一种用于测量儿童舌力和耐力的新型便携式口面部压力计:基于实验室的有效性研究。

Q2 Medicine
Rizky Kusuma Wardhani, Luh Karunia Wahyuni, Widjajalaksmi Kusumaningsih, Sarworini Bagio Budiardjo, Prasandhya Astagiri Yusuf, Sri Mardjiati Mei Wulan, Aria Kekalih, Titis Prawitasari, Sawitri Darmiati, Boya Nugraha
{"title":"一种用于测量儿童舌力和耐力的新型便携式口面部压力计:基于实验室的有效性研究。","authors":"Rizky Kusuma Wardhani, Luh Karunia Wahyuni, Widjajalaksmi Kusumaningsih, Sarworini Bagio Budiardjo, Prasandhya Astagiri Yusuf, Sri Mardjiati Mei Wulan, Aria Kekalih, Titis Prawitasari, Sawitri Darmiati, Boya Nugraha","doi":"10.2196/68967","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>An accurate tongue strength and endurance assessment is necessary for pediatric dysphagia. TongueFit is a new, portable orofacial manometer for measuring tongue strength and endurance and a game-based training app for children.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to test the validity of TongueFit compared with a standard manometer as the current gold standard for measuring air pressure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This laboratory study compared TongueFit and a standard manometer as the gold standard for measuring air pressure. This study was conducted in 3 different experimental conditions. The first experiment compared TongueFit and the standard manometer using a force tester (MCT-2150), with pressure controlled by MSatLite software. The second and third experiments involved 2-cm and 3-cm bulbs between the 2 devices. This study used Lin concordance correlation to measure the level of agreement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a mean absolute difference of 0.005 kilopascals (kPa) between the TongueFit and the standard manometer (n=35, ρC=1). Statistical analysis showed perfect agreement correlation (ρC=1). By using the 2-cm bulb, TongueFit's mean was 0.007 kPa lower, also showing perfect agreement (ρC=1). Furthermore, using the 3-cm bulb, results showed almost perfect agreement (ρC=0.999) with the TongueFit's mean, which was 0.044 kPa lower.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study confirms the high validity of TongueFit as an orofacial manometer compared with a standard manometer, with negligible mean differences, as well as near-perfect and perfect agreement in the experiments. These results confirm that TongueFit is a valid and accurate tool for assessing tongue strength.</p>","PeriodicalId":36224,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies","volume":"12 ","pages":"e68967"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12129413/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A New, Portable Orofacial Manometer for Measuring Tongue Strength and Endurance in Children: Laboratory-Based Validity Study.\",\"authors\":\"Rizky Kusuma Wardhani, Luh Karunia Wahyuni, Widjajalaksmi Kusumaningsih, Sarworini Bagio Budiardjo, Prasandhya Astagiri Yusuf, Sri Mardjiati Mei Wulan, Aria Kekalih, Titis Prawitasari, Sawitri Darmiati, Boya Nugraha\",\"doi\":\"10.2196/68967\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>An accurate tongue strength and endurance assessment is necessary for pediatric dysphagia. TongueFit is a new, portable orofacial manometer for measuring tongue strength and endurance and a game-based training app for children.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to test the validity of TongueFit compared with a standard manometer as the current gold standard for measuring air pressure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This laboratory study compared TongueFit and a standard manometer as the gold standard for measuring air pressure. This study was conducted in 3 different experimental conditions. The first experiment compared TongueFit and the standard manometer using a force tester (MCT-2150), with pressure controlled by MSatLite software. The second and third experiments involved 2-cm and 3-cm bulbs between the 2 devices. This study used Lin concordance correlation to measure the level of agreement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a mean absolute difference of 0.005 kilopascals (kPa) between the TongueFit and the standard manometer (n=35, ρC=1). Statistical analysis showed perfect agreement correlation (ρC=1). By using the 2-cm bulb, TongueFit's mean was 0.007 kPa lower, also showing perfect agreement (ρC=1). Furthermore, using the 3-cm bulb, results showed almost perfect agreement (ρC=0.999) with the TongueFit's mean, which was 0.044 kPa lower.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study confirms the high validity of TongueFit as an orofacial manometer compared with a standard manometer, with negligible mean differences, as well as near-perfect and perfect agreement in the experiments. These results confirm that TongueFit is a valid and accurate tool for assessing tongue strength.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36224,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies\",\"volume\":\"12 \",\"pages\":\"e68967\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12129413/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2196/68967\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/68967","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:准确的舌力和耐力评估是儿童吞咽困难的必要条件。TongueFit是一款新的便携式口面部压力计,用于测量舌头的力量和耐力,也是一款针对儿童的基于游戏的训练应用程序。目的:本研究的目的是为了检验舌efit与标准压力计作为当前测量气压的金标准的有效性。方法:本实验室将TongueFit与标准压力计作为测量气压的金标准进行了比较。本研究在3种不同的实验条件下进行。第一个实验使用MSatLite软件控制压力,使用力测试仪(MCT-2150)将TongueFit与标准压力计进行比较。第二个和第三个实验在两个装置之间分别放置了2厘米和3厘米的灯泡。本研究采用林氏一致性相关来衡量一致性水平。结果:与标准压力计(n=35, ρC=1)的绝对差值为0.005千帕斯卡(kPa)。统计学分析显示,相关系数完全一致(ρC=1)。使用2 cm的灯泡,TongueFit的平均值降低了0.007 kPa,也显示出完全一致(ρC=1)。此外,使用3 cm的球根,结果与TongueFit的平均值几乎完全一致(ρC=0.999),低0.044 kPa。结论:与标准压力计相比,本研究证实了TongueFit作为口面部压力计的高效度,平均差异可以忽略不计,实验结果接近完美和完美吻合。这些结果证实了TongueFit是一个有效和准确的评估舌头强度的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A New, Portable Orofacial Manometer for Measuring Tongue Strength and Endurance in Children: Laboratory-Based Validity Study.

Background: An accurate tongue strength and endurance assessment is necessary for pediatric dysphagia. TongueFit is a new, portable orofacial manometer for measuring tongue strength and endurance and a game-based training app for children.

Objective: This study aimed to test the validity of TongueFit compared with a standard manometer as the current gold standard for measuring air pressure.

Methods: This laboratory study compared TongueFit and a standard manometer as the gold standard for measuring air pressure. This study was conducted in 3 different experimental conditions. The first experiment compared TongueFit and the standard manometer using a force tester (MCT-2150), with pressure controlled by MSatLite software. The second and third experiments involved 2-cm and 3-cm bulbs between the 2 devices. This study used Lin concordance correlation to measure the level of agreement.

Results: There was a mean absolute difference of 0.005 kilopascals (kPa) between the TongueFit and the standard manometer (n=35, ρC=1). Statistical analysis showed perfect agreement correlation (ρC=1). By using the 2-cm bulb, TongueFit's mean was 0.007 kPa lower, also showing perfect agreement (ρC=1). Furthermore, using the 3-cm bulb, results showed almost perfect agreement (ρC=0.999) with the TongueFit's mean, which was 0.044 kPa lower.

Conclusions: This study confirms the high validity of TongueFit as an orofacial manometer compared with a standard manometer, with negligible mean differences, as well as near-perfect and perfect agreement in the experiments. These results confirm that TongueFit is a valid and accurate tool for assessing tongue strength.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信