Laura Aisenberg, Irit R Rasooly, Pamela F Weiss, Jon Burnham, Anna Costello
{"title":"儿童风湿病远程医疗分诊:一种诊断准确的工具,以改善获得护理。","authors":"Laura Aisenberg, Irit R Rasooly, Pamela F Weiss, Jon Burnham, Anna Costello","doi":"10.1515/dx-2025-0031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>During the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, new patient evaluations in pediatric rheumatology were performed using telehealth. Given the pediatric rheumatology workforce shortage, telehealth may be a way to efficiently triage referrals. The objective was to assess the utility of telehealth visits as a diagnostic tool to accurately assess the need for in-person evaluation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective cohort study of patients evaluated by telehealth for a new patient visit from March 1 to June 30, 2020 at a tertiary center. Electronic health record documentation from subsequent rheumatology, specialty, and primary care encounters over the subsequent 4 years were reviewed. The primary outcome was diagnostic concordance, defined as consistency in the documented diagnostic reasoning, between the initial telehealth video visit and in-person follow-up visits.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the study period, there were 111 telehealth visits, 80 (72 %) of which had follow-up data. 55/80 had in-person rheumatology evaluations. Only 9 % patients had discordant diagnoses, all of whom had initial concern for inflammatory arthritis during the telehealth visit but a diagnosis of a non-inflammatory condition after in-person evaluation. Nine patients with a significant rheumatic disease were identified via telehealth. There were no unplanned ED visits or hospital admissions following telehealth visits. 33 % of patients were found to not warrant rheumatologic follow-up after the telehealth visit.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>For pediatric rheumatology new patient evaluations, diagnostic accuracy via telehealth evaluation was high. Providers triaged patients with chronic rheumatologic conditions for in-person evaluations and were able to accurately identify benign conditions that did not require in-person follow-up.</p>","PeriodicalId":11273,"journal":{"name":"Diagnosis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Telehealth triage in pediatric rheumatology: a diagnostically accurate tool to improve access to care.\",\"authors\":\"Laura Aisenberg, Irit R Rasooly, Pamela F Weiss, Jon Burnham, Anna Costello\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/dx-2025-0031\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>During the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, new patient evaluations in pediatric rheumatology were performed using telehealth. Given the pediatric rheumatology workforce shortage, telehealth may be a way to efficiently triage referrals. The objective was to assess the utility of telehealth visits as a diagnostic tool to accurately assess the need for in-person evaluation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective cohort study of patients evaluated by telehealth for a new patient visit from March 1 to June 30, 2020 at a tertiary center. Electronic health record documentation from subsequent rheumatology, specialty, and primary care encounters over the subsequent 4 years were reviewed. The primary outcome was diagnostic concordance, defined as consistency in the documented diagnostic reasoning, between the initial telehealth video visit and in-person follow-up visits.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the study period, there were 111 telehealth visits, 80 (72 %) of which had follow-up data. 55/80 had in-person rheumatology evaluations. Only 9 % patients had discordant diagnoses, all of whom had initial concern for inflammatory arthritis during the telehealth visit but a diagnosis of a non-inflammatory condition after in-person evaluation. Nine patients with a significant rheumatic disease were identified via telehealth. There were no unplanned ED visits or hospital admissions following telehealth visits. 33 % of patients were found to not warrant rheumatologic follow-up after the telehealth visit.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>For pediatric rheumatology new patient evaluations, diagnostic accuracy via telehealth evaluation was high. Providers triaged patients with chronic rheumatologic conditions for in-person evaluations and were able to accurately identify benign conditions that did not require in-person follow-up.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11273,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diagnosis\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diagnosis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/dx-2025-0031\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnosis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/dx-2025-0031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Telehealth triage in pediatric rheumatology: a diagnostically accurate tool to improve access to care.
Objectives: During the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, new patient evaluations in pediatric rheumatology were performed using telehealth. Given the pediatric rheumatology workforce shortage, telehealth may be a way to efficiently triage referrals. The objective was to assess the utility of telehealth visits as a diagnostic tool to accurately assess the need for in-person evaluation.
Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients evaluated by telehealth for a new patient visit from March 1 to June 30, 2020 at a tertiary center. Electronic health record documentation from subsequent rheumatology, specialty, and primary care encounters over the subsequent 4 years were reviewed. The primary outcome was diagnostic concordance, defined as consistency in the documented diagnostic reasoning, between the initial telehealth video visit and in-person follow-up visits.
Results: During the study period, there were 111 telehealth visits, 80 (72 %) of which had follow-up data. 55/80 had in-person rheumatology evaluations. Only 9 % patients had discordant diagnoses, all of whom had initial concern for inflammatory arthritis during the telehealth visit but a diagnosis of a non-inflammatory condition after in-person evaluation. Nine patients with a significant rheumatic disease were identified via telehealth. There were no unplanned ED visits or hospital admissions following telehealth visits. 33 % of patients were found to not warrant rheumatologic follow-up after the telehealth visit.
Conclusions: For pediatric rheumatology new patient evaluations, diagnostic accuracy via telehealth evaluation was high. Providers triaged patients with chronic rheumatologic conditions for in-person evaluations and were able to accurately identify benign conditions that did not require in-person follow-up.
期刊介绍:
Diagnosis focuses on how diagnosis can be advanced, how it is taught, and how and why it can fail, leading to diagnostic errors. The journal welcomes both fundamental and applied works, improvement initiatives, opinions, and debates to encourage new thinking on improving this critical aspect of healthcare quality. Topics: -Factors that promote diagnostic quality and safety -Clinical reasoning -Diagnostic errors in medicine -The factors that contribute to diagnostic error: human factors, cognitive issues, and system-related breakdowns -Improving the value of diagnosis – eliminating waste and unnecessary testing -How culture and removing blame promote awareness of diagnostic errors -Training and education related to clinical reasoning and diagnostic skills -Advances in laboratory testing and imaging that improve diagnostic capability -Local, national and international initiatives to reduce diagnostic error