{"title":"超声引导注射程序确保卫生和安全的临床研究综述。","authors":"Yujin Kweon, Goeun Jeong, Sungha Kim, Changsop Yang, Eunbyul Cho, Jungtae Leem","doi":"10.3390/healthcare13101165","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b>: Ultrasound guidance is widely used to enhance injection accuracy and safety. However, ultrasound-guided procedures require complex manipulation of both probe and needle. This simultaneous manipulation while maintaining sterility necessitates specific infection prevention protocols. This scoping review aimed to systematically investigate hygiene and safety procedures reported in clinical studies of ultrasound-guided injections. <b>Methods</b>: Following the Joanna Briggs Institute guideline, we conducted a systematic search of four databases (two English and two Korean) from inception to November 2023. Studies describing ultrasound-guided injection procedures with skin disinfection protocols were included. The extracted procedures were categorized and analyzed according to their timing (before, during, and after injection) and purpose. <b>Results</b>: Among 1728 studies identified, 86 met inclusion criteria. Notable variations were found in infection prevention practices, with only 5.81% reporting probe disinfection procedures and 27.91% documenting sterile probe cover use. Skin disinfection methods also varied, with iodophors (20.93%) and alcohol-based solutions (11.63%) being most common. Of studies describing ultrasound coupling agent procedures (26.74%), less than 20% specifically mentioned using sterile transmission agents. Documentation of temporal aspects of infection prevention was limited, with most studies not addressing precise timing of disinfection procedures or post-procedure probe reprocessing protocols. <b>Conclusions</b>: Our findings reveal considerable variation in infection prevention practices during ultrasound-guided injections and highlight gaps in documentation of hygiene protocols. These findings suggest the need for standardized, evidence-based protocols tailored to different anatomical sites and types of injections. Further research through expert consensus and real-world implementation is needed to develop and validate comprehensive guidelines for clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":12977,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare","volume":"13 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Scoping Review of Clinical Studies on Procedures of Ultrasound-Guided Injection to Ensure Hygiene and Safety.\",\"authors\":\"Yujin Kweon, Goeun Jeong, Sungha Kim, Changsop Yang, Eunbyul Cho, Jungtae Leem\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/healthcare13101165\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background</b>: Ultrasound guidance is widely used to enhance injection accuracy and safety. However, ultrasound-guided procedures require complex manipulation of both probe and needle. This simultaneous manipulation while maintaining sterility necessitates specific infection prevention protocols. This scoping review aimed to systematically investigate hygiene and safety procedures reported in clinical studies of ultrasound-guided injections. <b>Methods</b>: Following the Joanna Briggs Institute guideline, we conducted a systematic search of four databases (two English and two Korean) from inception to November 2023. Studies describing ultrasound-guided injection procedures with skin disinfection protocols were included. The extracted procedures were categorized and analyzed according to their timing (before, during, and after injection) and purpose. <b>Results</b>: Among 1728 studies identified, 86 met inclusion criteria. Notable variations were found in infection prevention practices, with only 5.81% reporting probe disinfection procedures and 27.91% documenting sterile probe cover use. Skin disinfection methods also varied, with iodophors (20.93%) and alcohol-based solutions (11.63%) being most common. Of studies describing ultrasound coupling agent procedures (26.74%), less than 20% specifically mentioned using sterile transmission agents. Documentation of temporal aspects of infection prevention was limited, with most studies not addressing precise timing of disinfection procedures or post-procedure probe reprocessing protocols. <b>Conclusions</b>: Our findings reveal considerable variation in infection prevention practices during ultrasound-guided injections and highlight gaps in documentation of hygiene protocols. These findings suggest the need for standardized, evidence-based protocols tailored to different anatomical sites and types of injections. Further research through expert consensus and real-world implementation is needed to develop and validate comprehensive guidelines for clinical practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12977,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Healthcare\",\"volume\":\"13 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Healthcare\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13101165\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13101165","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
A Scoping Review of Clinical Studies on Procedures of Ultrasound-Guided Injection to Ensure Hygiene and Safety.
Background: Ultrasound guidance is widely used to enhance injection accuracy and safety. However, ultrasound-guided procedures require complex manipulation of both probe and needle. This simultaneous manipulation while maintaining sterility necessitates specific infection prevention protocols. This scoping review aimed to systematically investigate hygiene and safety procedures reported in clinical studies of ultrasound-guided injections. Methods: Following the Joanna Briggs Institute guideline, we conducted a systematic search of four databases (two English and two Korean) from inception to November 2023. Studies describing ultrasound-guided injection procedures with skin disinfection protocols were included. The extracted procedures were categorized and analyzed according to their timing (before, during, and after injection) and purpose. Results: Among 1728 studies identified, 86 met inclusion criteria. Notable variations were found in infection prevention practices, with only 5.81% reporting probe disinfection procedures and 27.91% documenting sterile probe cover use. Skin disinfection methods also varied, with iodophors (20.93%) and alcohol-based solutions (11.63%) being most common. Of studies describing ultrasound coupling agent procedures (26.74%), less than 20% specifically mentioned using sterile transmission agents. Documentation of temporal aspects of infection prevention was limited, with most studies not addressing precise timing of disinfection procedures or post-procedure probe reprocessing protocols. Conclusions: Our findings reveal considerable variation in infection prevention practices during ultrasound-guided injections and highlight gaps in documentation of hygiene protocols. These findings suggest the need for standardized, evidence-based protocols tailored to different anatomical sites and types of injections. Further research through expert consensus and real-world implementation is needed to develop and validate comprehensive guidelines for clinical practice.
期刊介绍:
Healthcare (ISSN 2227-9032) is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal (free for readers), which publishes original theoretical and empirical work in the interdisciplinary area of all aspects of medicine and health care research. Healthcare publishes Original Research Articles, Reviews, Case Reports, Research Notes and Short Communications. We encourage researchers to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. For theoretical papers, full details of proofs must be provided so that the results can be checked; for experimental papers, full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Additionally, electronic files or software regarding the full details of the calculations, experimental procedure, etc., can be deposited along with the publication as “Supplementary Material”.