受访专家对人工智能在医学领域的合成数据和ELSI清单的热情有所减弱。

AI and ethics Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-10 DOI:10.1007/s43681-024-00652-x
Laura Y Cabrera, Jennifer Wagner, Sara Gerke, Daniel Susser
{"title":"受访专家对人工智能在医学领域的合成数据和ELSI清单的热情有所减弱。","authors":"Laura Y Cabrera, Jennifer Wagner, Sara Gerke, Daniel Susser","doi":"10.1007/s43681-024-00652-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Synthetic data are increasingly being used in data-driven fields. While synthetic data is a promising tool in medicine, it raises new ethical, legal, and social implications (ELSI) challenges. There is a recognized need for well-designed approaches and standards for documenting and communicating relevant information about artificial intelligence (AI) research datasets and models, including consideration of the many ELSI challenges. This study investigates the ethical dimensions of synthetic data and explores the utility and challenges of ELSI-focused computational checklists for biomedical AI via semi-structure interviews with subject matter experts. Our results suggest that AI experts have tempered views about the promises and challenges of both synthetic data and ELSI-focused computational checklists. Experts discussed a number of ELSI issues covered by previous literature on the topic, such as issues of bias and privacy, yet other less discussed ELSI issues, such as social justice implications and issues of trust were also raised. When discussing ELSI-focused computational checklists our participants highlighted the challenges connected to developing and implementing them.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s43681-024-00652-x.</p>","PeriodicalId":72137,"journal":{"name":"AI and ethics","volume":"5 3","pages":"3241-3254"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12103352/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tempered enthusiasm by interviewed experts for synthetic data and ELSI checklists for AI in medicine.\",\"authors\":\"Laura Y Cabrera, Jennifer Wagner, Sara Gerke, Daniel Susser\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s43681-024-00652-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Synthetic data are increasingly being used in data-driven fields. While synthetic data is a promising tool in medicine, it raises new ethical, legal, and social implications (ELSI) challenges. There is a recognized need for well-designed approaches and standards for documenting and communicating relevant information about artificial intelligence (AI) research datasets and models, including consideration of the many ELSI challenges. This study investigates the ethical dimensions of synthetic data and explores the utility and challenges of ELSI-focused computational checklists for biomedical AI via semi-structure interviews with subject matter experts. Our results suggest that AI experts have tempered views about the promises and challenges of both synthetic data and ELSI-focused computational checklists. Experts discussed a number of ELSI issues covered by previous literature on the topic, such as issues of bias and privacy, yet other less discussed ELSI issues, such as social justice implications and issues of trust were also raised. When discussing ELSI-focused computational checklists our participants highlighted the challenges connected to developing and implementing them.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s43681-024-00652-x.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72137,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AI and ethics\",\"volume\":\"5 3\",\"pages\":\"3241-3254\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12103352/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AI and ethics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-024-00652-x\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/10 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AI and ethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-024-00652-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

合成数据越来越多地应用于数据驱动的领域。虽然合成数据在医学上是一个很有前途的工具,但它提出了新的伦理、法律和社会影响(ELSI)挑战。人们认识到,需要设计良好的方法和标准来记录和交流有关人工智能(AI)研究数据集和模型的相关信息,包括考虑许多ELSI挑战。本研究调查了合成数据的伦理维度,并通过对主题专家的半结构访谈,探讨了以elsi为重点的生物医学人工智能计算清单的效用和挑战。我们的研究结果表明,人工智能专家对合成数据和以elsi为重点的计算清单的前景和挑战的看法有所缓和。专家们讨论了先前关于该主题的文献所涵盖的一些ELSI问题,例如偏见和隐私问题,但也提出了其他较少讨论的ELSI问题,例如社会正义影响和信任问题。在讨论以elsi为中心的计算检查清单时,我们的参与者强调了与开发和实现它们相关的挑战。补充信息:在线版本包含补充资料,提供地址为10.1007/s43681-024-00652-x。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Tempered enthusiasm by interviewed experts for synthetic data and ELSI checklists for AI in medicine.

Synthetic data are increasingly being used in data-driven fields. While synthetic data is a promising tool in medicine, it raises new ethical, legal, and social implications (ELSI) challenges. There is a recognized need for well-designed approaches and standards for documenting and communicating relevant information about artificial intelligence (AI) research datasets and models, including consideration of the many ELSI challenges. This study investigates the ethical dimensions of synthetic data and explores the utility and challenges of ELSI-focused computational checklists for biomedical AI via semi-structure interviews with subject matter experts. Our results suggest that AI experts have tempered views about the promises and challenges of both synthetic data and ELSI-focused computational checklists. Experts discussed a number of ELSI issues covered by previous literature on the topic, such as issues of bias and privacy, yet other less discussed ELSI issues, such as social justice implications and issues of trust were also raised. When discussing ELSI-focused computational checklists our participants highlighted the challenges connected to developing and implementing them.

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s43681-024-00652-x.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信