妊娠糖尿病后前驱糖尿病妇女产后早期的心理健康和代谢结局:梅林达试验的二次分析

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Yana Vanlaer, Caro Minschart, Karolijn Van den Keybus, Nele Myngheer, Toon Maes, Christophe De Block, Niels Bochanen, Inge Van Pottelbergh, Pascale Abrams, Wouter Vinck, Liesbeth Leuridan, Sabien Driessens, Jaak Billen, Christophe Matthys, Annick Bogaerts, Annouschka Laenen, Chantal Mathieu, Katrien Benhalima
{"title":"妊娠糖尿病后前驱糖尿病妇女产后早期的心理健康和代谢结局:梅林达试验的二次分析","authors":"Yana Vanlaer, Caro Minschart, Karolijn Van den Keybus, Nele Myngheer, Toon Maes, Christophe De Block, Niels Bochanen, Inge Van Pottelbergh, Pascale Abrams, Wouter Vinck, Liesbeth Leuridan, Sabien Driessens, Jaak Billen, Christophe Matthys, Annick Bogaerts, Annouschka Laenen, Chantal Mathieu, Katrien Benhalima","doi":"10.3390/jcm14103592","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Aims:</b> To examine the association between depressive symptoms and metabolic profile in women with prior gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and early postpartum prediabetes, and to explore whether a mobile-based lifestyle intervention affected mental health outcomes. <b>Methods:</b> Secondary, exploratory analysis of a multi-centric randomized controlled trial (MELINDA), evaluating a mobile-based lifestyle intervention versus standard follow-up (control group) in women with prediabetes after GDM. The analysis included 166 participants who completed the Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression (CES-D) questionnaire [score of ≥16 being suggestive for (sub)clinical depression] at baseline (6-16 weeks postpartum) and one year post-randomization. <b>Results:</b> At one year, 26.5% of women (n = 44) reported depressive symptoms, with no significant difference between the intervention and control groups (30.5% vs. 22.6%, <i>p</i> = 0.293). Women with depressive symptoms (symptomatic women) were younger (30.9 ± 4.9 vs. 32.5 ± 3.8 years, <i>p</i> = 0.033) and were less often highly educated (61.4% vs. 80.3%, <i>p</i> = 0.028). At baseline, symptomatic women had a higher rate of metabolic syndrome (38.6% vs. 21.9%, <i>p</i> = 0.044), higher LDL-cholesterol [3.2 ± 0.8 vs. 2.8 ± 0.8 mmol/L, <i>p</i> = 0.009], lower quality of life (lower SF-36 scores, <i>p</i> < 0.050) and a higher level of anxiety based on the STAI-6 questionnaire (14.5 ± 3.6 vs. 11.2 ± 2.6, <i>p</i> < 0.001). These differences persisted at one year postpartum with worse metabolic profile, more anxiety and lower quality of life in symptomatic women. <b>Conclusions:</b> Depressive symptoms are common in women with prediabetes in early postpartum after GDM and are associated with a persistent worse metabolic profile, increased anxiety and lower quality of life postpartum. The mobile-based lifestyle intervention did not improve mental health.</p>","PeriodicalId":15533,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Medicine","volume":"14 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mental Health and Metabolic Outcomes in Early Postpartum in Women with Prediabetes After Gestational Diabetes: A Secondary Analysis of the MELINDA Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Yana Vanlaer, Caro Minschart, Karolijn Van den Keybus, Nele Myngheer, Toon Maes, Christophe De Block, Niels Bochanen, Inge Van Pottelbergh, Pascale Abrams, Wouter Vinck, Liesbeth Leuridan, Sabien Driessens, Jaak Billen, Christophe Matthys, Annick Bogaerts, Annouschka Laenen, Chantal Mathieu, Katrien Benhalima\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/jcm14103592\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Aims:</b> To examine the association between depressive symptoms and metabolic profile in women with prior gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and early postpartum prediabetes, and to explore whether a mobile-based lifestyle intervention affected mental health outcomes. <b>Methods:</b> Secondary, exploratory analysis of a multi-centric randomized controlled trial (MELINDA), evaluating a mobile-based lifestyle intervention versus standard follow-up (control group) in women with prediabetes after GDM. The analysis included 166 participants who completed the Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression (CES-D) questionnaire [score of ≥16 being suggestive for (sub)clinical depression] at baseline (6-16 weeks postpartum) and one year post-randomization. <b>Results:</b> At one year, 26.5% of women (n = 44) reported depressive symptoms, with no significant difference between the intervention and control groups (30.5% vs. 22.6%, <i>p</i> = 0.293). Women with depressive symptoms (symptomatic women) were younger (30.9 ± 4.9 vs. 32.5 ± 3.8 years, <i>p</i> = 0.033) and were less often highly educated (61.4% vs. 80.3%, <i>p</i> = 0.028). At baseline, symptomatic women had a higher rate of metabolic syndrome (38.6% vs. 21.9%, <i>p</i> = 0.044), higher LDL-cholesterol [3.2 ± 0.8 vs. 2.8 ± 0.8 mmol/L, <i>p</i> = 0.009], lower quality of life (lower SF-36 scores, <i>p</i> < 0.050) and a higher level of anxiety based on the STAI-6 questionnaire (14.5 ± 3.6 vs. 11.2 ± 2.6, <i>p</i> < 0.001). These differences persisted at one year postpartum with worse metabolic profile, more anxiety and lower quality of life in symptomatic women. <b>Conclusions:</b> Depressive symptoms are common in women with prediabetes in early postpartum after GDM and are associated with a persistent worse metabolic profile, increased anxiety and lower quality of life postpartum. The mobile-based lifestyle intervention did not improve mental health.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15533,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Medicine\",\"volume\":\"14 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14103592\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14103592","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:研究妊娠糖尿病(GDM)和产后早期前驱糖尿病妇女抑郁症状与代谢特征之间的关系,并探讨以移动为基础的生活方式干预是否影响心理健康结局。方法:对一项多中心随机对照试验(MELINDA)进行二次探索性分析,评估基于移动的生活方式干预与标准随访(对照组)对GDM后糖尿病前期女性的影响。分析纳入了166名参与者,他们在基线(产后6-16周)和随机化后一年完成了流行病学研究中心抑郁症(CES-D)问卷调查[得分≥16提示(亚)临床抑郁症]。结果:一年后,26.5%的妇女(n = 44)报告抑郁症状,干预组和对照组之间无显著差异(30.5%对22.6%,p = 0.293)。有抑郁症状的女性(有症状的女性)较年轻(30.9±4.9岁对32.5±3.8岁,p = 0.033),受教育程度较低(61.4%对80.3%,p = 0.028)。基线时,有症状的女性代谢综合征发生率较高(38.6%对21.9%,p = 0.044),低密度脂蛋白胆固醇较高[3.2±0.8对2.8±0.8 mmol/L, p = 0.009],生活质量较低(SF-36评分较低,p < 0.050),基于sta -6问卷的焦虑水平较高(14.5±3.6对11.2±2.6,p < 0.001)。这些差异在产后一年内持续存在,有症状的妇女代谢谱更差,焦虑更多,生活质量更低。结论:抑郁症状在GDM后产后早期糖尿病前期妇女中很常见,并与持续的代谢谱恶化、焦虑增加和产后生活质量下降相关。以手机为基础的生活方式干预并没有改善心理健康。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mental Health and Metabolic Outcomes in Early Postpartum in Women with Prediabetes After Gestational Diabetes: A Secondary Analysis of the MELINDA Trial.

Aims: To examine the association between depressive symptoms and metabolic profile in women with prior gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and early postpartum prediabetes, and to explore whether a mobile-based lifestyle intervention affected mental health outcomes. Methods: Secondary, exploratory analysis of a multi-centric randomized controlled trial (MELINDA), evaluating a mobile-based lifestyle intervention versus standard follow-up (control group) in women with prediabetes after GDM. The analysis included 166 participants who completed the Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression (CES-D) questionnaire [score of ≥16 being suggestive for (sub)clinical depression] at baseline (6-16 weeks postpartum) and one year post-randomization. Results: At one year, 26.5% of women (n = 44) reported depressive symptoms, with no significant difference between the intervention and control groups (30.5% vs. 22.6%, p = 0.293). Women with depressive symptoms (symptomatic women) were younger (30.9 ± 4.9 vs. 32.5 ± 3.8 years, p = 0.033) and were less often highly educated (61.4% vs. 80.3%, p = 0.028). At baseline, symptomatic women had a higher rate of metabolic syndrome (38.6% vs. 21.9%, p = 0.044), higher LDL-cholesterol [3.2 ± 0.8 vs. 2.8 ± 0.8 mmol/L, p = 0.009], lower quality of life (lower SF-36 scores, p < 0.050) and a higher level of anxiety based on the STAI-6 questionnaire (14.5 ± 3.6 vs. 11.2 ± 2.6, p < 0.001). These differences persisted at one year postpartum with worse metabolic profile, more anxiety and lower quality of life in symptomatic women. Conclusions: Depressive symptoms are common in women with prediabetes in early postpartum after GDM and are associated with a persistent worse metabolic profile, increased anxiety and lower quality of life postpartum. The mobile-based lifestyle intervention did not improve mental health.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Journal of Clinical Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
6468
审稿时长
16.32 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Medicine (ISSN 2077-0383), is an international scientific open access journal, providing a platform for advances in health care/clinical practices, the study of direct observation of patients and general medical research. This multi-disciplinary journal is aimed at a wide audience of medical researchers and healthcare professionals. Unique features of this journal: manuscripts regarding original research and ideas will be particularly welcomed.JCM also accepts reviews, communications, and short notes. There is no limit to publication length: our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信