探索数字双胞胎在癌症治疗中的潜力:综述的叙述性回顾。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Daniele Giansanti, Sandra Morelli
{"title":"探索数字双胞胎在癌症治疗中的潜力:综述的叙述性回顾。","authors":"Daniele Giansanti, Sandra Morelli","doi":"10.3390/jcm14103574","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Digital twin (DT) technology, integrated with artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML), holds significant potential to transform oncology care. By creating dynamic virtual replicas of patients, DTs allow clinicians to simulate disease progression and treatment responses, offering a personalized approach to cancer treatment. <b>Aim:</b> This narrative review aimed to synthesize existing review studies on the application of digital twins in oncology, focusing on their potential benefits, challenges, and ethical considerations. <b>Methods:</b> The narrative review of reviews (NRR) followed a structured selection process using a standardized checklist. Searches were conducted in PubMed and Scopus with a predefined query on digital twins in oncology. Reviews were prioritized based on their synthesis of prior studies, with a focus on digital twins in oncology. Studies were evaluated using quality parameters (clear rationale, research design, methodology, results, conclusions, and conflict disclosure). Only studies with scores above a prefixed threshold and disclosed conflicts of interest were included in the final synthesis; seventeen studies were selected. <b>Results and Discussion:</b> DTs in oncology offer advantages such as enhanced decision-making, optimized treatment regimens, and improved clinical trial design. Moreover, economic forecasts suggest that the integration of digital twins into healthcare systems may significantly reduce treatment costs and drive growth in the precision medicine market. However, challenges include data integration issues, the complexity of biological modeling, and the need for robust computational resources. A comparison to cutting-edge research studies contributes to this direction and confirms also that ethical and legal considerations, particularly concerning AI, data privacy, and accountability, remain significant barriers. <b>Conclusions:</b> The integration of digital twins in oncology holds great promise, but requires careful attention to ethical, legal, and operational challenges. Multidisciplinary efforts, supported by evolving regulatory frameworks like those in the EU, are essential for ensuring responsible and effective implementation to improve patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":15533,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Medicine","volume":"14 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12111985/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring the Potential of Digital Twins in Cancer Treatment: A Narrative Review of Reviews.\",\"authors\":\"Daniele Giansanti, Sandra Morelli\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/jcm14103574\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Digital twin (DT) technology, integrated with artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML), holds significant potential to transform oncology care. By creating dynamic virtual replicas of patients, DTs allow clinicians to simulate disease progression and treatment responses, offering a personalized approach to cancer treatment. <b>Aim:</b> This narrative review aimed to synthesize existing review studies on the application of digital twins in oncology, focusing on their potential benefits, challenges, and ethical considerations. <b>Methods:</b> The narrative review of reviews (NRR) followed a structured selection process using a standardized checklist. Searches were conducted in PubMed and Scopus with a predefined query on digital twins in oncology. Reviews were prioritized based on their synthesis of prior studies, with a focus on digital twins in oncology. Studies were evaluated using quality parameters (clear rationale, research design, methodology, results, conclusions, and conflict disclosure). Only studies with scores above a prefixed threshold and disclosed conflicts of interest were included in the final synthesis; seventeen studies were selected. <b>Results and Discussion:</b> DTs in oncology offer advantages such as enhanced decision-making, optimized treatment regimens, and improved clinical trial design. Moreover, economic forecasts suggest that the integration of digital twins into healthcare systems may significantly reduce treatment costs and drive growth in the precision medicine market. However, challenges include data integration issues, the complexity of biological modeling, and the need for robust computational resources. A comparison to cutting-edge research studies contributes to this direction and confirms also that ethical and legal considerations, particularly concerning AI, data privacy, and accountability, remain significant barriers. <b>Conclusions:</b> The integration of digital twins in oncology holds great promise, but requires careful attention to ethical, legal, and operational challenges. Multidisciplinary efforts, supported by evolving regulatory frameworks like those in the EU, are essential for ensuring responsible and effective implementation to improve patient outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15533,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Medicine\",\"volume\":\"14 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12111985/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14103574\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14103574","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:数字孪生(DT)技术与人工智能(AI)和机器学习(ML)相结合,具有改变肿瘤治疗的巨大潜力。通过创建患者的动态虚拟复制品,DTs允许临床医生模拟疾病进展和治疗反应,为癌症治疗提供个性化的方法。目的:这篇叙述性综述旨在综合现有的关于数字双胞胎在肿瘤学应用的综述研究,重点关注其潜在的益处、挑战和伦理考虑。方法:采用标准化的检查表,采用结构化的选择过程对文献进行叙述性评价(NRR)。在PubMed和Scopus中进行了搜索,并预先定义了肿瘤学中的数字双胞胎。综述的优先顺序是基于对先前研究的综合,重点是肿瘤学中的数字双胞胎。使用质量参数(明确的基本原理、研究设计、方法、结果、结论和冲突披露)对研究进行评估。只有得分高于预设阈值并披露了利益冲突的研究才被纳入最终综合;选取了17项研究。结果与讨论:DTs在肿瘤学领域具有决策能力增强、治疗方案优化、临床试验设计改进等优势。此外,经济预测表明,将数字孪生体整合到医疗保健系统中可能会显著降低治疗成本,并推动精准医疗市场的增长。然而,挑战包括数据集成问题、生物建模的复杂性以及对强大计算资源的需求。与前沿研究的比较有助于这一方向,也证实了伦理和法律方面的考虑,特别是在人工智能、数据隐私和问责制方面,仍然是重大障碍。结论:数字双胞胎在肿瘤学领域的整合前景广阔,但需要仔细关注伦理、法律和操作方面的挑战。在欧盟等不断发展的监管框架的支持下,多学科努力对于确保负责任和有效地实施以改善患者预后至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploring the Potential of Digital Twins in Cancer Treatment: A Narrative Review of Reviews.

Background: Digital twin (DT) technology, integrated with artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML), holds significant potential to transform oncology care. By creating dynamic virtual replicas of patients, DTs allow clinicians to simulate disease progression and treatment responses, offering a personalized approach to cancer treatment. Aim: This narrative review aimed to synthesize existing review studies on the application of digital twins in oncology, focusing on their potential benefits, challenges, and ethical considerations. Methods: The narrative review of reviews (NRR) followed a structured selection process using a standardized checklist. Searches were conducted in PubMed and Scopus with a predefined query on digital twins in oncology. Reviews were prioritized based on their synthesis of prior studies, with a focus on digital twins in oncology. Studies were evaluated using quality parameters (clear rationale, research design, methodology, results, conclusions, and conflict disclosure). Only studies with scores above a prefixed threshold and disclosed conflicts of interest were included in the final synthesis; seventeen studies were selected. Results and Discussion: DTs in oncology offer advantages such as enhanced decision-making, optimized treatment regimens, and improved clinical trial design. Moreover, economic forecasts suggest that the integration of digital twins into healthcare systems may significantly reduce treatment costs and drive growth in the precision medicine market. However, challenges include data integration issues, the complexity of biological modeling, and the need for robust computational resources. A comparison to cutting-edge research studies contributes to this direction and confirms also that ethical and legal considerations, particularly concerning AI, data privacy, and accountability, remain significant barriers. Conclusions: The integration of digital twins in oncology holds great promise, but requires careful attention to ethical, legal, and operational challenges. Multidisciplinary efforts, supported by evolving regulatory frameworks like those in the EU, are essential for ensuring responsible and effective implementation to improve patient outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Journal of Clinical Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
6468
审稿时长
16.32 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Medicine (ISSN 2077-0383), is an international scientific open access journal, providing a platform for advances in health care/clinical practices, the study of direct observation of patients and general medical research. This multi-disciplinary journal is aimed at a wide audience of medical researchers and healthcare professionals. Unique features of this journal: manuscripts regarding original research and ideas will be particularly welcomed.JCM also accepts reviews, communications, and short notes. There is no limit to publication length: our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信