基于随机森林和Logistic回归模型的住院患者意外拔管风险预测。

IF 1.7 3区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Hongyi Mou, Akmal Ergashev, Bingqi Zhou, Na Ye, Xueyan Li
{"title":"基于随机森林和Logistic回归模型的住院患者意外拔管风险预测。","authors":"Hongyi Mou, Akmal Ergashev, Bingqi Zhou, Na Ye, Xueyan Li","doi":"10.1097/PTS.0000000000001365","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Unplanned extubation (UEX) represents a significant risk event in hospitalized patients and is considered one of the most serious safety concerns. Prevention and early detection of these events have become essential components of high-quality nursing care.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare random forest and logistic regression models for the prediction of UEX.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In total, 775 UEX events were selected from the adverse nursing events database of a hospital in Zhejiang Province between January 2021 and December 2022 as the observation group. In addition, 775 planned extubation events were included from the database of hospitalized patients during the same period through 1:1 propensity score matching across various inpatient departments. Subsequently, patients were randomly allocated in a 7:3 ratio to form the development group and the validation group. Both random forest and logistic regression models were constructed. Their performances were compared using metrics including accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In addition, multivariate logistic regression analysis identified individuals aged 65 years and over (OR = 3.34, 95% CI: 2.43-4.59), male (OR = 1.64, 95% CI: 1.18-2.27), impaired awareness (OR = 2.56, 95% CI: 1.44-4.56), concurrent dual catheters (OR = 4.18, 95% CI: 2.77-6.32), presence of 3 or more catheters (OR = 5.55, 95% CI: 3.44-8.97), catheter indwelling time exceeding 1 week but <1 month (OR = 3.32, 95% CI: 2.04-5.41) or more than 1 month (OR = 4.51, 95% CI: 1.55-13.10), and the presence of medium-risk (OR = 0.22, 95% CI: 0.12-0.41) or high-risk catheters (OR = 0.08, 95% CI: 0.04-0.17) with secondary fixation (OR = 0.07, 95% CI: 0.04-0.12) as influential factors for UEX events in inpatients. Several variables, including catheter indwelling time, number of coexisting catheters, age, secondary fixation, and catheter grade, were selected for predicting UEX events using the random forest model. The AUC of the random forest prediction model was 0.812, while the AUC of the logistic regression prediction model was slightly lower at 0.793.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The random forest model outperforms the logistic regression model in predicting inpatient UEX events. However, the logistic regression model remains valuable for its ability to provide intuitive explanations of the results.</p>","PeriodicalId":48901,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Patient Safety","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk Prediction of Unplanned Extubation in Inpatients Using Random Forest and Logistic Regression Models.\",\"authors\":\"Hongyi Mou, Akmal Ergashev, Bingqi Zhou, Na Ye, Xueyan Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/PTS.0000000000001365\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Unplanned extubation (UEX) represents a significant risk event in hospitalized patients and is considered one of the most serious safety concerns. Prevention and early detection of these events have become essential components of high-quality nursing care.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare random forest and logistic regression models for the prediction of UEX.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In total, 775 UEX events were selected from the adverse nursing events database of a hospital in Zhejiang Province between January 2021 and December 2022 as the observation group. In addition, 775 planned extubation events were included from the database of hospitalized patients during the same period through 1:1 propensity score matching across various inpatient departments. Subsequently, patients were randomly allocated in a 7:3 ratio to form the development group and the validation group. Both random forest and logistic regression models were constructed. Their performances were compared using metrics including accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In addition, multivariate logistic regression analysis identified individuals aged 65 years and over (OR = 3.34, 95% CI: 2.43-4.59), male (OR = 1.64, 95% CI: 1.18-2.27), impaired awareness (OR = 2.56, 95% CI: 1.44-4.56), concurrent dual catheters (OR = 4.18, 95% CI: 2.77-6.32), presence of 3 or more catheters (OR = 5.55, 95% CI: 3.44-8.97), catheter indwelling time exceeding 1 week but <1 month (OR = 3.32, 95% CI: 2.04-5.41) or more than 1 month (OR = 4.51, 95% CI: 1.55-13.10), and the presence of medium-risk (OR = 0.22, 95% CI: 0.12-0.41) or high-risk catheters (OR = 0.08, 95% CI: 0.04-0.17) with secondary fixation (OR = 0.07, 95% CI: 0.04-0.12) as influential factors for UEX events in inpatients. Several variables, including catheter indwelling time, number of coexisting catheters, age, secondary fixation, and catheter grade, were selected for predicting UEX events using the random forest model. The AUC of the random forest prediction model was 0.812, while the AUC of the logistic regression prediction model was slightly lower at 0.793.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The random forest model outperforms the logistic regression model in predicting inpatient UEX events. However, the logistic regression model remains valuable for its ability to provide intuitive explanations of the results.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48901,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Patient Safety\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Patient Safety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/PTS.0000000000001365\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Patient Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PTS.0000000000001365","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:意外拔管(UEX)是住院患者的重大风险事件,被认为是最严重的安全问题之一。预防和早期发现这些事件已成为高质量护理的重要组成部分。目的:比较随机森林模型与logistic回归模型对UEX的预测效果。方法:选取浙江省某医院2021年1月至2022年12月不良护理事件数据库中775例UEX事件作为观察组。此外,通过对各住院科室进行1:1倾向评分匹配,从同期住院患者数据库中纳入775例计划拔管事件。随后将患者按7:3的比例随机分配为发展组和验证组。建立了随机森林模型和逻辑回归模型。使用包括准确性、灵敏度、特异性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值和受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)等指标对其性能进行比较。结果:此外,多因素logistic回归分析确定了65岁及以上(OR = 3.34, 95% CI: 2.43 ~ 4.59)、男性(OR = 1.64, 95% CI: 1.18 ~ 2.27)、意识受损(OR = 2.56, 95% CI: 1.44 ~ 4.56)、并发双置管(OR = 4.18, 95% CI: 2.77 ~ 6.32)、置管3根及以上(OR = 5.55, 95% CI: 3.44 ~ 8.97)、置管时间超过1周。随机森林模型在预测住院患者UEX事件方面优于逻辑回归模型。然而,逻辑回归模型仍然有价值,因为它能够提供对结果的直观解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Risk Prediction of Unplanned Extubation in Inpatients Using Random Forest and Logistic Regression Models.

Background: Unplanned extubation (UEX) represents a significant risk event in hospitalized patients and is considered one of the most serious safety concerns. Prevention and early detection of these events have become essential components of high-quality nursing care.

Objective: To compare random forest and logistic regression models for the prediction of UEX.

Methods: In total, 775 UEX events were selected from the adverse nursing events database of a hospital in Zhejiang Province between January 2021 and December 2022 as the observation group. In addition, 775 planned extubation events were included from the database of hospitalized patients during the same period through 1:1 propensity score matching across various inpatient departments. Subsequently, patients were randomly allocated in a 7:3 ratio to form the development group and the validation group. Both random forest and logistic regression models were constructed. Their performances were compared using metrics including accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).

Results: In addition, multivariate logistic regression analysis identified individuals aged 65 years and over (OR = 3.34, 95% CI: 2.43-4.59), male (OR = 1.64, 95% CI: 1.18-2.27), impaired awareness (OR = 2.56, 95% CI: 1.44-4.56), concurrent dual catheters (OR = 4.18, 95% CI: 2.77-6.32), presence of 3 or more catheters (OR = 5.55, 95% CI: 3.44-8.97), catheter indwelling time exceeding 1 week but <1 month (OR = 3.32, 95% CI: 2.04-5.41) or more than 1 month (OR = 4.51, 95% CI: 1.55-13.10), and the presence of medium-risk (OR = 0.22, 95% CI: 0.12-0.41) or high-risk catheters (OR = 0.08, 95% CI: 0.04-0.17) with secondary fixation (OR = 0.07, 95% CI: 0.04-0.12) as influential factors for UEX events in inpatients. Several variables, including catheter indwelling time, number of coexisting catheters, age, secondary fixation, and catheter grade, were selected for predicting UEX events using the random forest model. The AUC of the random forest prediction model was 0.812, while the AUC of the logistic regression prediction model was slightly lower at 0.793.

Conclusion: The random forest model outperforms the logistic regression model in predicting inpatient UEX events. However, the logistic regression model remains valuable for its ability to provide intuitive explanations of the results.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Patient Safety
Journal of Patient Safety HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
13.60%
发文量
302
期刊介绍: Journal of Patient Safety (ISSN 1549-8417; online ISSN 1549-8425) is dedicated to presenting research advances and field applications in every area of patient safety. While Journal of Patient Safety has a research emphasis, it also publishes articles describing near-miss opportunities, system modifications that are barriers to error, and the impact of regulatory changes on healthcare delivery. This mix of research and real-world findings makes Journal of Patient Safety a valuable resource across the breadth of health professions and from bench to bedside.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信