数字化测量护理工具的个性化和协作使用提高了年轻人的参与度:一项混合方法研究。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Min K Chong, Ian B Hickie, Mahalakshmi Ekambareshwar, Adam Poulsen, Sarah McKenna, Alexis Hutcheon, Samuel J Hockey, Elizabeth M Scott, Frank Iorfino
{"title":"数字化测量护理工具的个性化和协作使用提高了年轻人的参与度:一项混合方法研究。","authors":"Min K Chong, Ian B Hickie, Mahalakshmi Ekambareshwar, Adam Poulsen, Sarah McKenna, Alexis Hutcheon, Samuel J Hockey, Elizabeth M Scott, Frank Iorfino","doi":"10.1186/s12913-025-12889-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Measurement-based care (MBC) enables personalised and proactive mental healthcare through regular symptom monitoring and review, allowing clinicians to make timely adjustments to clients' interventions for improved outcomes. Yet, its uptake in youth mental health services remains minimal. This study aims to explore perceived barriers and facilitators for sustained use of MBC and potential of digital technologies to enhance its engagement in young adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A mixed-methods study, comprising focus groups and surveys, was conducted with young adults who had previously accessed mental health services. Template analysis was used to analyze qualitative data, and descriptive analyses were performed with quantitative data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighteen young adults (mean age = 21.7 years; SD = 3.4) participated in this study. Survey results showed that young adults agreed with the value of MBC in their care (15/18) and reported low rates of discomfort with progress evaluation (11/18). Focus groups revealed collaborative data review with clinicians as a key facilitator in MBC uptake, driving repeated engagement with data input and review. Participants expressed that generalized interpretation of data that does not consider individual context, and the use of standard measures that were perceived to be irrelevant to their personal treatment goals discouraged their future engagement with MBC. Digital features that improve accessibility and data interpretation were expected to enhance consistent engagement with MBC.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings indicate that the motivation and sustained engagement in MBC stem from young adults' comprehension of how collected data fosters shared decision-making and personalize treatment. Therefore, regular, collaborative data reviews would be crucial in cultivating a sense of autonomy and purpose within MBC for young adults. This study highlights the importance of data review in enhancing the uptake of MBC, a factor that is often overlooked. By demonstrating this, the study provides a deeper understanding of motivators in MBC and valuable insights for mental health services to explore strategies that could support clinicians to integrate data review as part of routine care. To this end, one effective approach could be developing technologies that facilitate client-clinician communication and empower young adults to advocate for personalized care.</p>","PeriodicalId":9012,"journal":{"name":"BMC Health Services Research","volume":"25 1","pages":"752"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Personalized and collaborative use of digital measurement-based care tools enhances engagement among young adults: a mixed-methods study.\",\"authors\":\"Min K Chong, Ian B Hickie, Mahalakshmi Ekambareshwar, Adam Poulsen, Sarah McKenna, Alexis Hutcheon, Samuel J Hockey, Elizabeth M Scott, Frank Iorfino\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12913-025-12889-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Measurement-based care (MBC) enables personalised and proactive mental healthcare through regular symptom monitoring and review, allowing clinicians to make timely adjustments to clients' interventions for improved outcomes. Yet, its uptake in youth mental health services remains minimal. This study aims to explore perceived barriers and facilitators for sustained use of MBC and potential of digital technologies to enhance its engagement in young adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A mixed-methods study, comprising focus groups and surveys, was conducted with young adults who had previously accessed mental health services. Template analysis was used to analyze qualitative data, and descriptive analyses were performed with quantitative data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighteen young adults (mean age = 21.7 years; SD = 3.4) participated in this study. Survey results showed that young adults agreed with the value of MBC in their care (15/18) and reported low rates of discomfort with progress evaluation (11/18). Focus groups revealed collaborative data review with clinicians as a key facilitator in MBC uptake, driving repeated engagement with data input and review. Participants expressed that generalized interpretation of data that does not consider individual context, and the use of standard measures that were perceived to be irrelevant to their personal treatment goals discouraged their future engagement with MBC. Digital features that improve accessibility and data interpretation were expected to enhance consistent engagement with MBC.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings indicate that the motivation and sustained engagement in MBC stem from young adults' comprehension of how collected data fosters shared decision-making and personalize treatment. Therefore, regular, collaborative data reviews would be crucial in cultivating a sense of autonomy and purpose within MBC for young adults. This study highlights the importance of data review in enhancing the uptake of MBC, a factor that is often overlooked. By demonstrating this, the study provides a deeper understanding of motivators in MBC and valuable insights for mental health services to explore strategies that could support clinicians to integrate data review as part of routine care. To this end, one effective approach could be developing technologies that facilitate client-clinician communication and empower young adults to advocate for personalized care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9012,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Health Services Research\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"752\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Health Services Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-025-12889-1\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-025-12889-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:基于测量的护理(MBC)通过定期的症状监测和审查实现个性化和主动的心理保健,使临床医生能够及时调整客户的干预措施,以改善结果。然而,它在青少年心理健康服务中的应用仍然很少。本研究旨在探讨持续使用MBC的障碍和促进因素以及数字技术的潜力,以提高年轻人对MBC的参与度。方法:一项混合方法研究,包括焦点小组和调查,对以前接受过精神卫生服务的年轻人进行了研究。定性资料采用模板分析,定量资料采用描述性分析。结果:18名青壮年(平均年龄21.7岁;SD = 3.4)参加本研究。调查结果显示,年轻人同意MBC在他们的护理中的价值(15/18),对进展评估的不应率较低(11/18)。焦点小组显示,与临床医生合作的数据审查是MBC吸收的关键促进者,推动了数据输入和审查的反复参与。参与者表示,不考虑个人背景的数据的广义解释,以及被认为与个人治疗目标无关的标准措施的使用,阻碍了他们未来与MBC的接触。提高可访问性和数据解释的数字功能有望加强与MBC的一致接触。结论:研究结果表明,年轻人参与MBC的动机和持续参与源于他们对收集数据如何促进共同决策和个性化治疗的理解。因此,定期、协作的数据审查对于培养年轻人在MBC内部的自主性和使命感至关重要。这项研究强调了数据审查在提高MBC吸收方面的重要性,这是一个经常被忽视的因素。通过证明这一点,本研究提供了对MBC激励因素的更深入理解,并为精神卫生服务探索支持临床医生将数据审查作为常规护理一部分的策略提供了有价值的见解。为此,一种有效的方法是开发技术,促进客户与临床医生的沟通,并使年轻人能够倡导个性化护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Personalized and collaborative use of digital measurement-based care tools enhances engagement among young adults: a mixed-methods study.

Background: Measurement-based care (MBC) enables personalised and proactive mental healthcare through regular symptom monitoring and review, allowing clinicians to make timely adjustments to clients' interventions for improved outcomes. Yet, its uptake in youth mental health services remains minimal. This study aims to explore perceived barriers and facilitators for sustained use of MBC and potential of digital technologies to enhance its engagement in young adults.

Methods: A mixed-methods study, comprising focus groups and surveys, was conducted with young adults who had previously accessed mental health services. Template analysis was used to analyze qualitative data, and descriptive analyses were performed with quantitative data.

Results: Eighteen young adults (mean age = 21.7 years; SD = 3.4) participated in this study. Survey results showed that young adults agreed with the value of MBC in their care (15/18) and reported low rates of discomfort with progress evaluation (11/18). Focus groups revealed collaborative data review with clinicians as a key facilitator in MBC uptake, driving repeated engagement with data input and review. Participants expressed that generalized interpretation of data that does not consider individual context, and the use of standard measures that were perceived to be irrelevant to their personal treatment goals discouraged their future engagement with MBC. Digital features that improve accessibility and data interpretation were expected to enhance consistent engagement with MBC.

Conclusions: The findings indicate that the motivation and sustained engagement in MBC stem from young adults' comprehension of how collected data fosters shared decision-making and personalize treatment. Therefore, regular, collaborative data reviews would be crucial in cultivating a sense of autonomy and purpose within MBC for young adults. This study highlights the importance of data review in enhancing the uptake of MBC, a factor that is often overlooked. By demonstrating this, the study provides a deeper understanding of motivators in MBC and valuable insights for mental health services to explore strategies that could support clinicians to integrate data review as part of routine care. To this end, one effective approach could be developing technologies that facilitate client-clinician communication and empower young adults to advocate for personalized care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Health Services Research
BMC Health Services Research 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
1372
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Health Services Research is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of health services research, including delivery of care, management of health services, assessment of healthcare needs, measurement of outcomes, allocation of healthcare resources, evaluation of different health markets and health services organizations, international comparative analysis of health systems, health economics and the impact of health policies and regulations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信