儿童风湿病远程医疗分诊:一种诊断准确的工具,以改善获得护理。

IF 2.2 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Diagnosis Pub Date : 2025-05-23 DOI:10.1515/dx-2025-0031
Laura Aisenberg, Irit R Rasooly, Pamela F Weiss, Jon Burnham, Anna Costello
{"title":"儿童风湿病远程医疗分诊:一种诊断准确的工具,以改善获得护理。","authors":"Laura Aisenberg, Irit R Rasooly, Pamela F Weiss, Jon Burnham, Anna Costello","doi":"10.1515/dx-2025-0031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>During the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, new patient evaluations in pediatric rheumatology were performed using telehealth. Given the pediatric rheumatology workforce shortage, telehealth may be a way to efficiently triage referrals. The objective was to assess the utility of telehealth visits as a diagnostic tool to accurately assess the need for in-person evaluation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective cohort study of patients evaluated by telehealth for a new patient visit from March 1 to June 30, 2020 at a tertiary center. Electronic health record documentation from subsequent rheumatology, specialty, and primary care encounters over the subsequent 4 years were reviewed. The primary outcome was diagnostic concordance, defined as consistency in the documented diagnostic reasoning, between the initial telehealth video visit and in-person follow-up visits.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the study period, there were 111 telehealth visits, 80 (72 %) of which had follow-up data. 55/80 had in-person rheumatology evaluations. Only 9 % patients had discordant diagnoses, all of whom had initial concern for inflammatory arthritis during the telehealth visit but a diagnosis of a non-inflammatory condition after in-person evaluation. Nine patients with a significant rheumatic disease were identified via telehealth. There were no unplanned ED visits or hospital admissions following telehealth visits. 33 % of patients were found to not warrant rheumatologic follow-up after the telehealth visit.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>For pediatric rheumatology new patient evaluations, diagnostic accuracy via telehealth evaluation was high. Providers triaged patients with chronic rheumatologic conditions for in-person evaluations and were able to accurately identify benign conditions that did not require in-person follow-up.</p>","PeriodicalId":11273,"journal":{"name":"Diagnosis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Telehealth triage in pediatric rheumatology: a diagnostically accurate tool to improve access to care.\",\"authors\":\"Laura Aisenberg, Irit R Rasooly, Pamela F Weiss, Jon Burnham, Anna Costello\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/dx-2025-0031\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>During the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, new patient evaluations in pediatric rheumatology were performed using telehealth. Given the pediatric rheumatology workforce shortage, telehealth may be a way to efficiently triage referrals. The objective was to assess the utility of telehealth visits as a diagnostic tool to accurately assess the need for in-person evaluation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective cohort study of patients evaluated by telehealth for a new patient visit from March 1 to June 30, 2020 at a tertiary center. Electronic health record documentation from subsequent rheumatology, specialty, and primary care encounters over the subsequent 4 years were reviewed. The primary outcome was diagnostic concordance, defined as consistency in the documented diagnostic reasoning, between the initial telehealth video visit and in-person follow-up visits.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the study period, there were 111 telehealth visits, 80 (72 %) of which had follow-up data. 55/80 had in-person rheumatology evaluations. Only 9 % patients had discordant diagnoses, all of whom had initial concern for inflammatory arthritis during the telehealth visit but a diagnosis of a non-inflammatory condition after in-person evaluation. Nine patients with a significant rheumatic disease were identified via telehealth. There were no unplanned ED visits or hospital admissions following telehealth visits. 33 % of patients were found to not warrant rheumatologic follow-up after the telehealth visit.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>For pediatric rheumatology new patient evaluations, diagnostic accuracy via telehealth evaluation was high. Providers triaged patients with chronic rheumatologic conditions for in-person evaluations and were able to accurately identify benign conditions that did not require in-person follow-up.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11273,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diagnosis\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diagnosis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/dx-2025-0031\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnosis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/dx-2025-0031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:在SARS-CoV-2大流行期间,利用远程医疗对儿科风湿病新患者进行评估。鉴于儿科风湿病人力短缺,远程医疗可能是有效分流转诊的一种方式。目的是评估远程保健访问作为一种诊断工具的效用,以准确评估面对面评估的必要性。方法:这是一项回顾性队列研究,对2020年3月1日至6月30日在某三级医疗中心就诊的新患者进行远程医疗评估。回顾了随后4年风湿病学、专科和初级保健接触的电子健康记录文件。主要结果是诊断一致性,定义为记录诊断推理的一致性,在最初的远程医疗视频访问和亲自随访之间。结果:在研究期间,有111次远程医疗就诊,其中80次(72% %)有随访资料。55/80进行了亲自风湿病学评估。只有9 %的患者诊断不一致,所有患者在远程医疗访问期间最初都担心炎症性关节炎,但在亲自评估后诊断为非炎症性疾病。通过远程保健确定了9名患有严重风湿病的患者。没有计划外急诊科就诊或远程医疗就诊后住院。33 %的患者在远程医疗访问后发现不需要风湿病学随访。结论:对于儿童风湿病新患者的评估,通过远程医疗评估诊断准确性高。提供者对慢性风湿病患者进行分诊,进行现场评估,并能够准确识别不需要现场随访的良性疾病。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Telehealth triage in pediatric rheumatology: a diagnostically accurate tool to improve access to care.

Objectives: During the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, new patient evaluations in pediatric rheumatology were performed using telehealth. Given the pediatric rheumatology workforce shortage, telehealth may be a way to efficiently triage referrals. The objective was to assess the utility of telehealth visits as a diagnostic tool to accurately assess the need for in-person evaluation.

Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients evaluated by telehealth for a new patient visit from March 1 to June 30, 2020 at a tertiary center. Electronic health record documentation from subsequent rheumatology, specialty, and primary care encounters over the subsequent 4 years were reviewed. The primary outcome was diagnostic concordance, defined as consistency in the documented diagnostic reasoning, between the initial telehealth video visit and in-person follow-up visits.

Results: During the study period, there were 111 telehealth visits, 80 (72 %) of which had follow-up data. 55/80 had in-person rheumatology evaluations. Only 9 % patients had discordant diagnoses, all of whom had initial concern for inflammatory arthritis during the telehealth visit but a diagnosis of a non-inflammatory condition after in-person evaluation. Nine patients with a significant rheumatic disease were identified via telehealth. There were no unplanned ED visits or hospital admissions following telehealth visits. 33 % of patients were found to not warrant rheumatologic follow-up after the telehealth visit.

Conclusions: For pediatric rheumatology new patient evaluations, diagnostic accuracy via telehealth evaluation was high. Providers triaged patients with chronic rheumatologic conditions for in-person evaluations and were able to accurately identify benign conditions that did not require in-person follow-up.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Diagnosis
Diagnosis MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
5.70%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: Diagnosis focuses on how diagnosis can be advanced, how it is taught, and how and why it can fail, leading to diagnostic errors. The journal welcomes both fundamental and applied works, improvement initiatives, opinions, and debates to encourage new thinking on improving this critical aspect of healthcare quality.  Topics: -Factors that promote diagnostic quality and safety -Clinical reasoning -Diagnostic errors in medicine -The factors that contribute to diagnostic error: human factors, cognitive issues, and system-related breakdowns -Improving the value of diagnosis – eliminating waste and unnecessary testing -How culture and removing blame promote awareness of diagnostic errors -Training and education related to clinical reasoning and diagnostic skills -Advances in laboratory testing and imaging that improve diagnostic capability -Local, national and international initiatives to reduce diagnostic error
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信