支持儿科重症监护病房(PICU)入院儿童和家庭心理健康结果的干预措施:范围综述

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Grace Scott, Leigh M Dunn, Belinda Dow, Justin Kenardy, Alexandra C De Young, Debbie A Long
{"title":"支持儿科重症监护病房(PICU)入院儿童和家庭心理健康结果的干预措施:范围综述","authors":"Grace Scott, Leigh M Dunn, Belinda Dow, Justin Kenardy, Alexandra C De Young, Debbie A Long","doi":"10.1111/nicc.70057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Admission to a Paediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) can be a traumatic experience for children and their families. Most children admitted to a PICU will survive; however, a significant proportion of children and their parents will experience serious psychosocial difficulties before, during and after PICU admission. There remains a knowledge gap concerning effective interventions for preventing or reducing adverse psychological outcomes for children and their caregivers.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aimed to identify and describe the types and characteristics of psychosocial interventions for the prevention, early detection and/or treatment of adverse psychological outcomes in children and/or their families before, during and after experiencing PICU admission and to identify gaps in the current literature.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>A scoping review was conducted through PsycINFO, PubMed, CINAHL and Scopus. English-language peer-reviewed and grey literature were searched from the earliest available records to July 2024. Key search domains included interventions and efficacy, feasibility, measurement instruments and psychological outcome variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 3137 studies initially identified through database searching, 10 were included for full review. The findings from included articles describe nine universal interventions that include information provision and psychoeducational approaches, and one targeted psychotherapeutic intervention. There exists a significant paucity of targeted and clinical interventions for those patients and families at high risk of poor psychological outcomes. The Creating Opportunities for Parent Empowerment (COPE) programme emerged as a notable intervention, demonstrating reductions in parental stress, improved emotional coping and increased parental engagement in their child's care.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The existing literature examining the efficacy and effectiveness of psychosocial interventions to prevent or treat poor psychological outcomes before, during and after PICU admission is limited. Although a diverse range of interventions has been explored, notable discrepancies have emerged between these interventions and the actual needs and preferences of children and their families. Challenges related to standardisation and intervention type, setting, timing, scope and target must be carefully addressed in future research.</p><p><strong>Relevance to clinical practice: </strong>This review highlights the need for targeted and clinical evidence-based psychosocial interventions in PICUs to address psychosocial outcomes including posttraumatic stress symptoms (PTSS) and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in children and families. Critical care nurses are uniquely positioned to identify early signs of psychological distress and should advocate for and actively participate in the development and delivery of tailored interventions with families to improve outcomes and recovery.</p>","PeriodicalId":51264,"journal":{"name":"Nursing in Critical Care","volume":"30 3","pages":"e70057"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12107019/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Interventions to Support Psychological Health Outcomes for Children and Families Experiencing Paediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) Admission: A Scoping Review.\",\"authors\":\"Grace Scott, Leigh M Dunn, Belinda Dow, Justin Kenardy, Alexandra C De Young, Debbie A Long\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/nicc.70057\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Admission to a Paediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) can be a traumatic experience for children and their families. Most children admitted to a PICU will survive; however, a significant proportion of children and their parents will experience serious psychosocial difficulties before, during and after PICU admission. There remains a knowledge gap concerning effective interventions for preventing or reducing adverse psychological outcomes for children and their caregivers.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aimed to identify and describe the types and characteristics of psychosocial interventions for the prevention, early detection and/or treatment of adverse psychological outcomes in children and/or their families before, during and after experiencing PICU admission and to identify gaps in the current literature.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>A scoping review was conducted through PsycINFO, PubMed, CINAHL and Scopus. English-language peer-reviewed and grey literature were searched from the earliest available records to July 2024. Key search domains included interventions and efficacy, feasibility, measurement instruments and psychological outcome variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 3137 studies initially identified through database searching, 10 were included for full review. The findings from included articles describe nine universal interventions that include information provision and psychoeducational approaches, and one targeted psychotherapeutic intervention. There exists a significant paucity of targeted and clinical interventions for those patients and families at high risk of poor psychological outcomes. The Creating Opportunities for Parent Empowerment (COPE) programme emerged as a notable intervention, demonstrating reductions in parental stress, improved emotional coping and increased parental engagement in their child's care.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The existing literature examining the efficacy and effectiveness of psychosocial interventions to prevent or treat poor psychological outcomes before, during and after PICU admission is limited. Although a diverse range of interventions has been explored, notable discrepancies have emerged between these interventions and the actual needs and preferences of children and their families. Challenges related to standardisation and intervention type, setting, timing, scope and target must be carefully addressed in future research.</p><p><strong>Relevance to clinical practice: </strong>This review highlights the need for targeted and clinical evidence-based psychosocial interventions in PICUs to address psychosocial outcomes including posttraumatic stress symptoms (PTSS) and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in children and families. Critical care nurses are uniquely positioned to identify early signs of psychological distress and should advocate for and actively participate in the development and delivery of tailored interventions with families to improve outcomes and recovery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51264,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nursing in Critical Care\",\"volume\":\"30 3\",\"pages\":\"e70057\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12107019/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nursing in Critical Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/nicc.70057\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing in Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/nicc.70057","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:入住儿科重症监护病房(PICU)对儿童及其家庭来说可能是一个创伤性的经历。大多数住进PICU的孩子都能活下来;然而,很大一部分儿童及其父母在PICU入院之前、期间和之后都会经历严重的社会心理困难。在预防或减少儿童及其照顾者不良心理后果的有效干预措施方面,仍然存在知识差距。目的:本研究旨在确定和描述儿童和/或其家庭在PICU入院之前、期间和之后的不良心理结果的预防、早期发现和/或治疗的社会心理干预的类型和特征,并确定当前文献中的空白。研究设计:通过PsycINFO、PubMed、CINAHL和Scopus进行范围综述。从最早的可用记录到2024年7月,检索了英语同行评审文献和灰色文献。关键搜索领域包括干预措施和疗效、可行性、测量工具和心理结果变量。结果:在最初通过数据库检索确定的3137项研究中,有10项被纳入完整综述。纳入文章的研究结果描述了九种普遍干预措施,包括信息提供和心理教育方法,以及一种有针对性的心理治疗干预措施。对于那些有不良心理结果高风险的患者和家庭来说,有针对性的临床干预措施明显缺乏。“为父母赋权创造机会”(COPE)项目作为一项显著的干预措施出现,证明了父母压力的减少,情绪应对的改善,以及父母对孩子照顾的参与程度的提高。结论:在PICU入院之前、期间和之后,研究心理社会干预预防或治疗不良心理结局的疗效和有效性的现有文献有限。虽然已经探索了各种各样的干预措施,但这些干预措施与儿童及其家庭的实际需求和偏好之间出现了明显的差异。在未来的研究中,必须认真解决与标准化和干预类型、设置、时间、范围和目标相关的挑战。与临床实践的相关性:本综述强调在picu中需要有针对性和临床证据的社会心理干预,以解决儿童和家庭的心理社会结局,包括创伤后应激症状(PTSS)和创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)。重症监护护士在识别心理困扰的早期迹象方面具有独特的地位,应该倡导并积极参与与家庭一起制定和提供量身定制的干预措施,以改善结果和恢复。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Interventions to Support Psychological Health Outcomes for Children and Families Experiencing Paediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) Admission: A Scoping Review.

Background: Admission to a Paediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) can be a traumatic experience for children and their families. Most children admitted to a PICU will survive; however, a significant proportion of children and their parents will experience serious psychosocial difficulties before, during and after PICU admission. There remains a knowledge gap concerning effective interventions for preventing or reducing adverse psychological outcomes for children and their caregivers.

Aim: This study aimed to identify and describe the types and characteristics of psychosocial interventions for the prevention, early detection and/or treatment of adverse psychological outcomes in children and/or their families before, during and after experiencing PICU admission and to identify gaps in the current literature.

Study design: A scoping review was conducted through PsycINFO, PubMed, CINAHL and Scopus. English-language peer-reviewed and grey literature were searched from the earliest available records to July 2024. Key search domains included interventions and efficacy, feasibility, measurement instruments and psychological outcome variables.

Results: Of 3137 studies initially identified through database searching, 10 were included for full review. The findings from included articles describe nine universal interventions that include information provision and psychoeducational approaches, and one targeted psychotherapeutic intervention. There exists a significant paucity of targeted and clinical interventions for those patients and families at high risk of poor psychological outcomes. The Creating Opportunities for Parent Empowerment (COPE) programme emerged as a notable intervention, demonstrating reductions in parental stress, improved emotional coping and increased parental engagement in their child's care.

Conclusions: The existing literature examining the efficacy and effectiveness of psychosocial interventions to prevent or treat poor psychological outcomes before, during and after PICU admission is limited. Although a diverse range of interventions has been explored, notable discrepancies have emerged between these interventions and the actual needs and preferences of children and their families. Challenges related to standardisation and intervention type, setting, timing, scope and target must be carefully addressed in future research.

Relevance to clinical practice: This review highlights the need for targeted and clinical evidence-based psychosocial interventions in PICUs to address psychosocial outcomes including posttraumatic stress symptoms (PTSS) and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in children and families. Critical care nurses are uniquely positioned to identify early signs of psychological distress and should advocate for and actively participate in the development and delivery of tailored interventions with families to improve outcomes and recovery.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
13.30%
发文量
109
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nursing in Critical Care is an international peer-reviewed journal covering any aspect of critical care nursing practice, research, education or management. Critical care nursing is defined as the whole spectrum of skills, knowledge and attitudes utilised by practitioners in any setting where adults or children, and their families, are experiencing acute and critical illness. Such settings encompass general and specialist hospitals, and the community. Nursing in Critical Care covers the diverse specialities of critical care nursing including surgery, medicine, cardiac, renal, neurosciences, haematology, obstetrics, accident and emergency, neonatal nursing and paediatrics. Papers published in the journal normally fall into one of the following categories: -research reports -literature reviews -developments in practice, education or management -reflections on practice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信