单切口腹腔镜在腹部创伤中的应用:目前的证据、临床应用和不断发展的角色——叙述性综述。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Sebeom Jeon, Kang-Kook Choi
{"title":"单切口腹腔镜在腹部创伤中的应用:目前的证据、临床应用和不断发展的角色——叙述性综述。","authors":"Sebeom Jeon, Kang-Kook Choi","doi":"10.3390/jcm14103610","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives:</b> Laparoscopic surgery plays a central role in the management of abdominal trauma, particularly in patients with hemodynamic stability. Recently, single-port laparoscopic surgery (SPLS) has emerged as a technique that further reduces access-related trauma while preserving the benefits of conventional laparoscopy. Thus, this review aimed to examine the current landscape of SPLS in trauma care, summarizing available clinical data and highlighting practical considerations for its use. Despite the limited experience, early evidence suggests that SPLS can achieve diagnostic and therapeutic outcomes comparable to those achieved by multi-port approaches in selected cases. Particular attention is given to a hybrid method that combines intracorporeal assessment with extracorporeal small bowel examination and repair through a single umbilical incision. This technique offers a pragmatic balance between thorough exploration and minimal invasiveness. <b>Methods</b>: We searched PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar through December 2023 using the terms \"single-port laparoscopy\", \"single-incision laparoscopic surgery\", \"trauma laparoscopy\", and related phrases. Case reports, case series, comparative studies, and reviews describing single-incision laparoscopic surgery in trauma were included in this narrative analysis. <b>Results</b>: SPLS may offer advantages in terms of postoperative pain, wound complications, and cosmetic outcomes, especially in younger patients. As familiarity with the approach increases and dedicated instrumentation becomes more accessible, its role in trauma protocols may expand. <b>Conclusions</b>: Further prospective research is needed to define long-term outcomes, refine patient selection, and integrate SPLS more systematically into trauma care protocols.</p>","PeriodicalId":15533,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Medicine","volume":"14 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12112246/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Single-Incision Laparoscopy in Abdominal Trauma: Current Evidence, Clinical Applications, and Evolving Role-A Narrative Review.\",\"authors\":\"Sebeom Jeon, Kang-Kook Choi\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/jcm14103610\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives:</b> Laparoscopic surgery plays a central role in the management of abdominal trauma, particularly in patients with hemodynamic stability. Recently, single-port laparoscopic surgery (SPLS) has emerged as a technique that further reduces access-related trauma while preserving the benefits of conventional laparoscopy. Thus, this review aimed to examine the current landscape of SPLS in trauma care, summarizing available clinical data and highlighting practical considerations for its use. Despite the limited experience, early evidence suggests that SPLS can achieve diagnostic and therapeutic outcomes comparable to those achieved by multi-port approaches in selected cases. Particular attention is given to a hybrid method that combines intracorporeal assessment with extracorporeal small bowel examination and repair through a single umbilical incision. This technique offers a pragmatic balance between thorough exploration and minimal invasiveness. <b>Methods</b>: We searched PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar through December 2023 using the terms \\\"single-port laparoscopy\\\", \\\"single-incision laparoscopic surgery\\\", \\\"trauma laparoscopy\\\", and related phrases. Case reports, case series, comparative studies, and reviews describing single-incision laparoscopic surgery in trauma were included in this narrative analysis. <b>Results</b>: SPLS may offer advantages in terms of postoperative pain, wound complications, and cosmetic outcomes, especially in younger patients. As familiarity with the approach increases and dedicated instrumentation becomes more accessible, its role in trauma protocols may expand. <b>Conclusions</b>: Further prospective research is needed to define long-term outcomes, refine patient selection, and integrate SPLS more systematically into trauma care protocols.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15533,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Medicine\",\"volume\":\"14 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12112246/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14103610\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14103610","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景/目的:腹腔镜手术在腹部创伤的治疗中起着核心作用,特别是在血液动力学稳定的患者中。最近,单孔腹腔镜手术(SPLS)作为一种技术出现,在保留传统腹腔镜的优点的同时,进一步减少了与通道相关的创伤。因此,本综述旨在研究SPLS在创伤护理中的现状,总结现有的临床数据,并强调其使用的实际考虑。尽管经验有限,但早期证据表明,在选定的病例中,SPLS可以达到与多端口入路相当的诊断和治疗结果。特别注意的是结合体内评估和体外小肠检查的混合方法,并通过单个脐切口进行修复。这种技术在彻底的探索和最小的侵入之间提供了一种实用的平衡。方法:我们检索PubMed、Scopus、Web of Science和谷歌Scholar,检索截止到2023年12月,检索词为“单孔腹腔镜”、“单切口腹腔镜手术”、“创伤腹腔镜”及相关短语。病例报告、病例系列、比较研究以及创伤单切口腹腔镜手术的回顾都被纳入了这篇叙述性分析。结果:SPLS在术后疼痛、伤口并发症和美容结果方面可能具有优势,特别是在年轻患者中。随着对入路的熟悉程度的提高和专用仪器的普及,其在创伤治疗方案中的作用可能会扩大。结论:需要进一步的前瞻性研究来确定长期结果,完善患者选择,并将SPLS更系统地纳入创伤护理方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Single-Incision Laparoscopy in Abdominal Trauma: Current Evidence, Clinical Applications, and Evolving Role-A Narrative Review.

Background/Objectives: Laparoscopic surgery plays a central role in the management of abdominal trauma, particularly in patients with hemodynamic stability. Recently, single-port laparoscopic surgery (SPLS) has emerged as a technique that further reduces access-related trauma while preserving the benefits of conventional laparoscopy. Thus, this review aimed to examine the current landscape of SPLS in trauma care, summarizing available clinical data and highlighting practical considerations for its use. Despite the limited experience, early evidence suggests that SPLS can achieve diagnostic and therapeutic outcomes comparable to those achieved by multi-port approaches in selected cases. Particular attention is given to a hybrid method that combines intracorporeal assessment with extracorporeal small bowel examination and repair through a single umbilical incision. This technique offers a pragmatic balance between thorough exploration and minimal invasiveness. Methods: We searched PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar through December 2023 using the terms "single-port laparoscopy", "single-incision laparoscopic surgery", "trauma laparoscopy", and related phrases. Case reports, case series, comparative studies, and reviews describing single-incision laparoscopic surgery in trauma were included in this narrative analysis. Results: SPLS may offer advantages in terms of postoperative pain, wound complications, and cosmetic outcomes, especially in younger patients. As familiarity with the approach increases and dedicated instrumentation becomes more accessible, its role in trauma protocols may expand. Conclusions: Further prospective research is needed to define long-term outcomes, refine patient selection, and integrate SPLS more systematically into trauma care protocols.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Journal of Clinical Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
6468
审稿时长
16.32 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Medicine (ISSN 2077-0383), is an international scientific open access journal, providing a platform for advances in health care/clinical practices, the study of direct observation of patients and general medical research. This multi-disciplinary journal is aimed at a wide audience of medical researchers and healthcare professionals. Unique features of this journal: manuscripts regarding original research and ideas will be particularly welcomed.JCM also accepts reviews, communications, and short notes. There is no limit to publication length: our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信