关于CDS故障的特刊:ORCA的开发和评估,一个在EHR停机期间访问订单集的弹性解决方案。

IF 2.1 2区 医学 Q4 MEDICAL INFORMATICS
Stephon N Proctor, Bimal Desai
{"title":"关于CDS故障的特刊:ORCA的开发和评估,一个在EHR停机期间访问订单集的弹性解决方案。","authors":"Stephon N Proctor, Bimal Desai","doi":"10.1055/a-2620-6221","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Clinical decision support systems (CDSS) are central to modern healthcare, but their effectiveness is compromised during system downtimes, which affect 96% of healthcare organizations. During these failures, clinicians lose access to critical decision-making tools like order sets, increasing the risk of medical errors. Traditional downtime solutions, such as paper-based protocols, are often impractical and difficult to maintain.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study introduces and evaluates ORCA (Offsite Repository for Clinical Assets), a resilient web-based solution designed to maintain access to EHR order sets during system failures. We assessed its usability and effectiveness as a downtime decision support tool across various clinical settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>ORCA was developed based on analysis of previous downtime incidents, replicating essential order set functionality while ensuring offsite accessibility. We conducted usability testing with 16 clinicians from diverse specialties, using structured tasks and think-aloud protocols. User feedback was collected through the Usability Metric for User Experience (UMUX) questionnaire and thematic analysis of interview transcripts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ORCA demonstrated strong usability (mean UMUX score: 86.2). Thematic analysis revealed key implementation challenges: system limitations (24.56% of responses), workflow integration (23.39%), and interface navigation (22.22%). Users valued ORCA's familiar interface and offsite accessibility but identified critical gaps in dynamic decision support capabilities.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ORCA represents a viable approach to maintaining basic clinical decision support during downtimes. However, significant challenges remain in replicating dynamic CDS features and ensuring effective integration with existing downtime procedures. These findings inform future development of resilient CDS systems and highlight the importance of planned fallback pathways in clinical systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":48956,"journal":{"name":"Applied Clinical Informatics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Special Issue on CDS Failures: Development and Evaluation of ORCA, a Resilient Solution for Order Set Access During EHR Downtimes.\",\"authors\":\"Stephon N Proctor, Bimal Desai\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2620-6221\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Clinical decision support systems (CDSS) are central to modern healthcare, but their effectiveness is compromised during system downtimes, which affect 96% of healthcare organizations. During these failures, clinicians lose access to critical decision-making tools like order sets, increasing the risk of medical errors. Traditional downtime solutions, such as paper-based protocols, are often impractical and difficult to maintain.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study introduces and evaluates ORCA (Offsite Repository for Clinical Assets), a resilient web-based solution designed to maintain access to EHR order sets during system failures. We assessed its usability and effectiveness as a downtime decision support tool across various clinical settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>ORCA was developed based on analysis of previous downtime incidents, replicating essential order set functionality while ensuring offsite accessibility. We conducted usability testing with 16 clinicians from diverse specialties, using structured tasks and think-aloud protocols. User feedback was collected through the Usability Metric for User Experience (UMUX) questionnaire and thematic analysis of interview transcripts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ORCA demonstrated strong usability (mean UMUX score: 86.2). Thematic analysis revealed key implementation challenges: system limitations (24.56% of responses), workflow integration (23.39%), and interface navigation (22.22%). Users valued ORCA's familiar interface and offsite accessibility but identified critical gaps in dynamic decision support capabilities.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ORCA represents a viable approach to maintaining basic clinical decision support during downtimes. However, significant challenges remain in replicating dynamic CDS features and ensuring effective integration with existing downtime procedures. These findings inform future development of resilient CDS systems and highlight the importance of planned fallback pathways in clinical systems.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48956,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Clinical Informatics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Clinical Informatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2620-6221\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL INFORMATICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Clinical Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2620-6221","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:临床决策支持系统(CDSS)是现代医疗保健的核心,但其有效性在系统停机期间受到损害,这影响了96%的医疗保健组织。在这些故障期间,临床医生无法访问诸如订单集之类的关键决策工具,从而增加了医疗差错的风险。传统的停机解决方案,如基于纸张的协议,通常不切实际且难以维护。目的:本研究介绍并评估了ORCA (Offsite Repository for Clinical Assets),这是一种弹性的基于网络的解决方案,旨在在系统故障期间保持对EHR订单集的访问。我们评估了它在各种临床环境中作为停机决策支持工具的可用性和有效性。方法:ORCA是在分析之前的停机事件的基础上开发的,在确保非现场可访问性的同时,复制了基本的订单集功能。我们对来自不同专业的16名临床医生进行了可用性测试,使用结构化任务和有声思考协议。用户反馈是通过用户体验可用性度量(UMUX)问卷调查和访谈记录的专题分析收集的。结果:ORCA表现出较强的可用性(平均UMUX得分:86.2)。专题分析揭示了主要的实施挑战:系统限制(24.56%)、工作流集成(23.39%)和界面导航(22.22%)。用户重视ORCA熟悉的界面和非现场可访问性,但发现了动态决策支持能力的关键差距。结论:ORCA代表了在停机期间维持基本临床决策支持的可行方法。然而,在复制动态CDS特性和确保与现有停机程序的有效集成方面仍然存在重大挑战。这些发现为弹性CDS系统的未来发展提供了信息,并强调了在临床系统中规划后备途径的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Special Issue on CDS Failures: Development and Evaluation of ORCA, a Resilient Solution for Order Set Access During EHR Downtimes.

Background: Clinical decision support systems (CDSS) are central to modern healthcare, but their effectiveness is compromised during system downtimes, which affect 96% of healthcare organizations. During these failures, clinicians lose access to critical decision-making tools like order sets, increasing the risk of medical errors. Traditional downtime solutions, such as paper-based protocols, are often impractical and difficult to maintain.

Objectives: This study introduces and evaluates ORCA (Offsite Repository for Clinical Assets), a resilient web-based solution designed to maintain access to EHR order sets during system failures. We assessed its usability and effectiveness as a downtime decision support tool across various clinical settings.

Methods: ORCA was developed based on analysis of previous downtime incidents, replicating essential order set functionality while ensuring offsite accessibility. We conducted usability testing with 16 clinicians from diverse specialties, using structured tasks and think-aloud protocols. User feedback was collected through the Usability Metric for User Experience (UMUX) questionnaire and thematic analysis of interview transcripts.

Results: ORCA demonstrated strong usability (mean UMUX score: 86.2). Thematic analysis revealed key implementation challenges: system limitations (24.56% of responses), workflow integration (23.39%), and interface navigation (22.22%). Users valued ORCA's familiar interface and offsite accessibility but identified critical gaps in dynamic decision support capabilities.

Conclusions: ORCA represents a viable approach to maintaining basic clinical decision support during downtimes. However, significant challenges remain in replicating dynamic CDS features and ensuring effective integration with existing downtime procedures. These findings inform future development of resilient CDS systems and highlight the importance of planned fallback pathways in clinical systems.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Clinical Informatics
Applied Clinical Informatics MEDICAL INFORMATICS-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
24.10%
发文量
132
期刊介绍: ACI is the third Schattauer journal dealing with biomedical and health informatics. It perfectly complements our other journals Öffnet internen Link im aktuellen FensterMethods of Information in Medicine and the Öffnet internen Link im aktuellen FensterYearbook of Medical Informatics. The Yearbook of Medical Informatics being the “Milestone” or state-of-the-art journal and Methods of Information in Medicine being the “Science and Research” journal of IMIA, ACI intends to be the “Practical” journal of IMIA.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信