{"title":"CEBPA bZIP标记在细胞遗传学正常的急性髓性白血病中的预后价值。","authors":"Li-Xin Wu, Ming-Yue Liao, Ming-Yue Zhao, Nan Yan, Ping Zhang, Li-Xia Liu, Jia-Yue Qin, Shan-Bo Cao, Jia Feng, Qian Jiang, Ying-Jun Chang, Lan-Ping Xu, Xiao-Hui Zhang, Xiao-Jun Huang, Hao Jiang, Hong-Yu Zhang, Guo-Rui Ruan","doi":"10.1111/bjh.20164","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Recent studies revealed that CEBPA with basic leucine zipper (bZIP) in-frame mutation (CEBPA<sup>bZIP-inf</sup>) is the bona fide entity with a favourable prognosis in acute myeloid leukaemia. However, the mechanism by which the bZIP signatures influence risk stratification remains unclear. We identified 141 patients with CEBPA<sup>bZIP-inf</sup>. Variant allele fraction (VAF) (cumulative incidence of relapse [CIR], VAF<sup>high</sup> vs. VAF<sup>low</sup>, 74.0% vs. 27.0%, p < 0.001) and base change (≤ vs. >3 bases, 39.1% vs. 60.6%, p = 0.042) of bZIP mutations were associated with CIR. These two factors, along with the white blood cell count and measurable residual disease after first consolidation, could stratify patients into three risk subgroups (CIR, low vs. medium vs. high risk, 15.2% vs. 47.1% vs. 83.0%, p < 0.001). Compared with no transplantation, receiving a transplantation significantly decreased the relapse rates in medium-risk (transplantation vs. no transplantation, 11.6% vs. 49.7%, p = 0.009) and high-risk patients (5.6% vs. 84.1%, p < 0.001) but not low-risk (0% vs. 15.2%, p = 0.220). However, only high-risk patients could benefit from transplantation in terms of overall survival (100% vs. 59.7%, p = 0.003). Our study revealed the heterogeneity of CEBPA<sup>bZIP-inf</sup> patients and suggested a risk-adapted treatment modality. Transplantation is recommended for high-risk patients and consolidation chemotherapy is recommended for low-risk and medium-risk patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":135,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Haematology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prognostic value of CEBPA bZIP signatures in cytogenetically normal acute myeloid leukaemia.\",\"authors\":\"Li-Xin Wu, Ming-Yue Liao, Ming-Yue Zhao, Nan Yan, Ping Zhang, Li-Xia Liu, Jia-Yue Qin, Shan-Bo Cao, Jia Feng, Qian Jiang, Ying-Jun Chang, Lan-Ping Xu, Xiao-Hui Zhang, Xiao-Jun Huang, Hao Jiang, Hong-Yu Zhang, Guo-Rui Ruan\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/bjh.20164\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Recent studies revealed that CEBPA with basic leucine zipper (bZIP) in-frame mutation (CEBPA<sup>bZIP-inf</sup>) is the bona fide entity with a favourable prognosis in acute myeloid leukaemia. However, the mechanism by which the bZIP signatures influence risk stratification remains unclear. We identified 141 patients with CEBPA<sup>bZIP-inf</sup>. Variant allele fraction (VAF) (cumulative incidence of relapse [CIR], VAF<sup>high</sup> vs. VAF<sup>low</sup>, 74.0% vs. 27.0%, p < 0.001) and base change (≤ vs. >3 bases, 39.1% vs. 60.6%, p = 0.042) of bZIP mutations were associated with CIR. These two factors, along with the white blood cell count and measurable residual disease after first consolidation, could stratify patients into three risk subgroups (CIR, low vs. medium vs. high risk, 15.2% vs. 47.1% vs. 83.0%, p < 0.001). Compared with no transplantation, receiving a transplantation significantly decreased the relapse rates in medium-risk (transplantation vs. no transplantation, 11.6% vs. 49.7%, p = 0.009) and high-risk patients (5.6% vs. 84.1%, p < 0.001) but not low-risk (0% vs. 15.2%, p = 0.220). However, only high-risk patients could benefit from transplantation in terms of overall survival (100% vs. 59.7%, p = 0.003). Our study revealed the heterogeneity of CEBPA<sup>bZIP-inf</sup> patients and suggested a risk-adapted treatment modality. Transplantation is recommended for high-risk patients and consolidation chemotherapy is recommended for low-risk and medium-risk patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":135,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal of Haematology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal of Haematology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/bjh.20164\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Haematology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/bjh.20164","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
最近的研究表明,具有碱性亮氨酸拉链(bZIP)框架内突变(CEBPAbZIP-inf)的CEBPA是急性髓系白血病中具有良好预后的真正实体。然而,bZIP特征影响风险分层的机制尚不清楚。我们确定了141例CEBPAbZIP-inf患者。bZIP突变的变异等位基因分数(VAF)(累积复发率[CIR], VAFhigh vs. VAFlow, 74.0% vs. 27.0%, 3个碱基,39.1% vs. 60.6%, p = 0.042)与CIR相关,这两个因素,以及白细胞计数和首次巩固后可测量的残留疾病,可以将患者分为三个风险亚组(CIR,低、中、高风险,15.2% vs. 47.1% vs. 83.0%, p bZIP-inf患者,并建议风险适应的治疗方式。高危患者推荐移植,低危和中危患者推荐巩固化疗。
Prognostic value of CEBPA bZIP signatures in cytogenetically normal acute myeloid leukaemia.
Recent studies revealed that CEBPA with basic leucine zipper (bZIP) in-frame mutation (CEBPAbZIP-inf) is the bona fide entity with a favourable prognosis in acute myeloid leukaemia. However, the mechanism by which the bZIP signatures influence risk stratification remains unclear. We identified 141 patients with CEBPAbZIP-inf. Variant allele fraction (VAF) (cumulative incidence of relapse [CIR], VAFhigh vs. VAFlow, 74.0% vs. 27.0%, p < 0.001) and base change (≤ vs. >3 bases, 39.1% vs. 60.6%, p = 0.042) of bZIP mutations were associated with CIR. These two factors, along with the white blood cell count and measurable residual disease after first consolidation, could stratify patients into three risk subgroups (CIR, low vs. medium vs. high risk, 15.2% vs. 47.1% vs. 83.0%, p < 0.001). Compared with no transplantation, receiving a transplantation significantly decreased the relapse rates in medium-risk (transplantation vs. no transplantation, 11.6% vs. 49.7%, p = 0.009) and high-risk patients (5.6% vs. 84.1%, p < 0.001) but not low-risk (0% vs. 15.2%, p = 0.220). However, only high-risk patients could benefit from transplantation in terms of overall survival (100% vs. 59.7%, p = 0.003). Our study revealed the heterogeneity of CEBPAbZIP-inf patients and suggested a risk-adapted treatment modality. Transplantation is recommended for high-risk patients and consolidation chemotherapy is recommended for low-risk and medium-risk patients.
期刊介绍:
The British Journal of Haematology publishes original research papers in clinical, laboratory and experimental haematology. The Journal also features annotations, reviews, short reports, images in haematology and Letters to the Editor.