在一次社区活动中使用自动体外除颤器时出现的错误:一篇叙述性文献综述和案例研究。

IF 0.9 Q4 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Critical Care Nursing Quarterly Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-21 DOI:10.1097/CNQ.0000000000000546
Patricia Ann Zrelak
{"title":"在一次社区活动中使用自动体外除颤器时出现的错误:一篇叙述性文献综述和案例研究。","authors":"Patricia Ann Zrelak","doi":"10.1097/CNQ.0000000000000546","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Early basic life support and defibrillation using automated external defibrillators (AEDs) are key for improving survival in those suffering an out-of-hospital sudden cardiac arrest. To improve survival, access to AEDs by lay responders is growing, and use is included in basic cardiac life support training. These devices are considered extremely safe, evidenced by the paucity of medical literature on AED misuse and expert opinion. However, it's crucial to point out that even medical personnel can make errors in their use. This case study of AED misuse during a community event and narrative literature review underscores the potential for errors in using an AED, which could cause considerable patient harm. To prevent errors in AED use, it is important to train on (1) equipment in use or likely to be encountered in the field, (2) how to dump an electric charge, especially when using a fully automated machine, (3) the need to follow specific machine instructions, (4) proper application of the defibrillator pads (including one-piece pads with metronome), (5) the need to assess the patient and not rely entirely on the AED prompts, which can contain false alerts and inappropriate instruction, and (6) the need for closed-loop communication, even when participating in a community event.</p>","PeriodicalId":10789,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care Nursing Quarterly","volume":"48 3","pages":"267-273"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Narrative Literature Review and Case Study Highlighting Errors in Automatic External Defibrillator Use at a Community Event.\",\"authors\":\"Patricia Ann Zrelak\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/CNQ.0000000000000546\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Early basic life support and defibrillation using automated external defibrillators (AEDs) are key for improving survival in those suffering an out-of-hospital sudden cardiac arrest. To improve survival, access to AEDs by lay responders is growing, and use is included in basic cardiac life support training. These devices are considered extremely safe, evidenced by the paucity of medical literature on AED misuse and expert opinion. However, it's crucial to point out that even medical personnel can make errors in their use. This case study of AED misuse during a community event and narrative literature review underscores the potential for errors in using an AED, which could cause considerable patient harm. To prevent errors in AED use, it is important to train on (1) equipment in use or likely to be encountered in the field, (2) how to dump an electric charge, especially when using a fully automated machine, (3) the need to follow specific machine instructions, (4) proper application of the defibrillator pads (including one-piece pads with metronome), (5) the need to assess the patient and not rely entirely on the AED prompts, which can contain false alerts and inappropriate instruction, and (6) the need for closed-loop communication, even when participating in a community event.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10789,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical Care Nursing Quarterly\",\"volume\":\"48 3\",\"pages\":\"267-273\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical Care Nursing Quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/CNQ.0000000000000546\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care Nursing Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CNQ.0000000000000546","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

早期基本生命支持和使用自动体外除颤器(aed)除颤是提高院外心脏骤停患者生存率的关键。为了提高生存率,非专业急救人员使用aed的机会越来越多,并将其纳入基本心脏生命支持训练。这些装置被认为是极其安全的,关于AED误用的医学文献和专家意见的缺乏证明了这一点。然而,重要的是要指出,即使是医务人员也可能在使用它们时犯错误。这个在社区活动中使用AED的案例研究和叙述性文献回顾强调了使用AED错误的可能性,这可能会对患者造成相当大的伤害。防止AED使用中的错误,重要的是训练(1)设备在使用或可能遇到,(2)如何转储一个电荷,特别是当使用一个完全自动化的机器,(3)需要遵循特定的机器指令,(4)适当的除颤器垫的应用(包括整体垫与节拍器),(5)评估病人的需要,而不是完全依赖AED提示,可以包含虚假警报和不适当的指令,(6)需要闭环沟通,即使在参加社区活动时也是如此。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Narrative Literature Review and Case Study Highlighting Errors in Automatic External Defibrillator Use at a Community Event.

Early basic life support and defibrillation using automated external defibrillators (AEDs) are key for improving survival in those suffering an out-of-hospital sudden cardiac arrest. To improve survival, access to AEDs by lay responders is growing, and use is included in basic cardiac life support training. These devices are considered extremely safe, evidenced by the paucity of medical literature on AED misuse and expert opinion. However, it's crucial to point out that even medical personnel can make errors in their use. This case study of AED misuse during a community event and narrative literature review underscores the potential for errors in using an AED, which could cause considerable patient harm. To prevent errors in AED use, it is important to train on (1) equipment in use or likely to be encountered in the field, (2) how to dump an electric charge, especially when using a fully automated machine, (3) the need to follow specific machine instructions, (4) proper application of the defibrillator pads (including one-piece pads with metronome), (5) the need to assess the patient and not rely entirely on the AED prompts, which can contain false alerts and inappropriate instruction, and (6) the need for closed-loop communication, even when participating in a community event.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Critical Care Nursing Quarterly
Critical Care Nursing Quarterly CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
76
期刊介绍: Critical Care Nursing Quarterly (CCNQ) is a peer-reviewed journal that provides current practice-oriented information for the continuing education and improved clinical practice of critical care professionals, including nurses, physicians, and allied health care professionals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信