整合基础科学和临床技能:临床技能课程中临床病理相关性的线索。

IF 2.2 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Diagnosis Pub Date : 2025-05-23 DOI:10.1515/dx-2023-0173
Ghaith Al-Eyd, Lauren Fine, Yolanda Payne-Jameau
{"title":"整合基础科学和临床技能:临床技能课程中临床病理相关性的线索。","authors":"Ghaith Al-Eyd, Lauren Fine, Yolanda Payne-Jameau","doi":"10.1515/dx-2023-0173","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Understanding the pathologic basis of diseases and their clinical correlates has been growing in parallel to the relevant advances in science and medicine. However, most reformed medical school curricula have mainly addressed the overall content integration with a less emphasis on explicitly structuring the integration of pathophysiology or other relevant basic sciences in clinical skills (CS) courses. Clinicopathologic Correlations (CPCOR), when effectively designed in CS courses, link the clinical findings to their related basic science fundamental changes. Regular highlighting of relevant CPCORs in CS courses enhances student acquisition of clinical reasoning skills and at the same time triggers their translational scientific curiosity. The six-step CPCOR process, detailed in the manuscript, starts with developing session learning objectives that guide CPCOR content development relevant to the weekly CS case. A typical CPCOR session includes pre-encounter and post-encounter small group activities in which students formulate broad and narrow differential diagnosis respectively. Throughout the session, students discuss risk factors, etiopathogenesis, and history and physical examination findings for the identified differential diagnoses. These small group activities are enhanced by a large group session delivered by a Pathologist-Clinician team that leads student centered CPCOR discussions relevant to the weekly CS case. In addition to the enhanced clinical reasoning skills, the implemented CPCOR process augmented the curricular emphasis of lifelong learning skills while reinforcing the importance of the pathologic basis of the clinical findings. Our streamlined CPCOR process can easily be adapted into other medical school curricula to meet relevant needs of integration and clinical reasoning enhancements.</p>","PeriodicalId":11273,"journal":{"name":"Diagnosis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Integrating basic sciences and clinical skills: a thread of Clinicopathological Correlations in a Clinical Skill Course.\",\"authors\":\"Ghaith Al-Eyd, Lauren Fine, Yolanda Payne-Jameau\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/dx-2023-0173\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Understanding the pathologic basis of diseases and their clinical correlates has been growing in parallel to the relevant advances in science and medicine. However, most reformed medical school curricula have mainly addressed the overall content integration with a less emphasis on explicitly structuring the integration of pathophysiology or other relevant basic sciences in clinical skills (CS) courses. Clinicopathologic Correlations (CPCOR), when effectively designed in CS courses, link the clinical findings to their related basic science fundamental changes. Regular highlighting of relevant CPCORs in CS courses enhances student acquisition of clinical reasoning skills and at the same time triggers their translational scientific curiosity. The six-step CPCOR process, detailed in the manuscript, starts with developing session learning objectives that guide CPCOR content development relevant to the weekly CS case. A typical CPCOR session includes pre-encounter and post-encounter small group activities in which students formulate broad and narrow differential diagnosis respectively. Throughout the session, students discuss risk factors, etiopathogenesis, and history and physical examination findings for the identified differential diagnoses. These small group activities are enhanced by a large group session delivered by a Pathologist-Clinician team that leads student centered CPCOR discussions relevant to the weekly CS case. In addition to the enhanced clinical reasoning skills, the implemented CPCOR process augmented the curricular emphasis of lifelong learning skills while reinforcing the importance of the pathologic basis of the clinical findings. Our streamlined CPCOR process can easily be adapted into other medical school curricula to meet relevant needs of integration and clinical reasoning enhancements.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11273,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diagnosis\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diagnosis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/dx-2023-0173\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnosis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/dx-2023-0173","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对疾病的病理基础及其临床相关性的理解随着科学和医学的相关进步而不断发展。然而,大多数改革后的医学院课程主要针对整体内容整合,较少强调明确构建病理生理学或临床技能(CS)课程中其他相关基础科学的整合。临床病理相关性(CPCOR),当在CS课程中有效设计时,将临床发现与其相关的基础科学基本变化联系起来。在CS课程中定期强调相关CPCORs,可以提高学生临床推理技能的习得,同时激发他们对转化科学的好奇心。六步CPCOR流程,在手稿中详细说明,从制定会议学习目标开始,指导CPCOR内容开发与每周CS案例相关。典型的CPCOR课程包括相遇前和相遇后的小组活动,学生分别制定广义和狭义的鉴别诊断。在整个课程中,学生讨论危险因素、发病机制、病史和鉴别诊断的体检结果。这些小组活动通过病理学家-临床医生团队提供的大型小组会议得到加强,该小组会议引导以学生为中心的CPCOR讨论与每周CS病例相关。除了增强临床推理技能外,CPCOR过程的实施增强了终身学习技能的课程重点,同时加强了临床发现的病理基础的重要性。我们精简的CPCOR流程可以很容易地适应其他医学院的课程,以满足整合和临床推理增强的相关需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Integrating basic sciences and clinical skills: a thread of Clinicopathological Correlations in a Clinical Skill Course.

Understanding the pathologic basis of diseases and their clinical correlates has been growing in parallel to the relevant advances in science and medicine. However, most reformed medical school curricula have mainly addressed the overall content integration with a less emphasis on explicitly structuring the integration of pathophysiology or other relevant basic sciences in clinical skills (CS) courses. Clinicopathologic Correlations (CPCOR), when effectively designed in CS courses, link the clinical findings to their related basic science fundamental changes. Regular highlighting of relevant CPCORs in CS courses enhances student acquisition of clinical reasoning skills and at the same time triggers their translational scientific curiosity. The six-step CPCOR process, detailed in the manuscript, starts with developing session learning objectives that guide CPCOR content development relevant to the weekly CS case. A typical CPCOR session includes pre-encounter and post-encounter small group activities in which students formulate broad and narrow differential diagnosis respectively. Throughout the session, students discuss risk factors, etiopathogenesis, and history and physical examination findings for the identified differential diagnoses. These small group activities are enhanced by a large group session delivered by a Pathologist-Clinician team that leads student centered CPCOR discussions relevant to the weekly CS case. In addition to the enhanced clinical reasoning skills, the implemented CPCOR process augmented the curricular emphasis of lifelong learning skills while reinforcing the importance of the pathologic basis of the clinical findings. Our streamlined CPCOR process can easily be adapted into other medical school curricula to meet relevant needs of integration and clinical reasoning enhancements.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Diagnosis
Diagnosis MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
5.70%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: Diagnosis focuses on how diagnosis can be advanced, how it is taught, and how and why it can fail, leading to diagnostic errors. The journal welcomes both fundamental and applied works, improvement initiatives, opinions, and debates to encourage new thinking on improving this critical aspect of healthcare quality.  Topics: -Factors that promote diagnostic quality and safety -Clinical reasoning -Diagnostic errors in medicine -The factors that contribute to diagnostic error: human factors, cognitive issues, and system-related breakdowns -Improving the value of diagnosis – eliminating waste and unnecessary testing -How culture and removing blame promote awareness of diagnostic errors -Training and education related to clinical reasoning and diagnostic skills -Advances in laboratory testing and imaging that improve diagnostic capability -Local, national and international initiatives to reduce diagnostic error
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信