启用跨多个私有数据集的运行状况数据分析,而无需使用安全多方计算共享信息。

IF 4.1 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Steven Kerr, Chris Robertson, Cathie Sudlow, Aziz Sheikh
{"title":"启用跨多个私有数据集的运行状况数据分析,而无需使用安全多方计算共享信息。","authors":"Steven Kerr, Chris Robertson, Cathie Sudlow, Aziz Sheikh","doi":"10.1136/bmjhci-2024-101384","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The UK's health datasets are among the most comprehensive and inclusive globally, enabling groundbreaking research during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, restrictions on data sharing between secure data environments (SDEs) imposed limitations on the ability to carry out joint analyses across multiple separate datasets. There are currently significant efforts underway to enable such analyses using methods such as federated analytics (FA) and virtual SDEs. FA involves distributed data analysis without sharing raw data but does require sharing summary statistics. Virtual SDEs in principle allow researchers to access data across multiple SDEs, but in practice, data transfers may be restricted by information governance concerns.Secure multiparty computation (SMPC) is a cryptographic approach that allows multiple parties to perform joint analyses over private datasets with zero information sharing. SMPC may eliminate the need for data-sharing agreements and statistical disclosure control, offering a compelling alternative to FA and virtual SDEs. SMPC comes with a higher computational burden than traditional pooled analysis. However, efficient implementations of SMPC can enable a wide range of practical, secure analyses to be carried out.This perspective reviews the strengths and limitations of FA, virtual SDEs and SMPC as approaches to joint analyses across SDEs. We argue that while efforts to implement FA and virtual SDEs are ongoing in the UK, SMPC remains underexplored. Given its unique advantages, we propose that SMPC deserves greater attention as a transformative solution for enabling secure, cross-SDE analyses of private health data.</p>","PeriodicalId":9050,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Health & Care Informatics","volume":"32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enabling health data analyses across multiple private datasets with no information sharing using secure multiparty computation.\",\"authors\":\"Steven Kerr, Chris Robertson, Cathie Sudlow, Aziz Sheikh\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjhci-2024-101384\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The UK's health datasets are among the most comprehensive and inclusive globally, enabling groundbreaking research during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, restrictions on data sharing between secure data environments (SDEs) imposed limitations on the ability to carry out joint analyses across multiple separate datasets. There are currently significant efforts underway to enable such analyses using methods such as federated analytics (FA) and virtual SDEs. FA involves distributed data analysis without sharing raw data but does require sharing summary statistics. Virtual SDEs in principle allow researchers to access data across multiple SDEs, but in practice, data transfers may be restricted by information governance concerns.Secure multiparty computation (SMPC) is a cryptographic approach that allows multiple parties to perform joint analyses over private datasets with zero information sharing. SMPC may eliminate the need for data-sharing agreements and statistical disclosure control, offering a compelling alternative to FA and virtual SDEs. SMPC comes with a higher computational burden than traditional pooled analysis. However, efficient implementations of SMPC can enable a wide range of practical, secure analyses to be carried out.This perspective reviews the strengths and limitations of FA, virtual SDEs and SMPC as approaches to joint analyses across SDEs. We argue that while efforts to implement FA and virtual SDEs are ongoing in the UK, SMPC remains underexplored. Given its unique advantages, we propose that SMPC deserves greater attention as a transformative solution for enabling secure, cross-SDE analyses of private health data.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9050,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Health & Care Informatics\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Health & Care Informatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjhci-2024-101384\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Health & Care Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjhci-2024-101384","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

英国的卫生数据集是全球最全面、最具包容性的数据集之一,有助于在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间开展突破性研究。但是,安全数据环境(sde)之间数据共享的限制限制了跨多个独立数据集执行联合分析的能力。目前正在进行大量工作,以使用联邦分析(FA)和虚拟sde等方法支持此类分析。FA涉及分布式数据分析,但不共享原始数据,但需要共享汇总统计数据。原则上,虚拟sde允许研究人员跨多个sde访问数据,但在实践中,数据传输可能受到信息治理问题的限制。安全多方计算(SMPC)是一种允许多方在零信息共享的情况下对私有数据集进行联合分析的加密方法。SMPC可以消除对数据共享协议和统计披露控制的需求,为FA和虚拟sde提供了一个令人信服的替代方案。与传统的池化分析相比,SMPC具有更高的计算负担。然而,SMPC的有效实现可以实现广泛的实用,安全的分析。这一观点回顾了FA、虚拟SDEs和SMPC作为跨SDEs联合分析方法的优势和局限性。我们认为,虽然英国正在努力实施FA和虚拟sde,但SMPC仍未得到充分探索。鉴于其独特的优势,我们建议SMPC作为一种变革性解决方案值得更多关注,以实现对私人健康数据的安全、跨sde分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Enabling health data analyses across multiple private datasets with no information sharing using secure multiparty computation.

The UK's health datasets are among the most comprehensive and inclusive globally, enabling groundbreaking research during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, restrictions on data sharing between secure data environments (SDEs) imposed limitations on the ability to carry out joint analyses across multiple separate datasets. There are currently significant efforts underway to enable such analyses using methods such as federated analytics (FA) and virtual SDEs. FA involves distributed data analysis without sharing raw data but does require sharing summary statistics. Virtual SDEs in principle allow researchers to access data across multiple SDEs, but in practice, data transfers may be restricted by information governance concerns.Secure multiparty computation (SMPC) is a cryptographic approach that allows multiple parties to perform joint analyses over private datasets with zero information sharing. SMPC may eliminate the need for data-sharing agreements and statistical disclosure control, offering a compelling alternative to FA and virtual SDEs. SMPC comes with a higher computational burden than traditional pooled analysis. However, efficient implementations of SMPC can enable a wide range of practical, secure analyses to be carried out.This perspective reviews the strengths and limitations of FA, virtual SDEs and SMPC as approaches to joint analyses across SDEs. We argue that while efforts to implement FA and virtual SDEs are ongoing in the UK, SMPC remains underexplored. Given its unique advantages, we propose that SMPC deserves greater attention as a transformative solution for enabling secure, cross-SDE analyses of private health data.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
4.90%
发文量
40
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信