医疗联盟能弥合中国医疗不平等的鸿沟吗?倾向得分匹配分析。

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Chong Feng, Yusheng Chen, WeiWei Wang, Shuzhen Chen
{"title":"医疗联盟能弥合中国医疗不平等的鸿沟吗?倾向得分匹配分析。","authors":"Chong Feng, Yusheng Chen, WeiWei Wang, Shuzhen Chen","doi":"10.1093/heapol/czaf031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>While health is a fundamental right, health inequities between urban and rural residents remain significant in China. Medical consortia aim to bridge this gap by providing equitable and affordable healthcare. However, their effectiveness in enhancing health equity remains underexplored. This study aims to explore whether medical consortia have mitigated health inequity between urban and rural residents. We employed propensity score matching to mitigate selection bias among 9,918 electronic medical records. We focused on two key areas: the effectiveness of medical consortia in reducing healthcare burdens and their influence on health equity, as indicated by the disparities in medical expenses between urban and rural residents. To obtain more detailed insights, we segmented medical expenses into low, medium, and high categories for both urban and rural residents and examined how medical consortia differentially affect health equity across these segments. Moreover, we evaluated whether the differences in referral effects on medical expenses between urban and rural residents can be explained by their varying disease structures and age distributions. We found that medical consortia can significantly reduce the medical burden on populations, but have limitations in improving health equity. The findings highlight a substantial reduction in medical expenses for urban populations. However, no significant reduction was observed in rural populations, with the low-medical-expense group experiencing an increased healthcare burden following the implementation of medical consortia. These findings are robust across various matching methods. Despite reducing healthcare burdens, medical consortia have not equalised health outcomes between urban and rural residents. Significant differences in the disease and age structures exist between urban and rural residents, which may account for the differing causal effects observed between them. Policymakers must prioritise health equity in healthcare reform and consider targeted interventions to address the distinct healthcare challenges of different socioeconomic groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":12926,"journal":{"name":"Health policy and planning","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can Medical Consortiums Bridge the Gap in Health Inequity in China? A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Chong Feng, Yusheng Chen, WeiWei Wang, Shuzhen Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/heapol/czaf031\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>While health is a fundamental right, health inequities between urban and rural residents remain significant in China. Medical consortia aim to bridge this gap by providing equitable and affordable healthcare. However, their effectiveness in enhancing health equity remains underexplored. This study aims to explore whether medical consortia have mitigated health inequity between urban and rural residents. We employed propensity score matching to mitigate selection bias among 9,918 electronic medical records. We focused on two key areas: the effectiveness of medical consortia in reducing healthcare burdens and their influence on health equity, as indicated by the disparities in medical expenses between urban and rural residents. To obtain more detailed insights, we segmented medical expenses into low, medium, and high categories for both urban and rural residents and examined how medical consortia differentially affect health equity across these segments. Moreover, we evaluated whether the differences in referral effects on medical expenses between urban and rural residents can be explained by their varying disease structures and age distributions. We found that medical consortia can significantly reduce the medical burden on populations, but have limitations in improving health equity. The findings highlight a substantial reduction in medical expenses for urban populations. However, no significant reduction was observed in rural populations, with the low-medical-expense group experiencing an increased healthcare burden following the implementation of medical consortia. These findings are robust across various matching methods. Despite reducing healthcare burdens, medical consortia have not equalised health outcomes between urban and rural residents. Significant differences in the disease and age structures exist between urban and rural residents, which may account for the differing causal effects observed between them. Policymakers must prioritise health equity in healthcare reform and consider targeted interventions to address the distinct healthcare challenges of different socioeconomic groups.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12926,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health policy and planning\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health policy and planning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czaf031\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health policy and planning","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czaf031","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虽然健康是一项基本权利,但在中国,城乡居民之间的健康不平等仍然很严重。医疗联盟旨在通过提供公平和负担得起的医疗保健来弥合这一差距。然而,它们在促进卫生公平方面的有效性仍未得到充分探讨。本研究旨在探讨医疗联合体是否缓解了城乡居民之间的健康不平等。我们采用倾向得分匹配来减轻9,918份电子病历的选择偏差。我们重点研究了两个关键领域:医疗联合体在减轻医疗负担方面的有效性,以及它们对卫生公平的影响,这是城乡居民医疗费用差异所表明的。为了获得更详细的见解,我们将城市和农村居民的医疗费用分为低、中、高三类,并研究了医疗联盟如何在这些细分市场中影响医疗公平的差异。此外,我们还评估了城乡居民转诊对医疗费用影响的差异是否可以用他们不同的疾病结构和年龄分布来解释。我们发现,医疗联合体可以显著减轻人群的医疗负担,但在提高卫生公平方面存在局限性。研究结果强调,城市人口的医疗费用大幅下降。然而,在农村人口中没有观察到明显的减少,医疗费用低的群体在实施医疗联盟后医疗负担增加。这些发现在各种匹配方法中都是稳健的。尽管减轻了医疗负担,但医疗联盟并没有使城乡居民的健康结果平等。城乡居民在疾病和年龄结构上存在显著差异,这可能是城乡居民之间观察到的不同因果效应的原因。决策者必须在医疗改革中优先考虑卫生公平,并考虑有针对性的干预措施,以解决不同社会经济群体的独特医疗挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Can Medical Consortiums Bridge the Gap in Health Inequity in China? A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.

While health is a fundamental right, health inequities between urban and rural residents remain significant in China. Medical consortia aim to bridge this gap by providing equitable and affordable healthcare. However, their effectiveness in enhancing health equity remains underexplored. This study aims to explore whether medical consortia have mitigated health inequity between urban and rural residents. We employed propensity score matching to mitigate selection bias among 9,918 electronic medical records. We focused on two key areas: the effectiveness of medical consortia in reducing healthcare burdens and their influence on health equity, as indicated by the disparities in medical expenses between urban and rural residents. To obtain more detailed insights, we segmented medical expenses into low, medium, and high categories for both urban and rural residents and examined how medical consortia differentially affect health equity across these segments. Moreover, we evaluated whether the differences in referral effects on medical expenses between urban and rural residents can be explained by their varying disease structures and age distributions. We found that medical consortia can significantly reduce the medical burden on populations, but have limitations in improving health equity. The findings highlight a substantial reduction in medical expenses for urban populations. However, no significant reduction was observed in rural populations, with the low-medical-expense group experiencing an increased healthcare burden following the implementation of medical consortia. These findings are robust across various matching methods. Despite reducing healthcare burdens, medical consortia have not equalised health outcomes between urban and rural residents. Significant differences in the disease and age structures exist between urban and rural residents, which may account for the differing causal effects observed between them. Policymakers must prioritise health equity in healthcare reform and consider targeted interventions to address the distinct healthcare challenges of different socioeconomic groups.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health policy and planning
Health policy and planning 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
3.10%
发文量
98
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Health Policy and Planning publishes health policy and systems research focusing on low- and middle-income countries. Our journal provides an international forum for publishing original and high-quality research that addresses questions pertinent to policy-makers, public health researchers and practitioners. Health Policy and Planning is published 10 times a year.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信