{"title":"用拉曼光谱法鉴别和追踪米粉掺假的模型比较分析","authors":"Xingyan Li, Liyuan Zhang, Runzhong Yu","doi":"10.1111/1750-3841.70272","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>To address the issue of rice flour adulteration, where lower-cost rice flour is mixed with higher-grade varieties to reduce costs, this work proposes a rapid identification method using Raman spectroscopy. Rice varieties from Heilongjiang Province were selected for adulteration experiments, in which Longqingdao 8 (LQD) was mixed with Sanjiang 6, Longyang 16, Suijing 18, Longdao 18, and Daohuaxiang 2 in varying proportions. Six machine learning models were employed for classification, with four different preprocessing methods. The models’ performance was evaluated using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, and key characteristic bands for each rice variety were identified. For Sanjiang 6, the optimal preprocessing method was standard normal transformation, and the best-performing model was the artificial neural network, which achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 96.2% and an accuracy of 94.8%. For Daohuaxiang 2, smoothing forest and random forest yielded the best results, with an AUC of 92.4% and an accuracy of 94.8%. Similarly, for Longdao 18, standard normal transformation and artificial neural network provided the highest accuracy (99.6%) with an AUC of 99.3%. Longyang 16 also showed optimal results with standard normal transformation and artificial neural network, achieving an AUC of 93.7% and an accuracy of 96.6%. Finally, for Suijing 18, multivariate scattering correction and random forest were the most effective, with an AUC of 99.3% and an accuracy of 99.6%. This comparative analysis of traceability models demonstrates a promising approach to identifying rice flour adulteration. The identification of compounds influencing different rice varieties further enhances the traceability of rice types, providing a robust reference for future studies.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":193,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Food Science","volume":"90 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Analysis of Models for Identifying and Tracing Rice Flour Adulteration Using Raman Spectroscopy\",\"authors\":\"Xingyan Li, Liyuan Zhang, Runzhong Yu\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1750-3841.70272\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>To address the issue of rice flour adulteration, where lower-cost rice flour is mixed with higher-grade varieties to reduce costs, this work proposes a rapid identification method using Raman spectroscopy. Rice varieties from Heilongjiang Province were selected for adulteration experiments, in which Longqingdao 8 (LQD) was mixed with Sanjiang 6, Longyang 16, Suijing 18, Longdao 18, and Daohuaxiang 2 in varying proportions. Six machine learning models were employed for classification, with four different preprocessing methods. The models’ performance was evaluated using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, and key characteristic bands for each rice variety were identified. For Sanjiang 6, the optimal preprocessing method was standard normal transformation, and the best-performing model was the artificial neural network, which achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 96.2% and an accuracy of 94.8%. For Daohuaxiang 2, smoothing forest and random forest yielded the best results, with an AUC of 92.4% and an accuracy of 94.8%. Similarly, for Longdao 18, standard normal transformation and artificial neural network provided the highest accuracy (99.6%) with an AUC of 99.3%. Longyang 16 also showed optimal results with standard normal transformation and artificial neural network, achieving an AUC of 93.7% and an accuracy of 96.6%. Finally, for Suijing 18, multivariate scattering correction and random forest were the most effective, with an AUC of 99.3% and an accuracy of 99.6%. This comparative analysis of traceability models demonstrates a promising approach to identifying rice flour adulteration. The identification of compounds influencing different rice varieties further enhances the traceability of rice types, providing a robust reference for future studies.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":193,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Food Science\",\"volume\":\"90 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Food Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1750-3841.70272\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Food Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1750-3841.70272","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparative Analysis of Models for Identifying and Tracing Rice Flour Adulteration Using Raman Spectroscopy
To address the issue of rice flour adulteration, where lower-cost rice flour is mixed with higher-grade varieties to reduce costs, this work proposes a rapid identification method using Raman spectroscopy. Rice varieties from Heilongjiang Province were selected for adulteration experiments, in which Longqingdao 8 (LQD) was mixed with Sanjiang 6, Longyang 16, Suijing 18, Longdao 18, and Daohuaxiang 2 in varying proportions. Six machine learning models were employed for classification, with four different preprocessing methods. The models’ performance was evaluated using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, and key characteristic bands for each rice variety were identified. For Sanjiang 6, the optimal preprocessing method was standard normal transformation, and the best-performing model was the artificial neural network, which achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 96.2% and an accuracy of 94.8%. For Daohuaxiang 2, smoothing forest and random forest yielded the best results, with an AUC of 92.4% and an accuracy of 94.8%. Similarly, for Longdao 18, standard normal transformation and artificial neural network provided the highest accuracy (99.6%) with an AUC of 99.3%. Longyang 16 also showed optimal results with standard normal transformation and artificial neural network, achieving an AUC of 93.7% and an accuracy of 96.6%. Finally, for Suijing 18, multivariate scattering correction and random forest were the most effective, with an AUC of 99.3% and an accuracy of 99.6%. This comparative analysis of traceability models demonstrates a promising approach to identifying rice flour adulteration. The identification of compounds influencing different rice varieties further enhances the traceability of rice types, providing a robust reference for future studies.
期刊介绍:
The goal of the Journal of Food Science is to offer scientists, researchers, and other food professionals the opportunity to share knowledge of scientific advancements in the myriad disciplines affecting their work, through a respected peer-reviewed publication. The Journal of Food Science serves as an international forum for vital research and developments in food science.
The range of topics covered in the journal include:
-Concise Reviews and Hypotheses in Food Science
-New Horizons in Food Research
-Integrated Food Science
-Food Chemistry
-Food Engineering, Materials Science, and Nanotechnology
-Food Microbiology and Safety
-Sensory and Consumer Sciences
-Health, Nutrition, and Food
-Toxicology and Chemical Food Safety
The Journal of Food Science publishes peer-reviewed articles that cover all aspects of food science, including safety and nutrition. Reviews should be 15 to 50 typewritten pages (including tables, figures, and references), should provide in-depth coverage of a narrowly defined topic, and should embody careful evaluation (weaknesses, strengths, explanation of discrepancies in results among similar studies) of all pertinent studies, so that insightful interpretations and conclusions can be presented. Hypothesis papers are especially appropriate in pioneering areas of research or important areas that are afflicted by scientific controversy.