic blood pressure (SMD -0.18; 95% CI: -0.32 to -0.04, <i>p</i> = 0.01) was also noted. There was no significant difference in the 6 min walk distance, peak exercise capacity, or quality-of-life measures. Adverse events such as hyperkalaemia and worsening renal function were frequently reported in the MRA group. <b>Conclusions</b>: MRAs improve echocardiographic parameters of diastolic function and BP control; however, this did not translate into clinical outcomes of improved functional capacity or quality of life.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15533,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Medicine\",\"volume\":\"14 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14103598\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14103598","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景/目的:保留射血分数的心力衰竭(HFpEF)是一种复杂的临床综合征,治疗选择有限。矿皮质激素受体拮抗剂(MRAs)已被证明可以改善心力衰竭伴射血分数降低(HFrEF)患者的临床结果,但它们在HFpEF患者中的应用仍存在争议。本综述的目的是评估MRAs的使用是否能改善HFpEF患者的舒张功能、功能容量和生活质量。方法:对科学数据库进行系统的文献检索,以确定对成年HFpEF患者使用MRAs与安慰剂或不治疗进行比较的研究(2000-2024;英语;普洛斯彼罗注册号CRD42022300783)。使用随机效应模型对数据进行meta分析,以标准化平均差衡量总体效应大小。结果:汇总数据显示,与对照组相比,MRA使用在降低E/ E ' (SMD -0.21;95% CI: -0.33 ~ -0.10, p = 0.00),治疗时间越长,改善越明显。收缩压显著降低(SMD -0.27;95% CI: -0.53 ~ -0.02, p = 0.03)和舒张压(SMD -0.18;95% CI: -0.32 ~ -0.04, p = 0.01)。在6分钟步行距离、峰值运动能力或生活质量方面没有显著差异。MRA组经常报告高钾血症和肾功能恶化等不良事件。结论:磁共振成像可改善舒张功能和血压控制的超声心动图参数;然而,这并没有转化为改善功能能力或生活质量的临床结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background/Objectives: Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a complex clinical syndrome with limited therapeutic options. Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) have been shown to improve clinical outcomes in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), but their use in patients with HFpEF remains controversial. The aim of this review is to evaluate whether the use of MRAs improves diastolic function, functional capacity, and quality of life in patients with HFpEF. Methods: A systematic literature search of scientific databases was performed to identify studies comparing the use of MRAs to placebo or no treatment in adult patients with HFpEF (2000-2024; English; PROSPERO registration CRD42022300783). Data were meta-analysed using a random-effects model for overall effect size measured as the standardised mean difference. Results: Pooled data revealed a significant benefit of MRA use compared to the control in decreasing E/e' (SMD -0.21; 95% CI: -0.33 to -0.10, p = 0.00), with greater improvement seen with longer duration of treatment. A substantial reduction in systolic blood pressure (SMD -0.27; 95% CI: -0.53 to -0.02, p = 0.03) and diastolic blood pressure (SMD -0.18; 95% CI: -0.32 to -0.04, p = 0.01) was also noted. There was no significant difference in the 6 min walk distance, peak exercise capacity, or quality-of-life measures. Adverse events such as hyperkalaemia and worsening renal function were frequently reported in the MRA group. Conclusions: MRAs improve echocardiographic parameters of diastolic function and BP control; however, this did not translate into clinical outcomes of improved functional capacity or quality of life.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Journal of Clinical Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
6468
审稿时长
16.32 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Medicine (ISSN 2077-0383), is an international scientific open access journal, providing a platform for advances in health care/clinical practices, the study of direct observation of patients and general medical research. This multi-disciplinary journal is aimed at a wide audience of medical researchers and healthcare professionals. Unique features of this journal: manuscripts regarding original research and ideas will be particularly welcomed.JCM also accepts reviews, communications, and short notes. There is no limit to publication length: our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信