一种提议的牙髓炎诊断分类的临床验证。

IF 5.4 1区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
R N Karrar, S G Craig, H F Duncan, S A Abushouk, S Y Elfiel, F T Lundy, M Clarke, I A El-Karim
{"title":"一种提议的牙髓炎诊断分类的临床验证。","authors":"R N Karrar, S G Craig, H F Duncan, S A Abushouk, S Y Elfiel, F T Lundy, M Clarke, I A El-Karim","doi":"10.1111/iej.14254","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Determine the reliability and clinical validity of the Wolters classification of pulpitis.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>Prospective diagnostic accuracy study in which patients with pulpitis were included. Based on history, clinical and radiographic examination, participants were categorized into initial, mild, moderate or severe pulpitis based on Wolters classification and received treatment as suggested in the classification. The American Association of Endodontists (AAE) classification was used for comparison. Treatment outcome was evaluated at 12 months. Classification reliability was assessed by measuring the interrater agreement using Fleiss' Kappa. Construct validity was assessed by cluster analysis using an unsupervised machine learning approach. Predictive validity was determined by the association of treatment outcome with the diagnostic category. All statistical analyses were conducted using R v4.3.1; a p-value of <.05 was considered statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ninety-two patients were included in the study. The interrater reliability showed fair agreement for Wolters classification (Kappa (κ) = 0.593, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.592-0.595), compared with substantial agreement (κ = 0.888, 95% CI: 0.887-0.889) for the AAE classification. Association of Wolters classification with output of unsupervised K-mode cluster analysis showed that the use of a three-category model may improve discrimination of pulpitis subdivided into mild, moderate, and severe categories. The revised classification model demonstrated 100% sensitivity and specificity for accurate discrimination between mild and severe pulpitis and 83% sensitivity and 85.7% specificity for classifying moderate pulpitis. There was no significant difference between these revised diagnostic categories considering treatment outcome, suggesting good predictive validity (p > .05). Compared with the AAE classification, the new classification in conjunction with proposed treatments resulted in preserving 87% of the pulps compared with historical treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We propose that a revised Wolters classification model is suitable for determining mild, moderate, and severe pulpitis to aid in clinical management of pulpitis.</p>","PeriodicalId":13724,"journal":{"name":"International endodontic journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical validation of a proposed diagnostic classification for pulpitis.\",\"authors\":\"R N Karrar, S G Craig, H F Duncan, S A Abushouk, S Y Elfiel, F T Lundy, M Clarke, I A El-Karim\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/iej.14254\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Determine the reliability and clinical validity of the Wolters classification of pulpitis.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>Prospective diagnostic accuracy study in which patients with pulpitis were included. Based on history, clinical and radiographic examination, participants were categorized into initial, mild, moderate or severe pulpitis based on Wolters classification and received treatment as suggested in the classification. The American Association of Endodontists (AAE) classification was used for comparison. Treatment outcome was evaluated at 12 months. Classification reliability was assessed by measuring the interrater agreement using Fleiss' Kappa. Construct validity was assessed by cluster analysis using an unsupervised machine learning approach. Predictive validity was determined by the association of treatment outcome with the diagnostic category. All statistical analyses were conducted using R v4.3.1; a p-value of <.05 was considered statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ninety-two patients were included in the study. The interrater reliability showed fair agreement for Wolters classification (Kappa (κ) = 0.593, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.592-0.595), compared with substantial agreement (κ = 0.888, 95% CI: 0.887-0.889) for the AAE classification. Association of Wolters classification with output of unsupervised K-mode cluster analysis showed that the use of a three-category model may improve discrimination of pulpitis subdivided into mild, moderate, and severe categories. The revised classification model demonstrated 100% sensitivity and specificity for accurate discrimination between mild and severe pulpitis and 83% sensitivity and 85.7% specificity for classifying moderate pulpitis. There was no significant difference between these revised diagnostic categories considering treatment outcome, suggesting good predictive validity (p > .05). Compared with the AAE classification, the new classification in conjunction with proposed treatments resulted in preserving 87% of the pulps compared with historical treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We propose that a revised Wolters classification model is suitable for determining mild, moderate, and severe pulpitis to aid in clinical management of pulpitis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13724,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International endodontic journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International endodontic journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.14254\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International endodontic journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.14254","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:确定沃尔特斯牙髓炎分型的可靠性和临床有效性。方法:前瞻性诊断准确性研究,纳入牙髓炎患者。根据病史、临床和影像学检查,根据Wolters分类法将患者分为原发性、轻度、中度和重度牙髓炎,并根据分类建议进行治疗。采用美国牙髓医师协会(AAE)分类进行比较。12个月时评估治疗结果。分类信度采用Fleiss Kappa法测量译员间的一致性。结构效度通过使用无监督机器学习方法的聚类分析进行评估。预测效度由治疗结果与诊断类别的关联决定。采用R v4.3.1进行统计分析;结果的p值:92例患者纳入研究。与AAE分类的显著一致性(κ = 0.888, 95% CI: 0.887-0.889)相比,Wolters分类的判据信度表现为相当一致(Kappa (κ) = 0.593, 95%可信区间(CI): 0.592-0.595)。将Wolters分类与无监督k模式聚类分析的输出相关联表明,使用三类模型可以提高对细分为轻度、中度和重度牙髓炎的区分。修正后的分类模型对轻度和重度牙髓炎的准确区分具有100%的敏感性和特异性,对中度牙髓炎的分类具有83%的敏感性和85.7%的特异性。考虑到治疗结果,这些修订后的诊断类别之间没有显著差异,提示良好的预测效度(p < 0.05)。与AAE分类相比,新分类与建议的处理相结合,与历史处理相比,保留了87%的纸浆。结论:我们建议修订后的Wolters分类模型适用于确定轻度、中度和重度牙髓炎,以帮助临床管理牙髓炎。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinical validation of a proposed diagnostic classification for pulpitis.

Aim: Determine the reliability and clinical validity of the Wolters classification of pulpitis.

Methodology: Prospective diagnostic accuracy study in which patients with pulpitis were included. Based on history, clinical and radiographic examination, participants were categorized into initial, mild, moderate or severe pulpitis based on Wolters classification and received treatment as suggested in the classification. The American Association of Endodontists (AAE) classification was used for comparison. Treatment outcome was evaluated at 12 months. Classification reliability was assessed by measuring the interrater agreement using Fleiss' Kappa. Construct validity was assessed by cluster analysis using an unsupervised machine learning approach. Predictive validity was determined by the association of treatment outcome with the diagnostic category. All statistical analyses were conducted using R v4.3.1; a p-value of <.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results: Ninety-two patients were included in the study. The interrater reliability showed fair agreement for Wolters classification (Kappa (κ) = 0.593, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.592-0.595), compared with substantial agreement (κ = 0.888, 95% CI: 0.887-0.889) for the AAE classification. Association of Wolters classification with output of unsupervised K-mode cluster analysis showed that the use of a three-category model may improve discrimination of pulpitis subdivided into mild, moderate, and severe categories. The revised classification model demonstrated 100% sensitivity and specificity for accurate discrimination between mild and severe pulpitis and 83% sensitivity and 85.7% specificity for classifying moderate pulpitis. There was no significant difference between these revised diagnostic categories considering treatment outcome, suggesting good predictive validity (p > .05). Compared with the AAE classification, the new classification in conjunction with proposed treatments resulted in preserving 87% of the pulps compared with historical treatment.

Conclusions: We propose that a revised Wolters classification model is suitable for determining mild, moderate, and severe pulpitis to aid in clinical management of pulpitis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International endodontic journal
International endodontic journal 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
28.00%
发文量
195
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Endodontic Journal is published monthly and strives to publish original articles of the highest quality to disseminate scientific and clinical knowledge; all manuscripts are subjected to peer review. Original scientific articles are published in the areas of biomedical science, applied materials science, bioengineering, epidemiology and social science relevant to endodontic disease and its management, and to the restoration of root-treated teeth. In addition, review articles, reports of clinical cases, book reviews, summaries and abstracts of scientific meetings and news items are accepted. The International Endodontic Journal is essential reading for general dental practitioners, specialist endodontists, research, scientists and dental teachers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信