Philomena Burger, Mina Botros, Zein El-Zein, Amanda Holleran, John Ketz, A Sam Flemister, David Ciufo
{"title":"手术与非手术治疗跟腱断裂的预后对比。","authors":"Philomena Burger, Mina Botros, Zein El-Zein, Amanda Holleran, John Ketz, A Sam Flemister, David Ciufo","doi":"10.1177/10711007251336756","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Achilles tendon rupture is a common injury in the adult population. The role of operative and nonoperative management remains controversial. The purpose of this study is to evaluate and compare patient-reported outcomes using Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) after operative and nonoperative treatment of acute Achilles rupture.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with Achilles ruptures were identified as either undergoing surgical repair or nonoperative functional rehabilitation. The primary outcomes were PROMIS physical function (PF), pain interference (PI), and depression scores. These were routinely collected prospectively during the initial office visit and follow-up appointments. A distribution-based method was used to determine the minimal clinically important difference (MCID), which was ½ SD of each PROMIS domain. These values were further used to calculate the percentage of patients who returned to population mean PROMIS scores at final follow-up. Secondary outcomes included deep vein thrombosis (DVT), wound healing, infections, and reruptures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 216 patients were included (115 nonoperative, 101 operative). Patients treated operatively were younger (35.6 vs 45.1 years, <i>P</i> < .001), with slightly lower BMI (<i>P</i> = .011). Sex distribution among the groups were similar (<i>P</i> = .933). Both treatments improved PROMIS PF, PI, and depression scores. Although there was a trend toward achieving population means in PF earlier in the operative group, the groups equalized over time, with no statistically significant difference between treatment groups for the percentage of patients who were below, at, or above population mean PROMIS values at 6 months and final follow-up. There was no difference in rerupture rates or identified DVTs. However, there were increased wound issues in the operative group (<i>P</i> = .035), with 12.8% symptomatic scarring, 6% infections, 3% delayed healing, and 3% with palpable nodules, compared with 1 case of cellulitis in a nonoperative patient.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In our patients with an Achilles tendon rupture, on average, operative management was not associated with statistically meaningful differences in patient-reported physical function compared with nonoperative treatment. Surgery also comes at the cost of increased wound/complication rates and was associated with modestly slower improvement in pain and depression scores.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level III, retrospective cohort study.</p>","PeriodicalId":94011,"journal":{"name":"Foot & ankle international","volume":" ","pages":"715-722"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PROMIS Outcomes After Operative vs Nonoperative Treatment of Achilles Rupture.\",\"authors\":\"Philomena Burger, Mina Botros, Zein El-Zein, Amanda Holleran, John Ketz, A Sam Flemister, David Ciufo\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10711007251336756\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Achilles tendon rupture is a common injury in the adult population. The role of operative and nonoperative management remains controversial. The purpose of this study is to evaluate and compare patient-reported outcomes using Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) after operative and nonoperative treatment of acute Achilles rupture.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with Achilles ruptures were identified as either undergoing surgical repair or nonoperative functional rehabilitation. The primary outcomes were PROMIS physical function (PF), pain interference (PI), and depression scores. These were routinely collected prospectively during the initial office visit and follow-up appointments. A distribution-based method was used to determine the minimal clinically important difference (MCID), which was ½ SD of each PROMIS domain. These values were further used to calculate the percentage of patients who returned to population mean PROMIS scores at final follow-up. Secondary outcomes included deep vein thrombosis (DVT), wound healing, infections, and reruptures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 216 patients were included (115 nonoperative, 101 operative). Patients treated operatively were younger (35.6 vs 45.1 years, <i>P</i> < .001), with slightly lower BMI (<i>P</i> = .011). Sex distribution among the groups were similar (<i>P</i> = .933). Both treatments improved PROMIS PF, PI, and depression scores. Although there was a trend toward achieving population means in PF earlier in the operative group, the groups equalized over time, with no statistically significant difference between treatment groups for the percentage of patients who were below, at, or above population mean PROMIS values at 6 months and final follow-up. There was no difference in rerupture rates or identified DVTs. However, there were increased wound issues in the operative group (<i>P</i> = .035), with 12.8% symptomatic scarring, 6% infections, 3% delayed healing, and 3% with palpable nodules, compared with 1 case of cellulitis in a nonoperative patient.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In our patients with an Achilles tendon rupture, on average, operative management was not associated with statistically meaningful differences in patient-reported physical function compared with nonoperative treatment. Surgery also comes at the cost of increased wound/complication rates and was associated with modestly slower improvement in pain and depression scores.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level III, retrospective cohort study.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94011,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Foot & ankle international\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"715-722\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Foot & ankle international\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10711007251336756\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foot & ankle international","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10711007251336756","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:跟腱断裂是成人常见的损伤。手术和非手术治疗的作用仍然存在争议。本研究的目的是利用患者报告结果测量信息系统(PROMIS)评估和比较急性跟腱断裂手术和非手术治疗后患者报告的结果。方法:对跟腱断裂患者进行手术修复或非手术功能康复治疗。主要结局是PROMIS身体功能(PF)、疼痛干扰(PI)和抑郁评分。这些是在初次办公室访问和随访预约期间例行收集的。采用基于分布的方法确定最小临床重要差异(MCID),即每个PROMIS结构域的½SD。这些值进一步用于计算最终随访时恢复到人口平均PROMIS评分的患者百分比。次要结果包括深静脉血栓形成(DVT)、伤口愈合、感染和再出血。结果:共纳入216例患者(非手术115例,手术101例)。接受手术治疗的患者较年轻(35.6 vs 45.1岁,P P = 0.011)。各组间性别分布相似(P = .933)。两种治疗方法均改善了PROMIS PF、PI和抑郁评分。虽然在手术组中有较早达到人群平均水平的趋势,但随着时间的推移,各组之间趋于平衡,在6个月和最后随访时,低于、等于或高于人群平均PROMIS值的患者百分比在治疗组之间没有统计学上的显著差异。再破裂率和确定的深静脉血栓没有差异。然而,手术组的伤口问题增加(P = 0.035),有12.8%的症状性瘢痕形成,6%的感染,3%的延迟愈合,3%的可触及结节,而非手术患者中只有1例蜂窝织炎。结论:在我们的跟腱断裂患者中,平均而言,与非手术治疗相比,手术处理与患者报告的身体功能没有统计学意义的差异。手术也会增加伤口/并发症的发生率,并与疼痛和抑郁评分的改善缓慢相关。证据等级:III级,回顾性队列研究。
PROMIS Outcomes After Operative vs Nonoperative Treatment of Achilles Rupture.
Background: Achilles tendon rupture is a common injury in the adult population. The role of operative and nonoperative management remains controversial. The purpose of this study is to evaluate and compare patient-reported outcomes using Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) after operative and nonoperative treatment of acute Achilles rupture.
Methods: Patients with Achilles ruptures were identified as either undergoing surgical repair or nonoperative functional rehabilitation. The primary outcomes were PROMIS physical function (PF), pain interference (PI), and depression scores. These were routinely collected prospectively during the initial office visit and follow-up appointments. A distribution-based method was used to determine the minimal clinically important difference (MCID), which was ½ SD of each PROMIS domain. These values were further used to calculate the percentage of patients who returned to population mean PROMIS scores at final follow-up. Secondary outcomes included deep vein thrombosis (DVT), wound healing, infections, and reruptures.
Results: A total of 216 patients were included (115 nonoperative, 101 operative). Patients treated operatively were younger (35.6 vs 45.1 years, P < .001), with slightly lower BMI (P = .011). Sex distribution among the groups were similar (P = .933). Both treatments improved PROMIS PF, PI, and depression scores. Although there was a trend toward achieving population means in PF earlier in the operative group, the groups equalized over time, with no statistically significant difference between treatment groups for the percentage of patients who were below, at, or above population mean PROMIS values at 6 months and final follow-up. There was no difference in rerupture rates or identified DVTs. However, there were increased wound issues in the operative group (P = .035), with 12.8% symptomatic scarring, 6% infections, 3% delayed healing, and 3% with palpable nodules, compared with 1 case of cellulitis in a nonoperative patient.
Conclusion: In our patients with an Achilles tendon rupture, on average, operative management was not associated with statistically meaningful differences in patient-reported physical function compared with nonoperative treatment. Surgery also comes at the cost of increased wound/complication rates and was associated with modestly slower improvement in pain and depression scores.
Level of evidence: Level III, retrospective cohort study.