风险适应北欧肛门癌组共识指南对肛门癌选择性临床靶体积轮廓的影响。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Marcus Johnsson, Sara Alkner, Anders Johnsson, Martin Nilsson
{"title":"风险适应北欧肛门癌组共识指南对肛门癌选择性临床靶体积轮廓的影响。","authors":"Marcus Johnsson, Sara Alkner, Anders Johnsson, Martin Nilsson","doi":"10.2340/1651-226X.2025.42723","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>The recently published Nordic anal cancer group (NOAC) contouring guidelines aim for improved oncological outcomes and reduced toxicity in anal cancer patients treated with radiotherapy. The present work describes how the elective clinical target volume (CTVe) would change when applying the NOAC guidelines instead of the previous Australasian standard. According to the Australasian guidelines, the cranial border of the CTVe is at the common iliac bifurcation for all patients, and the external iliac region as well as the ischiorectal fossa are always included.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Retrospectively, 166 anal cancer patients treated with curative radiotherapy according to Australasian guidelines between 2009 and 2017 were studied in a single-center analysis. Pretherapeutic scans, and clinical information were used to categorize patients according to the NOAC guidelines for a comparison with the Australasian guidelines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Applying the risk-adapted alternative of the NOAC guidelines had the external iliac region omitted in 41.0% of the patients. The cranial border was lowered from the common iliac bifurcation in 27.7% and elevated in 12.7% of the patients. Elderly patients (≥70 years) more often had the external iliac region omitted than younger patients (60.9% vs. 33.3%; p = 0.001). The entire ischiorectal fossa was included in 23.7% of the patients due to tumor extension beyond the levator ani muscles or external sphincter.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Contouring according to the NOAC risk-adapted guidelines changed, and mainly reduced, the CTVe in about half of all patients. Prospective follow-up is needed to determine if this is clinically beneficial.</p>","PeriodicalId":7110,"journal":{"name":"Acta Oncologica","volume":"64 ","pages":"708-714"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12128630/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of the risk-adapted Nordic anal cancer group consensus guidelines on the contouring of the elective clinical target volume in anal cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Marcus Johnsson, Sara Alkner, Anders Johnsson, Martin Nilsson\",\"doi\":\"10.2340/1651-226X.2025.42723\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>The recently published Nordic anal cancer group (NOAC) contouring guidelines aim for improved oncological outcomes and reduced toxicity in anal cancer patients treated with radiotherapy. The present work describes how the elective clinical target volume (CTVe) would change when applying the NOAC guidelines instead of the previous Australasian standard. According to the Australasian guidelines, the cranial border of the CTVe is at the common iliac bifurcation for all patients, and the external iliac region as well as the ischiorectal fossa are always included.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Retrospectively, 166 anal cancer patients treated with curative radiotherapy according to Australasian guidelines between 2009 and 2017 were studied in a single-center analysis. Pretherapeutic scans, and clinical information were used to categorize patients according to the NOAC guidelines for a comparison with the Australasian guidelines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Applying the risk-adapted alternative of the NOAC guidelines had the external iliac region omitted in 41.0% of the patients. The cranial border was lowered from the common iliac bifurcation in 27.7% and elevated in 12.7% of the patients. Elderly patients (≥70 years) more often had the external iliac region omitted than younger patients (60.9% vs. 33.3%; p = 0.001). The entire ischiorectal fossa was included in 23.7% of the patients due to tumor extension beyond the levator ani muscles or external sphincter.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Contouring according to the NOAC risk-adapted guidelines changed, and mainly reduced, the CTVe in about half of all patients. Prospective follow-up is needed to determine if this is clinically beneficial.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7110,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Oncologica\",\"volume\":\"64 \",\"pages\":\"708-714\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12128630/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Oncologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2340/1651-226X.2025.42723\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Oncologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2340/1651-226X.2025.42723","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:最近发表的北欧肛门癌组(NOAC)轮廓指南旨在改善肛门癌放疗患者的肿瘤预后和降低毒性。目前的工作描述了当应用NOAC指南而不是以前的澳大拉西亚标准时,选择性临床靶体积(CTVe)将如何变化。根据澳大利亚指南,所有患者CTVe的颅边界均位于髂总分叉处,髂外区和坐骨直肠窝均包括在内。材料与方法:回顾性分析2009年至2017年期间按照澳大利亚指南进行根治性放疗的166例肛管癌患者的单中心分析。治疗前扫描和临床信息被用于根据NOAC指南对患者进行分类,并与澳大利亚指南进行比较。结果:应用NOAC指南的风险适应替代方案,41.0%的患者省略了髂外区域。颅边界从髂总分叉处降低的占27.7%,升高的占12.7%。老年患者(≥70岁)比年轻患者更常忽略髂外区(60.9% vs. 33.3%;P = 0.001)。23.7%的患者因肿瘤超出提肛肌或外括约肌而累及整个坐骨直肠窝。解释:根据NOAC风险适应指南的轮廓改变了大约一半患者的CTVe,主要是降低了CTVe。需要前瞻性随访来确定这在临床上是否有益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Impact of the risk-adapted Nordic anal cancer group consensus guidelines on the contouring of the elective clinical target volume in anal cancer.

Impact of the risk-adapted Nordic anal cancer group consensus guidelines on the contouring of the elective clinical target volume in anal cancer.

Impact of the risk-adapted Nordic anal cancer group consensus guidelines on the contouring of the elective clinical target volume in anal cancer.

Impact of the risk-adapted Nordic anal cancer group consensus guidelines on the contouring of the elective clinical target volume in anal cancer.

Background and purpose: The recently published Nordic anal cancer group (NOAC) contouring guidelines aim for improved oncological outcomes and reduced toxicity in anal cancer patients treated with radiotherapy. The present work describes how the elective clinical target volume (CTVe) would change when applying the NOAC guidelines instead of the previous Australasian standard. According to the Australasian guidelines, the cranial border of the CTVe is at the common iliac bifurcation for all patients, and the external iliac region as well as the ischiorectal fossa are always included.

Materials and methods: Retrospectively, 166 anal cancer patients treated with curative radiotherapy according to Australasian guidelines between 2009 and 2017 were studied in a single-center analysis. Pretherapeutic scans, and clinical information were used to categorize patients according to the NOAC guidelines for a comparison with the Australasian guidelines.

Results: Applying the risk-adapted alternative of the NOAC guidelines had the external iliac region omitted in 41.0% of the patients. The cranial border was lowered from the common iliac bifurcation in 27.7% and elevated in 12.7% of the patients. Elderly patients (≥70 years) more often had the external iliac region omitted than younger patients (60.9% vs. 33.3%; p = 0.001). The entire ischiorectal fossa was included in 23.7% of the patients due to tumor extension beyond the levator ani muscles or external sphincter.

Interpretation: Contouring according to the NOAC risk-adapted guidelines changed, and mainly reduced, the CTVe in about half of all patients. Prospective follow-up is needed to determine if this is clinically beneficial.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Oncologica
Acta Oncologica 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
3.20%
发文量
301
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Acta Oncologica is a journal for the clinical oncologist and accepts articles within all fields of clinical cancer research. Articles on tumour pathology, experimental oncology, radiobiology, cancer epidemiology and medical radio physics are also welcome, especially if they have a clinical aim or interest. Scientific articles on cancer nursing and psychological or social aspects of cancer are also welcomed. Extensive material may be published as Supplements, for which special conditions apply.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信