数字形态测量说明了乳腺针芯活检中导管原位癌的百分比与乳房肿瘤切除术时的边缘状态之间的关系

Q2 Medicine
Alexander R. Gross , Gerald R. Hobbs Jr. , Luis Samayoa , Stell Santiago
{"title":"数字形态测量说明了乳腺针芯活检中导管原位癌的百分比与乳房肿瘤切除术时的边缘状态之间的关系","authors":"Alexander R. Gross ,&nbsp;Gerald R. Hobbs Jr. ,&nbsp;Luis Samayoa ,&nbsp;Stell Santiago","doi":"10.1016/j.jpi.2025.100445","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Candidates for breast conserving surgery are selected based on imprecise variables and there is uncertainty surrounding the risk of complicated margins. Earlier estimates made with light microscopy revealed the correlation between percentage of needle core biopsy ductal carcinoma in-situ and positive lumpectomy margin status. We now study this association utilizing the precision of digital pathology. One hundred and seventy-nine lumpectomy specimens of pure ductal neoplasia were identified and their pathological, clinical, and radiological parameters retrieved. Each lumpectomy had a corresponding needle core biopsy for histological review. Virtually all cases exhibited a luminal A phenotype. Eighty-three cases showed positive margins and ninety-six cases, negative margins. We used the 2019 American College of Breast Surgeons Lumpectomy Consensus Guidelines to define margin status. For each case, by analog microscopy, we selected a single needle core biopsy slide with the greatest absolute quantity of carcinoma in-situ; each selected slide was submitted for digital whole slide imaging. Digital images were manually annotated for carcinoma in-situ, invasive carcinoma, stroma, and fat strictly based on morphology. Morphometric variables were compiled and compared to the corresponding lumpectomy margin status. Increases in percent ductal carcinoma in-situ are associated with greater odds of positive lumpectomy margins (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05). Above 10% carcinoma in-situ all but one case showed positive margins. This prediction was more precise compared to the association between pre-operative radiological studies and margin status, particularly in cases of pure ductal carcinoma in-situ. Our work suggests that needle core biopsy percentage of ductal carcinoma in-situ maybe clinically useful in assessing the risk of a positive lumpectomy margin in select patients. A larger, multi-institutional study can further elucidate if pathological reporting of needle core biopsies with pure ductal breast neoplasia should include a percentage needle core biopsy ductal carcinoma in-situ.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":37769,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pathology Informatics","volume":"18 ","pages":"Article 100445"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Digital morphometry illustrates a relationship between percentage of ductal carcinoma in-situ in breast needle core biopsy and margin status at lumpectomy\",\"authors\":\"Alexander R. Gross ,&nbsp;Gerald R. Hobbs Jr. ,&nbsp;Luis Samayoa ,&nbsp;Stell Santiago\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jpi.2025.100445\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Candidates for breast conserving surgery are selected based on imprecise variables and there is uncertainty surrounding the risk of complicated margins. Earlier estimates made with light microscopy revealed the correlation between percentage of needle core biopsy ductal carcinoma in-situ and positive lumpectomy margin status. We now study this association utilizing the precision of digital pathology. One hundred and seventy-nine lumpectomy specimens of pure ductal neoplasia were identified and their pathological, clinical, and radiological parameters retrieved. Each lumpectomy had a corresponding needle core biopsy for histological review. Virtually all cases exhibited a luminal A phenotype. Eighty-three cases showed positive margins and ninety-six cases, negative margins. We used the 2019 American College of Breast Surgeons Lumpectomy Consensus Guidelines to define margin status. For each case, by analog microscopy, we selected a single needle core biopsy slide with the greatest absolute quantity of carcinoma in-situ; each selected slide was submitted for digital whole slide imaging. Digital images were manually annotated for carcinoma in-situ, invasive carcinoma, stroma, and fat strictly based on morphology. Morphometric variables were compiled and compared to the corresponding lumpectomy margin status. Increases in percent ductal carcinoma in-situ are associated with greater odds of positive lumpectomy margins (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05). Above 10% carcinoma in-situ all but one case showed positive margins. This prediction was more precise compared to the association between pre-operative radiological studies and margin status, particularly in cases of pure ductal carcinoma in-situ. Our work suggests that needle core biopsy percentage of ductal carcinoma in-situ maybe clinically useful in assessing the risk of a positive lumpectomy margin in select patients. A larger, multi-institutional study can further elucidate if pathological reporting of needle core biopsies with pure ductal breast neoplasia should include a percentage needle core biopsy ductal carcinoma in-situ.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37769,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pathology Informatics\",\"volume\":\"18 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100445\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pathology Informatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2153353925000306\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pathology Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2153353925000306","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

保乳手术的选择是基于不精确的变量和围绕复杂边缘风险的不确定性。早期的光学显微镜估计揭示了针芯活检导管原位癌的百分比与乳房肿瘤切除术边缘状态的阳性之间的相关性。我们现在利用数字病理学的精确性来研究这种联系。我们鉴定了179例纯乳腺导管肿瘤切除术标本,并检索了其病理、临床和放射学参数。每个乳房肿瘤切除术都有相应的针芯活检进行组织学检查。几乎所有病例都表现为腔内a型。边缘阳性83例,边缘阴性96例。我们使用2019年美国乳房外科学会肿瘤切除术共识指南来定义切缘状态。对于每个病例,通过模拟显微镜,我们选择了具有最大原位癌绝对数量的单针核心活检切片;每张选定的幻灯片提交数字全片成像。对原位癌、浸润癌、间质癌、脂肪癌等数字图像严格按照形态学进行人工标注。形态学变量被编译并与相应的乳房肿瘤切除边缘状态进行比较。原位导管癌百分比的增加与乳房肿瘤切除术边缘阳性的几率增加相关(P <; 0.05)。10%以上的原位癌除1例外均为边缘阳性。这一预测比术前放射学研究和切缘状态之间的关系更为精确,特别是在单纯原位导管癌的情况下。我们的研究表明,导管原位癌的针芯活检百分比在临床上可能有助于评估选定患者的乳房肿瘤切除术边缘阳性的风险。一项更大的、多机构的研究可以进一步阐明,单纯导管性乳腺肿瘤的针芯活检病理报告是否应包括原位导管癌的百分比。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Digital morphometry illustrates a relationship between percentage of ductal carcinoma in-situ in breast needle core biopsy and margin status at lumpectomy
Candidates for breast conserving surgery are selected based on imprecise variables and there is uncertainty surrounding the risk of complicated margins. Earlier estimates made with light microscopy revealed the correlation between percentage of needle core biopsy ductal carcinoma in-situ and positive lumpectomy margin status. We now study this association utilizing the precision of digital pathology. One hundred and seventy-nine lumpectomy specimens of pure ductal neoplasia were identified and their pathological, clinical, and radiological parameters retrieved. Each lumpectomy had a corresponding needle core biopsy for histological review. Virtually all cases exhibited a luminal A phenotype. Eighty-three cases showed positive margins and ninety-six cases, negative margins. We used the 2019 American College of Breast Surgeons Lumpectomy Consensus Guidelines to define margin status. For each case, by analog microscopy, we selected a single needle core biopsy slide with the greatest absolute quantity of carcinoma in-situ; each selected slide was submitted for digital whole slide imaging. Digital images were manually annotated for carcinoma in-situ, invasive carcinoma, stroma, and fat strictly based on morphology. Morphometric variables were compiled and compared to the corresponding lumpectomy margin status. Increases in percent ductal carcinoma in-situ are associated with greater odds of positive lumpectomy margins (P < 0.05). Above 10% carcinoma in-situ all but one case showed positive margins. This prediction was more precise compared to the association between pre-operative radiological studies and margin status, particularly in cases of pure ductal carcinoma in-situ. Our work suggests that needle core biopsy percentage of ductal carcinoma in-situ maybe clinically useful in assessing the risk of a positive lumpectomy margin in select patients. A larger, multi-institutional study can further elucidate if pathological reporting of needle core biopsies with pure ductal breast neoplasia should include a percentage needle core biopsy ductal carcinoma in-situ.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Pathology Informatics
Journal of Pathology Informatics Medicine-Pathology and Forensic Medicine
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pathology Informatics (JPI) is an open access peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the advancement of pathology informatics. This is the official journal of the Association for Pathology Informatics (API). The journal aims to publish broadly about pathology informatics and freely disseminate all articles worldwide. This journal is of interest to pathologists, informaticians, academics, researchers, health IT specialists, information officers, IT staff, vendors, and anyone with an interest in informatics. We encourage submissions from anyone with an interest in the field of pathology informatics. We publish all types of papers related to pathology informatics including original research articles, technical notes, reviews, viewpoints, commentaries, editorials, symposia, meeting abstracts, book reviews, and correspondence to the editors. All submissions are subject to rigorous peer review by the well-regarded editorial board and by expert referees in appropriate specialties.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信