糖尿病研究中的聚类分析:一项横断面研究增强的系统综述。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Binura Taurbekova, Radmir Sarsenov, Muhammad M Yaqoob, Kuralay Atageldiyeva, Yuliya Semenova, Siamac Fazli, Andrey Starodubov, Akmaral Angalieva, Antonio Sarria-Santamera
{"title":"糖尿病研究中的聚类分析:一项横断面研究增强的系统综述。","authors":"Binura Taurbekova, Radmir Sarsenov, Muhammad M Yaqoob, Kuralay Atageldiyeva, Yuliya Semenova, Siamac Fazli, Andrey Starodubov, Akmaral Angalieva, Antonio Sarria-Santamera","doi":"10.3390/jcm14103588","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Diabetes mellitus is a heterogeneous metabolic disorder that poses substantial challenges in the management of patients with diabetes. Emerging research underscores the potential of unsupervised cluster analysis as a promising methodological approach for unraveling the complex heterogeneity of diabetes mellitus. This systematic review evaluated the effectiveness of unsupervised cluster analysis in identifying diabetes phenotypes, elucidating the risks of diabetes-related complications, and distinguishing treatment responses. <b>Methods:</b> We searched MEDLINE Complete, PubMed, and Web of Science and reviewed forty-one relevant studies. Additionally, we conducted a cross-sectional study using K-means cluster analysis of real-world clinical data from 558 patients with diabetes. <b>Results:</b> A key finding was the consistent reproducibility of the five clusters across diverse populations, encompassing various patient origins and ethnic backgrounds. MOD and MARD were the most prevalent clusters, while SAID was the least prevalent. Subgroup analysis stratified by ethnic group indicated a higher prevalence of SIDD among individuals of Asian descent than among other ethnic groups. These clusters shared similar phenotypic traits and risk profiles for complications, with some variations in their distribution and key clinical variables. Notably, the SIRD subtype was associated with a wide spectrum of kidney-related clinical presentations. Alternative clustering techniques may reveal additional clinically relevant diabetes subtypes. Our cross-sectional study identified five subgroups, each with distinct profiles of glycemic control, lipid metabolism, blood pressure, and renal function. <b>Conclusions:</b> Overall, the results suggest that unsupervised cluster analysis holds promise for revealing clinically meaningful subgroups with distinct characteristics, complication risks, and treatment responses that may remain undetected using conventional approaches.</p>","PeriodicalId":15533,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Medicine","volume":"14 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cluster Analysis in Diabetes Research: A Systematic Review Enhanced by a Cross-Sectional Study.\",\"authors\":\"Binura Taurbekova, Radmir Sarsenov, Muhammad M Yaqoob, Kuralay Atageldiyeva, Yuliya Semenova, Siamac Fazli, Andrey Starodubov, Akmaral Angalieva, Antonio Sarria-Santamera\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/jcm14103588\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Diabetes mellitus is a heterogeneous metabolic disorder that poses substantial challenges in the management of patients with diabetes. Emerging research underscores the potential of unsupervised cluster analysis as a promising methodological approach for unraveling the complex heterogeneity of diabetes mellitus. This systematic review evaluated the effectiveness of unsupervised cluster analysis in identifying diabetes phenotypes, elucidating the risks of diabetes-related complications, and distinguishing treatment responses. <b>Methods:</b> We searched MEDLINE Complete, PubMed, and Web of Science and reviewed forty-one relevant studies. Additionally, we conducted a cross-sectional study using K-means cluster analysis of real-world clinical data from 558 patients with diabetes. <b>Results:</b> A key finding was the consistent reproducibility of the five clusters across diverse populations, encompassing various patient origins and ethnic backgrounds. MOD and MARD were the most prevalent clusters, while SAID was the least prevalent. Subgroup analysis stratified by ethnic group indicated a higher prevalence of SIDD among individuals of Asian descent than among other ethnic groups. These clusters shared similar phenotypic traits and risk profiles for complications, with some variations in their distribution and key clinical variables. Notably, the SIRD subtype was associated with a wide spectrum of kidney-related clinical presentations. Alternative clustering techniques may reveal additional clinically relevant diabetes subtypes. Our cross-sectional study identified five subgroups, each with distinct profiles of glycemic control, lipid metabolism, blood pressure, and renal function. <b>Conclusions:</b> Overall, the results suggest that unsupervised cluster analysis holds promise for revealing clinically meaningful subgroups with distinct characteristics, complication risks, and treatment responses that may remain undetected using conventional approaches.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15533,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Medicine\",\"volume\":\"14 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14103588\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14103588","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:糖尿病是一种异质性代谢紊乱,对糖尿病患者的管理提出了重大挑战。新兴研究强调了无监督聚类分析作为揭示糖尿病复杂异质性的一种有前途的方法学方法的潜力。本系统综述评估了无监督聚类分析在识别糖尿病表型、阐明糖尿病相关并发症风险和区分治疗反应方面的有效性。方法:检索MEDLINE Complete、PubMed和Web of Science,回顾41项相关研究。此外,我们对558名糖尿病患者的真实临床数据进行了k均值聚类分析。结果:一个关键的发现是五个集群在不同人群中一致的可重复性,包括不同的患者起源和种族背景。MOD和MARD是最常见的集群,而SAID是最不常见的集群。按种族分层的亚组分析表明,亚洲后裔的SIDD患病率高于其他种族。这些群集具有相似的表型特征和并发症的风险概况,但在其分布和关键临床变量方面存在一些差异。值得注意的是,SIRD亚型与广泛的肾脏相关临床表现相关。其他的聚类技术可能揭示其他临床相关的糖尿病亚型。我们的横断面研究确定了五个亚组,每个亚组都有不同的血糖控制、脂质代谢、血压和肾功能。结论:总体而言,结果表明,无监督聚类分析有望揭示具有不同特征、并发症风险和治疗反应的临床有意义的亚组,这些亚组可能使用传统方法无法检测到。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cluster Analysis in Diabetes Research: A Systematic Review Enhanced by a Cross-Sectional Study.

Background: Diabetes mellitus is a heterogeneous metabolic disorder that poses substantial challenges in the management of patients with diabetes. Emerging research underscores the potential of unsupervised cluster analysis as a promising methodological approach for unraveling the complex heterogeneity of diabetes mellitus. This systematic review evaluated the effectiveness of unsupervised cluster analysis in identifying diabetes phenotypes, elucidating the risks of diabetes-related complications, and distinguishing treatment responses. Methods: We searched MEDLINE Complete, PubMed, and Web of Science and reviewed forty-one relevant studies. Additionally, we conducted a cross-sectional study using K-means cluster analysis of real-world clinical data from 558 patients with diabetes. Results: A key finding was the consistent reproducibility of the five clusters across diverse populations, encompassing various patient origins and ethnic backgrounds. MOD and MARD were the most prevalent clusters, while SAID was the least prevalent. Subgroup analysis stratified by ethnic group indicated a higher prevalence of SIDD among individuals of Asian descent than among other ethnic groups. These clusters shared similar phenotypic traits and risk profiles for complications, with some variations in their distribution and key clinical variables. Notably, the SIRD subtype was associated with a wide spectrum of kidney-related clinical presentations. Alternative clustering techniques may reveal additional clinically relevant diabetes subtypes. Our cross-sectional study identified five subgroups, each with distinct profiles of glycemic control, lipid metabolism, blood pressure, and renal function. Conclusions: Overall, the results suggest that unsupervised cluster analysis holds promise for revealing clinically meaningful subgroups with distinct characteristics, complication risks, and treatment responses that may remain undetected using conventional approaches.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Journal of Clinical Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
6468
审稿时长
16.32 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Medicine (ISSN 2077-0383), is an international scientific open access journal, providing a platform for advances in health care/clinical practices, the study of direct observation of patients and general medical research. This multi-disciplinary journal is aimed at a wide audience of medical researchers and healthcare professionals. Unique features of this journal: manuscripts regarding original research and ideas will be particularly welcomed.JCM also accepts reviews, communications, and short notes. There is no limit to publication length: our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信