美国腰椎内窥镜脊柱手术后重返工作岗位。

IF 4.9 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Peter B Derman, Micheal Raad, Alexander M Satin, Albert Telfeian, John Ogunlade, Conor Dunn, Osama Kashlan, Sanjay Konakondla, Anubhav G Amin, Meng Huang, Imad Khan, Mark Mahan, Christoph P Hofstetter, Mary P Rogers-LaVanne
{"title":"美国腰椎内窥镜脊柱手术后重返工作岗位。","authors":"Peter B Derman, Micheal Raad, Alexander M Satin, Albert Telfeian, John Ogunlade, Conor Dunn, Osama Kashlan, Sanjay Konakondla, Anubhav G Amin, Meng Huang, Imad Khan, Mark Mahan, Christoph P Hofstetter, Mary P Rogers-LaVanne","doi":"10.1016/j.spinee.2025.05.033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background context: </strong>Return to work (RTW) after spinal surgery is a crucial postoperative outcome influencing patients' lives. Endoscopic spinal surgery (ESS) is an ultra-minimally invasive technique for the treatment of spinal pathology, and some ESS procedures have been shown to improve RTW dynamics following spinal surgery.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of this study is to investigate RTW within ninety days following various lumbar ESS procedures in the United States (US) and compare differences in RTW between patient occupational activity levels and ESS procedural types.</p><p><strong>Study design/setting: </strong>Prospectively collected data provided by patients via the SPINEHealthie mobile health application PATIENT SAMPLE: Patients with a status of employed who received lumbar ESS (n=192) OUTCOME MEASURES: Back pain, leg pain, ODI, and return to work after spine surgery METHODS: The SPINEHealthie project dataset was used for this study. The SPINEHealthie project is a multi-center, multi-surgeon prospectively collected dataset for endoscopic spine surgery in which patients utilize a mobile health application to report critical outcome measures. One hundred ninety-two patients met the inclusion criteria for this study. The primary outcome was patient reported time to RTW. Kaplan Meier survival analysis and Cox proportional hazard models were performed to analyze RTW after lumbar ESS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Average age was 52.0 years, and 59.4% of the sample were male. The cumulative incidence in RTW was 83.6% with a median of patients returning to work at or before 16.0 days after any type of lumbar ESS. Patients with labor-intensive occupations returned to work significantly later than patients with sedentary occupations (p=0.014). Surgical procedure was also associated with RTW (p=0.043); a median of patients returned to work at or before 13.0 days after interlaminar discectomy or unilateral decompression, 20.0 days after far lateral approaches for discectomy or decompression, and 40.0 days after interlaminar unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients who received lumbar ESS return to work relatively rapidly compared to the literature on traditional open lumbar procedures. The type of ESS (as dictated by the underlying pathology), as well as patient occupational physical activity requirements impact postoperative RTW.</p>","PeriodicalId":49484,"journal":{"name":"Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Return to Work After Lumbar Endoscopic Spinal Surgery in the United States.\",\"authors\":\"Peter B Derman, Micheal Raad, Alexander M Satin, Albert Telfeian, John Ogunlade, Conor Dunn, Osama Kashlan, Sanjay Konakondla, Anubhav G Amin, Meng Huang, Imad Khan, Mark Mahan, Christoph P Hofstetter, Mary P Rogers-LaVanne\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.spinee.2025.05.033\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background context: </strong>Return to work (RTW) after spinal surgery is a crucial postoperative outcome influencing patients' lives. Endoscopic spinal surgery (ESS) is an ultra-minimally invasive technique for the treatment of spinal pathology, and some ESS procedures have been shown to improve RTW dynamics following spinal surgery.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of this study is to investigate RTW within ninety days following various lumbar ESS procedures in the United States (US) and compare differences in RTW between patient occupational activity levels and ESS procedural types.</p><p><strong>Study design/setting: </strong>Prospectively collected data provided by patients via the SPINEHealthie mobile health application PATIENT SAMPLE: Patients with a status of employed who received lumbar ESS (n=192) OUTCOME MEASURES: Back pain, leg pain, ODI, and return to work after spine surgery METHODS: The SPINEHealthie project dataset was used for this study. The SPINEHealthie project is a multi-center, multi-surgeon prospectively collected dataset for endoscopic spine surgery in which patients utilize a mobile health application to report critical outcome measures. One hundred ninety-two patients met the inclusion criteria for this study. The primary outcome was patient reported time to RTW. Kaplan Meier survival analysis and Cox proportional hazard models were performed to analyze RTW after lumbar ESS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Average age was 52.0 years, and 59.4% of the sample were male. The cumulative incidence in RTW was 83.6% with a median of patients returning to work at or before 16.0 days after any type of lumbar ESS. Patients with labor-intensive occupations returned to work significantly later than patients with sedentary occupations (p=0.014). Surgical procedure was also associated with RTW (p=0.043); a median of patients returned to work at or before 13.0 days after interlaminar discectomy or unilateral decompression, 20.0 days after far lateral approaches for discectomy or decompression, and 40.0 days after interlaminar unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients who received lumbar ESS return to work relatively rapidly compared to the literature on traditional open lumbar procedures. The type of ESS (as dictated by the underlying pathology), as well as patient occupational physical activity requirements impact postoperative RTW.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49484,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Spine Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Spine Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2025.05.033\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2025.05.033","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景背景:脊柱手术后重返工作岗位(RTW)是影响患者生活的关键术后结果。内窥镜脊柱手术(ESS)是一种治疗脊柱病理的超微创技术,一些ESS手术已被证明可以改善脊柱手术后的RTW动力学。目的:本研究的目的是调查美国各种腰椎ESS手术后90天内的RTW,并比较患者职业活动水平和ESS手术类型之间RTW的差异。研究设计/设置:前瞻性收集患者通过SPINEHealthie移动健康应用程序提供的数据。患者样本:接受腰椎ESS的有工作状态的患者(n=192)。结果测量:背部疼痛、腿部疼痛、ODI和脊柱手术后重返工作岗位。SPINEHealthie项目是一个多中心、多外科医生前瞻性收集的内窥镜脊柱手术数据集,其中患者利用移动健康应用程序报告关键的结果测量。192例患者符合本研究的纳入标准。主要终点是患者报告到RTW的时间。Kaplan Meier生存分析和Cox比例风险模型分析腰椎ESS后的RTW。结果:平均年龄52.0岁,男性占59.4%。RTW的累积发病率为83.6%,患者中位数在任何类型腰椎ESS后16.0天或之前恢复工作。从事劳动密集型职业的患者重返工作岗位的时间明显晚于从事久坐性职业的患者(p=0.014)。手术也与RTW相关(p=0.043);中位患者在椎间椎间盘切除术或单侧减压后13.0天或之前恢复工作,在远侧入路椎间盘切除术或减压后20.0天,在椎间单侧椎板切除术双侧减压后40.0天。结论:与传统腰椎开放手术相比,接受腰椎ESS的患者恢复工作相对较快。ESS类型(由基础病理决定)以及患者职业体力活动要求影响术后RTW。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Return to Work After Lumbar Endoscopic Spinal Surgery in the United States.

Background context: Return to work (RTW) after spinal surgery is a crucial postoperative outcome influencing patients' lives. Endoscopic spinal surgery (ESS) is an ultra-minimally invasive technique for the treatment of spinal pathology, and some ESS procedures have been shown to improve RTW dynamics following spinal surgery.

Purpose: The aim of this study is to investigate RTW within ninety days following various lumbar ESS procedures in the United States (US) and compare differences in RTW between patient occupational activity levels and ESS procedural types.

Study design/setting: Prospectively collected data provided by patients via the SPINEHealthie mobile health application PATIENT SAMPLE: Patients with a status of employed who received lumbar ESS (n=192) OUTCOME MEASURES: Back pain, leg pain, ODI, and return to work after spine surgery METHODS: The SPINEHealthie project dataset was used for this study. The SPINEHealthie project is a multi-center, multi-surgeon prospectively collected dataset for endoscopic spine surgery in which patients utilize a mobile health application to report critical outcome measures. One hundred ninety-two patients met the inclusion criteria for this study. The primary outcome was patient reported time to RTW. Kaplan Meier survival analysis and Cox proportional hazard models were performed to analyze RTW after lumbar ESS.

Results: Average age was 52.0 years, and 59.4% of the sample were male. The cumulative incidence in RTW was 83.6% with a median of patients returning to work at or before 16.0 days after any type of lumbar ESS. Patients with labor-intensive occupations returned to work significantly later than patients with sedentary occupations (p=0.014). Surgical procedure was also associated with RTW (p=0.043); a median of patients returned to work at or before 13.0 days after interlaminar discectomy or unilateral decompression, 20.0 days after far lateral approaches for discectomy or decompression, and 40.0 days after interlaminar unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression.

Conclusions: Patients who received lumbar ESS return to work relatively rapidly compared to the literature on traditional open lumbar procedures. The type of ESS (as dictated by the underlying pathology), as well as patient occupational physical activity requirements impact postoperative RTW.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Spine Journal
Spine Journal 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
680
审稿时长
13.1 weeks
期刊介绍: The Spine Journal, the official journal of the North American Spine Society, is an international and multidisciplinary journal that publishes original, peer-reviewed articles on research and treatment related to the spine and spine care, including basic science and clinical investigations. It is a condition of publication that manuscripts submitted to The Spine Journal have not been published, and will not be simultaneously submitted or published elsewhere. The Spine Journal also publishes major reviews of specific topics by acknowledged authorities, technical notes, teaching editorials, and other special features, Letters to the Editor-in-Chief are encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信