{"title":"医疗保健可及性、性别、致幻剂及其对痛苦的影响","authors":"Sean Matthew Viña","doi":"10.3390/healthcare13101158","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b>: Structural inequalities in healthcare access may influence how individuals experience the psychological effects of psychedelic substances, potentially limiting positive outcomes among vulnerable populations. <b>Objectives</b>: This study uses data from the National Survey on Drug Use and Health (2008-2019; N = 484,732) to examine how public and private health insurance moderate the association between psychedelic use and psychological distress. <b>Methods:</b> Ordinary least squares (OLS) regression models indicate that private health insurance is associated with lower psychological distress, while public insurance is associated with higher distress. <b>Results:</b> Psychedelic use moderates these associations, reinforcing the protective pattern linked to private insurance and intensifying distress among those with public coverage. These patterns vary by gender: among men, psychedelic use does not significantly alter the association between insurance type and distress; among women, however, psilocybin and lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD) use are associated with lower distress among those with private insurance, but with higher distress among those with public insurance. <b>Conclusions:</b> These findings indicate that while psychedelics may interact with existing healthcare conditions, they do not mitigate structural inequalities and may, in some cases, exacerbate them.</p>","PeriodicalId":12977,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare","volume":"13 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Relationships Between Healthcare Access, Gender, and Psychedelics and Their Effects on Distress.\",\"authors\":\"Sean Matthew Viña\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/healthcare13101158\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background</b>: Structural inequalities in healthcare access may influence how individuals experience the psychological effects of psychedelic substances, potentially limiting positive outcomes among vulnerable populations. <b>Objectives</b>: This study uses data from the National Survey on Drug Use and Health (2008-2019; N = 484,732) to examine how public and private health insurance moderate the association between psychedelic use and psychological distress. <b>Methods:</b> Ordinary least squares (OLS) regression models indicate that private health insurance is associated with lower psychological distress, while public insurance is associated with higher distress. <b>Results:</b> Psychedelic use moderates these associations, reinforcing the protective pattern linked to private insurance and intensifying distress among those with public coverage. These patterns vary by gender: among men, psychedelic use does not significantly alter the association between insurance type and distress; among women, however, psilocybin and lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD) use are associated with lower distress among those with private insurance, but with higher distress among those with public insurance. <b>Conclusions:</b> These findings indicate that while psychedelics may interact with existing healthcare conditions, they do not mitigate structural inequalities and may, in some cases, exacerbate them.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12977,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Healthcare\",\"volume\":\"13 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Healthcare\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13101158\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13101158","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Relationships Between Healthcare Access, Gender, and Psychedelics and Their Effects on Distress.
Background: Structural inequalities in healthcare access may influence how individuals experience the psychological effects of psychedelic substances, potentially limiting positive outcomes among vulnerable populations. Objectives: This study uses data from the National Survey on Drug Use and Health (2008-2019; N = 484,732) to examine how public and private health insurance moderate the association between psychedelic use and psychological distress. Methods: Ordinary least squares (OLS) regression models indicate that private health insurance is associated with lower psychological distress, while public insurance is associated with higher distress. Results: Psychedelic use moderates these associations, reinforcing the protective pattern linked to private insurance and intensifying distress among those with public coverage. These patterns vary by gender: among men, psychedelic use does not significantly alter the association between insurance type and distress; among women, however, psilocybin and lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD) use are associated with lower distress among those with private insurance, but with higher distress among those with public insurance. Conclusions: These findings indicate that while psychedelics may interact with existing healthcare conditions, they do not mitigate structural inequalities and may, in some cases, exacerbate them.
期刊介绍:
Healthcare (ISSN 2227-9032) is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal (free for readers), which publishes original theoretical and empirical work in the interdisciplinary area of all aspects of medicine and health care research. Healthcare publishes Original Research Articles, Reviews, Case Reports, Research Notes and Short Communications. We encourage researchers to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. For theoretical papers, full details of proofs must be provided so that the results can be checked; for experimental papers, full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Additionally, electronic files or software regarding the full details of the calculations, experimental procedure, etc., can be deposited along with the publication as “Supplementary Material”.