Sung Eun Oh, Jong Bae Seo, Jeongeun Noh, Sung Kim, Yong Kim, Ji Yeong An
{"title":"利用细胞外唾液生物标志物估计胃癌患者肿瘤负荷的诊断意义。","authors":"Sung Eun Oh, Jong Bae Seo, Jeongeun Noh, Sung Kim, Yong Kim, Ji Yeong An","doi":"10.3390/jcm14103596","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> We investigated the possibility of predicting tumor burden with salivary extracellular RNA (exRNA) biomarkers in gastric cancer patients. <b>Methods:</b> Saliva samples were prospectively collected from 50 gastric cancer patients who underwent gastrectomy with curative intent. Approximately 5 mL of saliva was collected before surgery and on the 5th to 7th days after surgery. The expression of three mRNAs (SPINK7, PPL, and SEMA4B) and two miRNAs (miR140-5p and miR301a) that were previously validated was determined by reverse transcription quantitative real-time PCR. <b>Results:</b> There were significant differences in the pre-operative expression of PPL (<i>p</i> = 0.025), SEMA4B (<i>p</i> = 0.012), and miR140-5p (<i>p</i> = 0.036) between pathologic stage I/II and III/IV groups. The area under the curve (AUC) of each respective multivariable model in predicting stage III/IV, which was adjusted for age and sex, was 75.4% (PPL), 82.5% (SEMA4B), and 75.5% (miR140-5p). In the multivariable model, including all three biomarkers, the AUC was 89.2%. On the other hand, none of the conventional tumor markers (CEA, CA19-9, and CA72-4) could predict tumor burden before surgery. The AUC of the multivariable model, including CEA, CA19-9, and CA72-4, was 67.2%, 66.2%, and 67.4%, respectively. When all three tumor markers were included in the multivariable model, the AUC was 70.5%. <b>Conclusions:</b> Noninvasively detected salivary biomarkers have been shown to have higher diagnostic accuracy than conventional tumor markers detected by invasive blood tests for estimating pre-operative tumor burden. This study demonstrates the potential utility of these biomarkers in pre-operative risk assessment and monitoring surgical treatment response to gastric cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":15533,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Medicine","volume":"14 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnostic Significance in Estimating Tumor Burden Using Extracellular Salivary Biomarkers in Gastric Cancer Patients.\",\"authors\":\"Sung Eun Oh, Jong Bae Seo, Jeongeun Noh, Sung Kim, Yong Kim, Ji Yeong An\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/jcm14103596\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> We investigated the possibility of predicting tumor burden with salivary extracellular RNA (exRNA) biomarkers in gastric cancer patients. <b>Methods:</b> Saliva samples were prospectively collected from 50 gastric cancer patients who underwent gastrectomy with curative intent. Approximately 5 mL of saliva was collected before surgery and on the 5th to 7th days after surgery. The expression of three mRNAs (SPINK7, PPL, and SEMA4B) and two miRNAs (miR140-5p and miR301a) that were previously validated was determined by reverse transcription quantitative real-time PCR. <b>Results:</b> There were significant differences in the pre-operative expression of PPL (<i>p</i> = 0.025), SEMA4B (<i>p</i> = 0.012), and miR140-5p (<i>p</i> = 0.036) between pathologic stage I/II and III/IV groups. The area under the curve (AUC) of each respective multivariable model in predicting stage III/IV, which was adjusted for age and sex, was 75.4% (PPL), 82.5% (SEMA4B), and 75.5% (miR140-5p). In the multivariable model, including all three biomarkers, the AUC was 89.2%. On the other hand, none of the conventional tumor markers (CEA, CA19-9, and CA72-4) could predict tumor burden before surgery. The AUC of the multivariable model, including CEA, CA19-9, and CA72-4, was 67.2%, 66.2%, and 67.4%, respectively. When all three tumor markers were included in the multivariable model, the AUC was 70.5%. <b>Conclusions:</b> Noninvasively detected salivary biomarkers have been shown to have higher diagnostic accuracy than conventional tumor markers detected by invasive blood tests for estimating pre-operative tumor burden. This study demonstrates the potential utility of these biomarkers in pre-operative risk assessment and monitoring surgical treatment response to gastric cancer.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15533,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Medicine\",\"volume\":\"14 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14103596\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14103596","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Diagnostic Significance in Estimating Tumor Burden Using Extracellular Salivary Biomarkers in Gastric Cancer Patients.
Background: We investigated the possibility of predicting tumor burden with salivary extracellular RNA (exRNA) biomarkers in gastric cancer patients. Methods: Saliva samples were prospectively collected from 50 gastric cancer patients who underwent gastrectomy with curative intent. Approximately 5 mL of saliva was collected before surgery and on the 5th to 7th days after surgery. The expression of three mRNAs (SPINK7, PPL, and SEMA4B) and two miRNAs (miR140-5p and miR301a) that were previously validated was determined by reverse transcription quantitative real-time PCR. Results: There were significant differences in the pre-operative expression of PPL (p = 0.025), SEMA4B (p = 0.012), and miR140-5p (p = 0.036) between pathologic stage I/II and III/IV groups. The area under the curve (AUC) of each respective multivariable model in predicting stage III/IV, which was adjusted for age and sex, was 75.4% (PPL), 82.5% (SEMA4B), and 75.5% (miR140-5p). In the multivariable model, including all three biomarkers, the AUC was 89.2%. On the other hand, none of the conventional tumor markers (CEA, CA19-9, and CA72-4) could predict tumor burden before surgery. The AUC of the multivariable model, including CEA, CA19-9, and CA72-4, was 67.2%, 66.2%, and 67.4%, respectively. When all three tumor markers were included in the multivariable model, the AUC was 70.5%. Conclusions: Noninvasively detected salivary biomarkers have been shown to have higher diagnostic accuracy than conventional tumor markers detected by invasive blood tests for estimating pre-operative tumor burden. This study demonstrates the potential utility of these biomarkers in pre-operative risk assessment and monitoring surgical treatment response to gastric cancer.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Clinical Medicine (ISSN 2077-0383), is an international scientific open access journal, providing a platform for advances in health care/clinical practices, the study of direct observation of patients and general medical research. This multi-disciplinary journal is aimed at a wide audience of medical researchers and healthcare professionals.
Unique features of this journal:
manuscripts regarding original research and ideas will be particularly welcomed.JCM also accepts reviews, communications, and short notes.
There is no limit to publication length: our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible.