葡萄糖即时检测标准化质量指标整合建议。

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
Julie L V Shaw, Saranya Arnoldo, Ihssan Bouhtiany, Davor Brinc, Miranda Brun, Christine Collier, Anna Fuezery, Angela W S Fung, Yun Huang, Sukhbir Kaur, Michael Knauer, Elie Kostantin, Lyne Labrecque, Felix Leung, Vinita Thakur, Allison Venner, Paul Yip, Vincent De Guire
{"title":"葡萄糖即时检测标准化质量指标整合建议。","authors":"Julie L V Shaw, Saranya Arnoldo, Ihssan Bouhtiany, Davor Brinc, Miranda Brun, Christine Collier, Anna Fuezery, Angela W S Fung, Yun Huang, Sukhbir Kaur, Michael Knauer, Elie Kostantin, Lyne Labrecque, Felix Leung, Vinita Thakur, Allison Venner, Paul Yip, Vincent De Guire","doi":"10.1515/cclm-2025-0448","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Quality indicator (QI) monitoring is essential to quality assurance for point of care testing (POCT). QI standardization is needed in the POCT field to provide clear guidance to hospitals and produce National and International benchmarks. A central aim was to standardize POCT QIs with existing QIs of the MQI program recommended by the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (IFCC) for central laboratory testing for integration in Comparison programs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Process mapping and risk assessment of the POC glucose testing process were used to establish potential QI. Group consensus was used to rank each potential QI based on the ability to retrieve data for the specific QI. Higher scores were attributed to QI where data could be retrieved electronically and automatically. The highest scoring QI were chosen for follow-up. Members of the working group (authors) were asked to submit data from their own institutions for each QI to evaluate the feasibility of monitoring each QI and to develop preliminary benchmarks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five QI recommendations are provided for glucose POCT, including: positive patient identification, operator training, internal quality control monitoring, external quality assessment and critical results follow-up. Preliminary QI data are presented along with implementation strategies and challenges associated with each recommended QI.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study builds upon previous work by the Canadian Society of Clinical Chemists in developing a process to establish QIs for POCT based on process mapping and risk assessment. The recommended QIs are applicable to most other types of POCT, in addition to glucose testing.</p>","PeriodicalId":10390,"journal":{"name":"Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Recommendations for the integration of standardized quality indicators for glucose point-of-care testing.\",\"authors\":\"Julie L V Shaw, Saranya Arnoldo, Ihssan Bouhtiany, Davor Brinc, Miranda Brun, Christine Collier, Anna Fuezery, Angela W S Fung, Yun Huang, Sukhbir Kaur, Michael Knauer, Elie Kostantin, Lyne Labrecque, Felix Leung, Vinita Thakur, Allison Venner, Paul Yip, Vincent De Guire\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/cclm-2025-0448\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Quality indicator (QI) monitoring is essential to quality assurance for point of care testing (POCT). QI standardization is needed in the POCT field to provide clear guidance to hospitals and produce National and International benchmarks. A central aim was to standardize POCT QIs with existing QIs of the MQI program recommended by the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (IFCC) for central laboratory testing for integration in Comparison programs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Process mapping and risk assessment of the POC glucose testing process were used to establish potential QI. Group consensus was used to rank each potential QI based on the ability to retrieve data for the specific QI. Higher scores were attributed to QI where data could be retrieved electronically and automatically. The highest scoring QI were chosen for follow-up. Members of the working group (authors) were asked to submit data from their own institutions for each QI to evaluate the feasibility of monitoring each QI and to develop preliminary benchmarks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five QI recommendations are provided for glucose POCT, including: positive patient identification, operator training, internal quality control monitoring, external quality assessment and critical results follow-up. Preliminary QI data are presented along with implementation strategies and challenges associated with each recommended QI.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study builds upon previous work by the Canadian Society of Clinical Chemists in developing a process to establish QIs for POCT based on process mapping and risk assessment. The recommended QIs are applicable to most other types of POCT, in addition to glucose testing.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10390,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2025-0448\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2025-0448","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:质量指标(QI)监测对护理点检测(POCT)的质量保证至关重要。POCT领域需要QI标准化,以便为医院提供明确的指导,并制定国家和国际基准。中心目标是将POCT质量指标与国际临床化学和检验医学联合会(IFCC)推荐的MQI项目中现有的质量指标进行标准化,以便将中心实验室测试整合到比较项目中。方法:采用POC血糖检测过程图和风险评价方法建立潜在QI。根据检索特定QI数据的能力,使用群体共识对每个潜在QI进行排序。更高的分数归因于QI,其中数据可以电子和自动检索。选取QI得分最高的进行随访。工作小组成员(作者)须就每项质素保证指标提交各自院校的数据,以评估监测每项质素保证指标的可行性,并制订初步基准。结果:为葡萄糖POCT提供了5项QI建议,包括:阳性患者识别、操作人员培训、内部质量控制监测、外部质量评估和关键结果随访。介绍了QI的初步数据,以及与每个推荐的QI相关的实现策略和挑战。结论:本研究建立在加拿大临床化学家协会之前的工作基础上,该协会基于过程图和风险评估,开发了一个建立POCT质量指标的过程。推荐的QIs适用于大多数其他类型的POCT,除了葡萄糖测试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Recommendations for the integration of standardized quality indicators for glucose point-of-care testing.

Objectives: Quality indicator (QI) monitoring is essential to quality assurance for point of care testing (POCT). QI standardization is needed in the POCT field to provide clear guidance to hospitals and produce National and International benchmarks. A central aim was to standardize POCT QIs with existing QIs of the MQI program recommended by the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (IFCC) for central laboratory testing for integration in Comparison programs.

Methods: Process mapping and risk assessment of the POC glucose testing process were used to establish potential QI. Group consensus was used to rank each potential QI based on the ability to retrieve data for the specific QI. Higher scores were attributed to QI where data could be retrieved electronically and automatically. The highest scoring QI were chosen for follow-up. Members of the working group (authors) were asked to submit data from their own institutions for each QI to evaluate the feasibility of monitoring each QI and to develop preliminary benchmarks.

Results: Five QI recommendations are provided for glucose POCT, including: positive patient identification, operator training, internal quality control monitoring, external quality assessment and critical results follow-up. Preliminary QI data are presented along with implementation strategies and challenges associated with each recommended QI.

Conclusions: This study builds upon previous work by the Canadian Society of Clinical Chemists in developing a process to establish QIs for POCT based on process mapping and risk assessment. The recommended QIs are applicable to most other types of POCT, in addition to glucose testing.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine
Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine 医学-医学实验技术
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
16.20%
发文量
306
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM) publishes articles on novel teaching and training methods applicable to laboratory medicine. CCLM welcomes contributions on the progress in fundamental and applied research and cutting-edge clinical laboratory medicine. It is one of the leading journals in the field, with an impact factor over 3. CCLM is issued monthly, and it is published in print and electronically. CCLM is the official journal of the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM) and publishes regularly EFLM recommendations and news. CCLM is the official journal of the National Societies from Austria (ÖGLMKC); Belgium (RBSLM); Germany (DGKL); Hungary (MLDT); Ireland (ACBI); Italy (SIBioC); Portugal (SPML); and Slovenia (SZKK); and it is affiliated to AACB (Australia) and SFBC (France). Topics: - clinical biochemistry - clinical genomics and molecular biology - clinical haematology and coagulation - clinical immunology and autoimmunity - clinical microbiology - drug monitoring and analysis - evaluation of diagnostic biomarkers - disease-oriented topics (cardiovascular disease, cancer diagnostics, diabetes) - new reagents, instrumentation and technologies - new methodologies - reference materials and methods - reference values and decision limits - quality and safety in laboratory medicine - translational laboratory medicine - clinical metrology Follow @cclm_degruyter on Twitter!
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信