用拉曼光谱法鉴别和追踪米粉掺假的模型比较分析

IF 3.2 2区 农林科学 Q2 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Xingyan Li, Liyuan Zhang, Runzhong Yu
{"title":"用拉曼光谱法鉴别和追踪米粉掺假的模型比较分析","authors":"Xingyan Li,&nbsp;Liyuan Zhang,&nbsp;Runzhong Yu","doi":"10.1111/1750-3841.70272","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>To address the issue of rice flour adulteration, where lower-cost rice flour is mixed with higher-grade varieties to reduce costs, this work proposes a rapid identification method using Raman spectroscopy. Rice varieties from Heilongjiang Province were selected for adulteration experiments, in which Longqingdao 8 (LQD) was mixed with Sanjiang 6, Longyang 16, Suijing 18, Longdao 18, and Daohuaxiang 2 in varying proportions. Six machine learning models were employed for classification, with four different preprocessing methods. The models’ performance was evaluated using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, and key characteristic bands for each rice variety were identified. For Sanjiang 6, the optimal preprocessing method was standard normal transformation, and the best-performing model was the artificial neural network, which achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 96.2% and an accuracy of 94.8%. For Daohuaxiang 2, smoothing forest and random forest yielded the best results, with an AUC of 92.4% and an accuracy of 94.8%. Similarly, for Longdao 18, standard normal transformation and artificial neural network provided the highest accuracy (99.6%) with an AUC of 99.3%. Longyang 16 also showed optimal results with standard normal transformation and artificial neural network, achieving an AUC of 93.7% and an accuracy of 96.6%. Finally, for Suijing 18, multivariate scattering correction and random forest were the most effective, with an AUC of 99.3% and an accuracy of 99.6%. This comparative analysis of traceability models demonstrates a promising approach to identifying rice flour adulteration. The identification of compounds influencing different rice varieties further enhances the traceability of rice types, providing a robust reference for future studies.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":193,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Food Science","volume":"90 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Analysis of Models for Identifying and Tracing Rice Flour Adulteration Using Raman Spectroscopy\",\"authors\":\"Xingyan Li,&nbsp;Liyuan Zhang,&nbsp;Runzhong Yu\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1750-3841.70272\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>To address the issue of rice flour adulteration, where lower-cost rice flour is mixed with higher-grade varieties to reduce costs, this work proposes a rapid identification method using Raman spectroscopy. Rice varieties from Heilongjiang Province were selected for adulteration experiments, in which Longqingdao 8 (LQD) was mixed with Sanjiang 6, Longyang 16, Suijing 18, Longdao 18, and Daohuaxiang 2 in varying proportions. Six machine learning models were employed for classification, with four different preprocessing methods. The models’ performance was evaluated using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, and key characteristic bands for each rice variety were identified. For Sanjiang 6, the optimal preprocessing method was standard normal transformation, and the best-performing model was the artificial neural network, which achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 96.2% and an accuracy of 94.8%. For Daohuaxiang 2, smoothing forest and random forest yielded the best results, with an AUC of 92.4% and an accuracy of 94.8%. Similarly, for Longdao 18, standard normal transformation and artificial neural network provided the highest accuracy (99.6%) with an AUC of 99.3%. Longyang 16 also showed optimal results with standard normal transformation and artificial neural network, achieving an AUC of 93.7% and an accuracy of 96.6%. Finally, for Suijing 18, multivariate scattering correction and random forest were the most effective, with an AUC of 99.3% and an accuracy of 99.6%. This comparative analysis of traceability models demonstrates a promising approach to identifying rice flour adulteration. The identification of compounds influencing different rice varieties further enhances the traceability of rice types, providing a robust reference for future studies.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":193,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Food Science\",\"volume\":\"90 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Food Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1750-3841.70272\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Food Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1750-3841.70272","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了解决米粉掺假问题,将低成本的米粉与高质量的米粉混合以降低成本,本工作提出了一种使用拉曼光谱的快速识别方法。选择黑龙江省水稻品种,将龙青8号(LQD)与三江6号、龙阳16号、穗粳18号、龙稻18号、稻花香2号按不同比例掺假。使用6个机器学习模型进行分类,采用4种不同的预处理方法。利用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线对模型的性能进行了评价,并确定了每个水稻品种的关键特征波段。对于三江6号,最佳预处理方法为标准正态变换,最佳预处理模型为人工神经网络,曲线下面积(AUC)为96.2%,准确率为94.8%。稻花香2号以平滑森林和随机森林效果最好,AUC为92.4%,准确率为94.8%。同样,对于龙岛18号,标准正态变换和人工神经网络的准确率最高(99.6%),AUC为99.3%。采用标准正态变换与人工神经网络相结合,龙阳16号的AUC为93.7%,准确率为96.6%。最后,对于穗粳18号,多变量散射校正和随机森林校正效果最好,AUC为99.3%,准确率为99.6%。这种可追溯性模型的比较分析表明了一种有前途的方法来识别米粉掺假。影响不同水稻品种的化合物的鉴定进一步增强了水稻品种的可追溯性,为今后的研究提供了有力的参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative Analysis of Models for Identifying and Tracing Rice Flour Adulteration Using Raman Spectroscopy

To address the issue of rice flour adulteration, where lower-cost rice flour is mixed with higher-grade varieties to reduce costs, this work proposes a rapid identification method using Raman spectroscopy. Rice varieties from Heilongjiang Province were selected for adulteration experiments, in which Longqingdao 8 (LQD) was mixed with Sanjiang 6, Longyang 16, Suijing 18, Longdao 18, and Daohuaxiang 2 in varying proportions. Six machine learning models were employed for classification, with four different preprocessing methods. The models’ performance was evaluated using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, and key characteristic bands for each rice variety were identified. For Sanjiang 6, the optimal preprocessing method was standard normal transformation, and the best-performing model was the artificial neural network, which achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 96.2% and an accuracy of 94.8%. For Daohuaxiang 2, smoothing forest and random forest yielded the best results, with an AUC of 92.4% and an accuracy of 94.8%. Similarly, for Longdao 18, standard normal transformation and artificial neural network provided the highest accuracy (99.6%) with an AUC of 99.3%. Longyang 16 also showed optimal results with standard normal transformation and artificial neural network, achieving an AUC of 93.7% and an accuracy of 96.6%. Finally, for Suijing 18, multivariate scattering correction and random forest were the most effective, with an AUC of 99.3% and an accuracy of 99.6%. This comparative analysis of traceability models demonstrates a promising approach to identifying rice flour adulteration. The identification of compounds influencing different rice varieties further enhances the traceability of rice types, providing a robust reference for future studies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Food Science
Journal of Food Science 工程技术-食品科技
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
2.60%
发文量
412
审稿时长
3.1 months
期刊介绍: The goal of the Journal of Food Science is to offer scientists, researchers, and other food professionals the opportunity to share knowledge of scientific advancements in the myriad disciplines affecting their work, through a respected peer-reviewed publication. The Journal of Food Science serves as an international forum for vital research and developments in food science. The range of topics covered in the journal include: -Concise Reviews and Hypotheses in Food Science -New Horizons in Food Research -Integrated Food Science -Food Chemistry -Food Engineering, Materials Science, and Nanotechnology -Food Microbiology and Safety -Sensory and Consumer Sciences -Health, Nutrition, and Food -Toxicology and Chemical Food Safety The Journal of Food Science publishes peer-reviewed articles that cover all aspects of food science, including safety and nutrition. Reviews should be 15 to 50 typewritten pages (including tables, figures, and references), should provide in-depth coverage of a narrowly defined topic, and should embody careful evaluation (weaknesses, strengths, explanation of discrepancies in results among similar studies) of all pertinent studies, so that insightful interpretations and conclusions can be presented. Hypothesis papers are especially appropriate in pioneering areas of research or important areas that are afflicted by scientific controversy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信