假体周围关节感染的2期换药治疗中的抗生素假期:范围综述。

Andrew Fraval,Daniel Gould,Mehmet Kursat Yilmaz,Alex Soriano,Javad Parvizi
{"title":"假体周围关节感染的2期换药治疗中的抗生素假期:范围综述。","authors":"Andrew Fraval,Daniel Gould,Mehmet Kursat Yilmaz,Alex Soriano,Javad Parvizi","doi":"10.2106/jbjs.24.01275","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nThe use of a 2-stage exchange remains a common management strategy for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). The use of an \"antibiotic holiday\" before the second stage to confirm the clearance of infection is often employed, but there is little evidence to guide this practice. The aim of this review was to systematically map the literature reporting on the use of an antibiotic holiday as part of a 2-stage revision for chronic PJI and to answer the question: is there a role for an antibiotic holiday in patients undergoing 2-stage exchange arthroplasty for PJI?\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nGiven the heterogeneity of the literature on this topic, a Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA)-compliant scoping review was conducted. Two reviewers developed and refined the search strategy and study eligibility criteria and pilot-tested the data charting form prior to data extraction. Data were analyzed descriptively.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nThree databases were screened, with 504 full-text articles retrieved for review after screening 2,579 titles and abstracts. Of these, 243 were included for data charting. Most studies (238 of 243; 97.9%) were case series, and the remaining 5 (2.1%) were cohort studies that incorporated a direct comparison between continuous therapy and an antibiotic holiday. Most case series (202 of 238; 84.9%) utilized an antibiotic holiday. The proportion of patients who experienced treatment failure in the continuous therapy group (271 of 2,074 patients; 13.1%) was lower than that in the antibiotic holiday group (2,843 of 17,329 patients; 16.4%; p < 0.001). There was a greater proportion of studies with a between-stage interval of <3 months among case series utilizing continuous antibiotic therapy (66.7%) compared with those utilizing an antibiotic holiday (27.2%; p < 0.001).\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nThere is no proven superiority of an antibiotic holiday during a 2-stage exchange to treat chronic PJI. Due to the need to extend the duration of the interval between the first and second stages in order to accommodate an antibiotic holiday, patients may be subjected to unnecessary prolongation of their treatment duration without an improvement in outcome.\r\n\r\nLEVEL OF EVIDENCE\r\nTherapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.","PeriodicalId":22625,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery","volume":"132 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Antibiotic Holiday in 2-Stage Exchange for Periprosthetic Joint Infection: A Scoping Review.\",\"authors\":\"Andrew Fraval,Daniel Gould,Mehmet Kursat Yilmaz,Alex Soriano,Javad Parvizi\",\"doi\":\"10.2106/jbjs.24.01275\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND\\r\\nThe use of a 2-stage exchange remains a common management strategy for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). The use of an \\\"antibiotic holiday\\\" before the second stage to confirm the clearance of infection is often employed, but there is little evidence to guide this practice. The aim of this review was to systematically map the literature reporting on the use of an antibiotic holiday as part of a 2-stage revision for chronic PJI and to answer the question: is there a role for an antibiotic holiday in patients undergoing 2-stage exchange arthroplasty for PJI?\\r\\n\\r\\nMETHODS\\r\\nGiven the heterogeneity of the literature on this topic, a Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA)-compliant scoping review was conducted. Two reviewers developed and refined the search strategy and study eligibility criteria and pilot-tested the data charting form prior to data extraction. Data were analyzed descriptively.\\r\\n\\r\\nRESULTS\\r\\nThree databases were screened, with 504 full-text articles retrieved for review after screening 2,579 titles and abstracts. Of these, 243 were included for data charting. Most studies (238 of 243; 97.9%) were case series, and the remaining 5 (2.1%) were cohort studies that incorporated a direct comparison between continuous therapy and an antibiotic holiday. Most case series (202 of 238; 84.9%) utilized an antibiotic holiday. The proportion of patients who experienced treatment failure in the continuous therapy group (271 of 2,074 patients; 13.1%) was lower than that in the antibiotic holiday group (2,843 of 17,329 patients; 16.4%; p < 0.001). There was a greater proportion of studies with a between-stage interval of <3 months among case series utilizing continuous antibiotic therapy (66.7%) compared with those utilizing an antibiotic holiday (27.2%; p < 0.001).\\r\\n\\r\\nCONCLUSIONS\\r\\nThere is no proven superiority of an antibiotic holiday during a 2-stage exchange to treat chronic PJI. Due to the need to extend the duration of the interval between the first and second stages in order to accommodate an antibiotic holiday, patients may be subjected to unnecessary prolongation of their treatment duration without an improvement in outcome.\\r\\n\\r\\nLEVEL OF EVIDENCE\\r\\nTherapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22625,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery\",\"volume\":\"132 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.24.01275\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.24.01275","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:使用两阶段交换仍然是假体周围关节感染(PJI)的常见管理策略。通常在第二阶段之前使用“抗生素假期”来确认感染的清除,但很少有证据指导这种做法。本综述的目的是系统地描绘关于使用抗生素假期作为慢性PJI两期翻修的一部分的文献报道,并回答这个问题:抗生素假期在接受两期置换关节置换术治疗PJI的患者中是否有作用?方法考虑到该主题文献的异质性,进行了符合PRISMA标准的首选报告项目系统评价和荟萃分析(PRISMA)范围审查。两位审稿人制定并完善了搜索策略和研究资格标准,并在数据提取之前对数据图表形式进行了试点测试。对数据进行描述性分析。结果筛选3个数据库,筛选2579篇题目和摘要,共检索到504篇全文文章。其中243个被列入数据图表。大多数研究(243个中的238个;97.9%)为病例系列,其余5项(2.1%)为队列研究,直接比较了持续治疗和抗生素假期。大多数病例系列(238例中的202例;84.9%)使用抗生素假期。持续治疗组出现治疗失败的患者比例(2074例患者中有271例;13.1%)低于抗生素假期组(17,329例患者中2,843例;16.4%;P < 0.001)。在使用持续抗生素治疗的病例系列中,阶段间隔<3个月的研究比例(66.7%)比使用抗生素假期的研究比例(27.2%;P < 0.001)。结论在2期换药治疗慢性PJI中,抗生素假期并没有被证实的优越性。由于需要延长第一阶段和第二阶段之间的间隔时间,以适应抗生素假期,患者可能会遭受不必要的延长治疗时间,而结果却没有改善。证据级别:治疗性IV级。参见《作者说明》获得证据级别的完整描述。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Antibiotic Holiday in 2-Stage Exchange for Periprosthetic Joint Infection: A Scoping Review.
BACKGROUND The use of a 2-stage exchange remains a common management strategy for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). The use of an "antibiotic holiday" before the second stage to confirm the clearance of infection is often employed, but there is little evidence to guide this practice. The aim of this review was to systematically map the literature reporting on the use of an antibiotic holiday as part of a 2-stage revision for chronic PJI and to answer the question: is there a role for an antibiotic holiday in patients undergoing 2-stage exchange arthroplasty for PJI? METHODS Given the heterogeneity of the literature on this topic, a Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA)-compliant scoping review was conducted. Two reviewers developed and refined the search strategy and study eligibility criteria and pilot-tested the data charting form prior to data extraction. Data were analyzed descriptively. RESULTS Three databases were screened, with 504 full-text articles retrieved for review after screening 2,579 titles and abstracts. Of these, 243 were included for data charting. Most studies (238 of 243; 97.9%) were case series, and the remaining 5 (2.1%) were cohort studies that incorporated a direct comparison between continuous therapy and an antibiotic holiday. Most case series (202 of 238; 84.9%) utilized an antibiotic holiday. The proportion of patients who experienced treatment failure in the continuous therapy group (271 of 2,074 patients; 13.1%) was lower than that in the antibiotic holiday group (2,843 of 17,329 patients; 16.4%; p < 0.001). There was a greater proportion of studies with a between-stage interval of <3 months among case series utilizing continuous antibiotic therapy (66.7%) compared with those utilizing an antibiotic holiday (27.2%; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS There is no proven superiority of an antibiotic holiday during a 2-stage exchange to treat chronic PJI. Due to the need to extend the duration of the interval between the first and second stages in order to accommodate an antibiotic holiday, patients may be subjected to unnecessary prolongation of their treatment duration without an improvement in outcome. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信