{"title":"终末期肾病患者腹膜透析和血液透析的长期结果分析:真实世界数据分析","authors":"Yi-Hsien Chen, Yun-Yi Chen, Yu-Wei Fang, Hung-Hsiang Liou, Jing-Tong Wang, Ming-Hsien Tsai","doi":"10.1111/hdi.13267","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite extensive research on peritoneal dialysis (PD) and hemodialysis (HD), understanding long-term outcomes between these modalities remains limited. We conducted a retrospective cohort study to assess the clinical outcomes of PD and HD in a real-world context.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Utilizing the National Health Insurance Research Database in Taiwan, we studied patients who underwent dialysis from January 2006 to December 2017. Patients with a history of cancer, renal transplantation, age < 20 or > 84 years, or patients on PD who switched to HD within 3 months of starting the modality were excluded. They were categorized into three groups: HD-only (n = 59,751), PD-only (n = 3969), and PD-to-HD transition (n = 3196). Propensity score matching based on sex, age, and the Charlson comorbidity index was used to create comparable groups. Hazard ratios (HR) for clinical outcomes were calculated using the Cox regression model, comparing HD-only versus PD-only and the transition group outcomes. Follow-up continued until December 31, 2020. Finally, external validation was performed using the global TriNetX dataset.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After 1:1 propensity score matching and multivariable adjustment, the HD-only group (n = 3969) exhibited significantly lower all-cause mortality and infection-related admissions compared to the PD-only group (n = 3969) (HRs 0.77 and 0.75, 95% CI: 0.72-0.83 and 0.70-0.80, respectively), with a survival advantage across most subgroups. Conversely, the PD-to-HD transition group (n = 2014) had worse hospitalization and major adverse cardiovascular event outcomes than those on PD-only (n = 2014) (HRs 1.83 and 1.22, 95% CIs: 1.71-1.97 and 1.10-1.36, respectively) but showed neutral mortality rates. A survival benefit emerged 2 years post-transition from PD to HD, with an HR of 0.62 (95% CI: 0.54-0.74). These findings were corroborated by the TriNetX data.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study indicates that HD patients tend to have better clinical outcomes, including greater longevity, compared to PD patients. Thus, the choice of dialysis modality should be tailored to individual patient needs for optimal outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":94027,"journal":{"name":"Hemodialysis international. International Symposium on Home Hemodialysis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Long-Term Outcome Analysis of Peritoneal Dialysis and Hemodialysis in Patients With End-Stage Kidney Disease: A Real-World Data Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Yi-Hsien Chen, Yun-Yi Chen, Yu-Wei Fang, Hung-Hsiang Liou, Jing-Tong Wang, Ming-Hsien Tsai\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/hdi.13267\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite extensive research on peritoneal dialysis (PD) and hemodialysis (HD), understanding long-term outcomes between these modalities remains limited. We conducted a retrospective cohort study to assess the clinical outcomes of PD and HD in a real-world context.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Utilizing the National Health Insurance Research Database in Taiwan, we studied patients who underwent dialysis from January 2006 to December 2017. Patients with a history of cancer, renal transplantation, age < 20 or > 84 years, or patients on PD who switched to HD within 3 months of starting the modality were excluded. They were categorized into three groups: HD-only (n = 59,751), PD-only (n = 3969), and PD-to-HD transition (n = 3196). Propensity score matching based on sex, age, and the Charlson comorbidity index was used to create comparable groups. Hazard ratios (HR) for clinical outcomes were calculated using the Cox regression model, comparing HD-only versus PD-only and the transition group outcomes. Follow-up continued until December 31, 2020. Finally, external validation was performed using the global TriNetX dataset.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After 1:1 propensity score matching and multivariable adjustment, the HD-only group (n = 3969) exhibited significantly lower all-cause mortality and infection-related admissions compared to the PD-only group (n = 3969) (HRs 0.77 and 0.75, 95% CI: 0.72-0.83 and 0.70-0.80, respectively), with a survival advantage across most subgroups. Conversely, the PD-to-HD transition group (n = 2014) had worse hospitalization and major adverse cardiovascular event outcomes than those on PD-only (n = 2014) (HRs 1.83 and 1.22, 95% CIs: 1.71-1.97 and 1.10-1.36, respectively) but showed neutral mortality rates. A survival benefit emerged 2 years post-transition from PD to HD, with an HR of 0.62 (95% CI: 0.54-0.74). These findings were corroborated by the TriNetX data.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study indicates that HD patients tend to have better clinical outcomes, including greater longevity, compared to PD patients. Thus, the choice of dialysis modality should be tailored to individual patient needs for optimal outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94027,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hemodialysis international. International Symposium on Home Hemodialysis\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hemodialysis international. International Symposium on Home Hemodialysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/hdi.13267\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hemodialysis international. International Symposium on Home Hemodialysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/hdi.13267","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Long-Term Outcome Analysis of Peritoneal Dialysis and Hemodialysis in Patients With End-Stage Kidney Disease: A Real-World Data Analysis.
Background: Despite extensive research on peritoneal dialysis (PD) and hemodialysis (HD), understanding long-term outcomes between these modalities remains limited. We conducted a retrospective cohort study to assess the clinical outcomes of PD and HD in a real-world context.
Methods: Utilizing the National Health Insurance Research Database in Taiwan, we studied patients who underwent dialysis from January 2006 to December 2017. Patients with a history of cancer, renal transplantation, age < 20 or > 84 years, or patients on PD who switched to HD within 3 months of starting the modality were excluded. They were categorized into three groups: HD-only (n = 59,751), PD-only (n = 3969), and PD-to-HD transition (n = 3196). Propensity score matching based on sex, age, and the Charlson comorbidity index was used to create comparable groups. Hazard ratios (HR) for clinical outcomes were calculated using the Cox regression model, comparing HD-only versus PD-only and the transition group outcomes. Follow-up continued until December 31, 2020. Finally, external validation was performed using the global TriNetX dataset.
Results: After 1:1 propensity score matching and multivariable adjustment, the HD-only group (n = 3969) exhibited significantly lower all-cause mortality and infection-related admissions compared to the PD-only group (n = 3969) (HRs 0.77 and 0.75, 95% CI: 0.72-0.83 and 0.70-0.80, respectively), with a survival advantage across most subgroups. Conversely, the PD-to-HD transition group (n = 2014) had worse hospitalization and major adverse cardiovascular event outcomes than those on PD-only (n = 2014) (HRs 1.83 and 1.22, 95% CIs: 1.71-1.97 and 1.10-1.36, respectively) but showed neutral mortality rates. A survival benefit emerged 2 years post-transition from PD to HD, with an HR of 0.62 (95% CI: 0.54-0.74). These findings were corroborated by the TriNetX data.
Conclusion: Our study indicates that HD patients tend to have better clinical outcomes, including greater longevity, compared to PD patients. Thus, the choice of dialysis modality should be tailored to individual patient needs for optimal outcomes.