利用细胞外唾液生物标志物估计胃癌患者肿瘤负荷的诊断意义。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Sung Eun Oh, Jong Bae Seo, Jeongeun Noh, Sung Kim, Yong Kim, Ji Yeong An
{"title":"利用细胞外唾液生物标志物估计胃癌患者肿瘤负荷的诊断意义。","authors":"Sung Eun Oh, Jong Bae Seo, Jeongeun Noh, Sung Kim, Yong Kim, Ji Yeong An","doi":"10.3390/jcm14103596","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> We investigated the possibility of predicting tumor burden with salivary extracellular RNA (exRNA) biomarkers in gastric cancer patients. <b>Methods:</b> Saliva samples were prospectively collected from 50 gastric cancer patients who underwent gastrectomy with curative intent. Approximately 5 mL of saliva was collected before surgery and on the 5th to 7th days after surgery. The expression of three mRNAs (SPINK7, PPL, and SEMA4B) and two miRNAs (miR140-5p and miR301a) that were previously validated was determined by reverse transcription quantitative real-time PCR. <b>Results:</b> There were significant differences in the pre-operative expression of PPL (<i>p</i> = 0.025), SEMA4B (<i>p</i> = 0.012), and miR140-5p (<i>p</i> = 0.036) between pathologic stage I/II and III/IV groups. The area under the curve (AUC) of each respective multivariable model in predicting stage III/IV, which was adjusted for age and sex, was 75.4% (PPL), 82.5% (SEMA4B), and 75.5% (miR140-5p). In the multivariable model, including all three biomarkers, the AUC was 89.2%. On the other hand, none of the conventional tumor markers (CEA, CA19-9, and CA72-4) could predict tumor burden before surgery. The AUC of the multivariable model, including CEA, CA19-9, and CA72-4, was 67.2%, 66.2%, and 67.4%, respectively. When all three tumor markers were included in the multivariable model, the AUC was 70.5%. <b>Conclusions:</b> Noninvasively detected salivary biomarkers have been shown to have higher diagnostic accuracy than conventional tumor markers detected by invasive blood tests for estimating pre-operative tumor burden. This study demonstrates the potential utility of these biomarkers in pre-operative risk assessment and monitoring surgical treatment response to gastric cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":15533,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Medicine","volume":"14 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnostic Significance in Estimating Tumor Burden Using Extracellular Salivary Biomarkers in Gastric Cancer Patients.\",\"authors\":\"Sung Eun Oh, Jong Bae Seo, Jeongeun Noh, Sung Kim, Yong Kim, Ji Yeong An\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/jcm14103596\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> We investigated the possibility of predicting tumor burden with salivary extracellular RNA (exRNA) biomarkers in gastric cancer patients. <b>Methods:</b> Saliva samples were prospectively collected from 50 gastric cancer patients who underwent gastrectomy with curative intent. Approximately 5 mL of saliva was collected before surgery and on the 5th to 7th days after surgery. The expression of three mRNAs (SPINK7, PPL, and SEMA4B) and two miRNAs (miR140-5p and miR301a) that were previously validated was determined by reverse transcription quantitative real-time PCR. <b>Results:</b> There were significant differences in the pre-operative expression of PPL (<i>p</i> = 0.025), SEMA4B (<i>p</i> = 0.012), and miR140-5p (<i>p</i> = 0.036) between pathologic stage I/II and III/IV groups. The area under the curve (AUC) of each respective multivariable model in predicting stage III/IV, which was adjusted for age and sex, was 75.4% (PPL), 82.5% (SEMA4B), and 75.5% (miR140-5p). In the multivariable model, including all three biomarkers, the AUC was 89.2%. On the other hand, none of the conventional tumor markers (CEA, CA19-9, and CA72-4) could predict tumor burden before surgery. The AUC of the multivariable model, including CEA, CA19-9, and CA72-4, was 67.2%, 66.2%, and 67.4%, respectively. When all three tumor markers were included in the multivariable model, the AUC was 70.5%. <b>Conclusions:</b> Noninvasively detected salivary biomarkers have been shown to have higher diagnostic accuracy than conventional tumor markers detected by invasive blood tests for estimating pre-operative tumor burden. This study demonstrates the potential utility of these biomarkers in pre-operative risk assessment and monitoring surgical treatment response to gastric cancer.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15533,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Medicine\",\"volume\":\"14 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14103596\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14103596","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:我们研究了用唾液细胞外RNA (exRNA)生物标志物预测胃癌患者肿瘤负荷的可能性。方法:对50例以治愈为目的行胃切除术的胃癌患者进行前瞻性唾液采集。术前及术后第5 ~ 7天采集约5ml唾液。通过逆转录实时定量PCR检测先前验证的3种mrna (SPINK7、PPL和SEMA4B)和2种mirna (miR140-5p和miR301a)的表达。结果:术前PPL (p = 0.025)、SEMA4B (p = 0.012)、miR140-5p (p = 0.036)在病理分期I/II和III/IV组间的表达差异均有统计学意义。经年龄和性别调整后,各多变量模型预测III/IV期的曲线下面积(AUC)分别为75.4% (PPL)、82.5% (SEMA4B)和75.5% (miR140-5p)。在包括所有三种生物标志物的多变量模型中,AUC为89.2%。另一方面,术前常规肿瘤标志物(CEA、CA19-9、CA72-4)均不能预测肿瘤负荷。CEA、CA19-9、CA72-4多变量模型的AUC分别为67.2%、66.2%、67.4%。当所有三种肿瘤标志物都纳入多变量模型时,AUC为70.5%。结论:在评估术前肿瘤负荷方面,无创检测的唾液生物标志物比有创血液检查检测的传统肿瘤标志物具有更高的诊断准确性。这项研究证明了这些生物标志物在术前风险评估和监测胃癌手术治疗反应中的潜在效用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Diagnostic Significance in Estimating Tumor Burden Using Extracellular Salivary Biomarkers in Gastric Cancer Patients.

Background: We investigated the possibility of predicting tumor burden with salivary extracellular RNA (exRNA) biomarkers in gastric cancer patients. Methods: Saliva samples were prospectively collected from 50 gastric cancer patients who underwent gastrectomy with curative intent. Approximately 5 mL of saliva was collected before surgery and on the 5th to 7th days after surgery. The expression of three mRNAs (SPINK7, PPL, and SEMA4B) and two miRNAs (miR140-5p and miR301a) that were previously validated was determined by reverse transcription quantitative real-time PCR. Results: There were significant differences in the pre-operative expression of PPL (p = 0.025), SEMA4B (p = 0.012), and miR140-5p (p = 0.036) between pathologic stage I/II and III/IV groups. The area under the curve (AUC) of each respective multivariable model in predicting stage III/IV, which was adjusted for age and sex, was 75.4% (PPL), 82.5% (SEMA4B), and 75.5% (miR140-5p). In the multivariable model, including all three biomarkers, the AUC was 89.2%. On the other hand, none of the conventional tumor markers (CEA, CA19-9, and CA72-4) could predict tumor burden before surgery. The AUC of the multivariable model, including CEA, CA19-9, and CA72-4, was 67.2%, 66.2%, and 67.4%, respectively. When all three tumor markers were included in the multivariable model, the AUC was 70.5%. Conclusions: Noninvasively detected salivary biomarkers have been shown to have higher diagnostic accuracy than conventional tumor markers detected by invasive blood tests for estimating pre-operative tumor burden. This study demonstrates the potential utility of these biomarkers in pre-operative risk assessment and monitoring surgical treatment response to gastric cancer.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Journal of Clinical Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
6468
审稿时长
16.32 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Medicine (ISSN 2077-0383), is an international scientific open access journal, providing a platform for advances in health care/clinical practices, the study of direct observation of patients and general medical research. This multi-disciplinary journal is aimed at a wide audience of medical researchers and healthcare professionals. Unique features of this journal: manuscripts regarding original research and ideas will be particularly welcomed.JCM also accepts reviews, communications, and short notes. There is no limit to publication length: our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信