一个系统的比较实施策略在三个美国诊所设置,扩大获得自我管理注射避孕。

Jennifer Karlin, Tammy Bennett, Leah Michael, Sally Rafie, Elise D Berlan
{"title":"一个系统的比较实施策略在三个美国诊所设置,扩大获得自我管理注射避孕。","authors":"Jennifer Karlin, Tammy Bennett, Leah Michael, Sally Rafie, Elise D Berlan","doi":"10.1016/j.contraception.2025.110972","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To describe experiences and systematically compare three U.S. clinics that initiated or expanded access to DMPA-SC for self-administration during the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>We used the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) framework to systematically compare three case studies of implementation projects that expanded use of self-administered DMPA-SC in the United States during the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All three settings used multiple implementation strategies and common strategies fell into five main categories including 1) increasing provider awareness about self-administration of DMPA-SC and continuing education for clinical staff, 2) providing patient education and counseling tailored to patients' needs, 3) supporting changes in clinic workflow, 4) addressing insurance coverage and payment, and 5) reducing barriers to filling prescriptions for self-administered DMPA-SC. Ongoing implementation challenges identified include mitigating additional payment barriers for DMPA-SC and increasing access points beyond physical clinical sites.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The implementation strategies described in this study may be generalizable to other settings and help US-based clinics and health care providers meet current recommendations for ensuring access to self-administration of DMPA-SC.</p>","PeriodicalId":93955,"journal":{"name":"Contraception","volume":" ","pages":"110972"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A systematic comparison of implementation strategies at three U.S. clinic settings that expanded access to self-administered injectable contraception.\",\"authors\":\"Jennifer Karlin, Tammy Bennett, Leah Michael, Sally Rafie, Elise D Berlan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.contraception.2025.110972\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To describe experiences and systematically compare three U.S. clinics that initiated or expanded access to DMPA-SC for self-administration during the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>We used the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) framework to systematically compare three case studies of implementation projects that expanded use of self-administered DMPA-SC in the United States during the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All three settings used multiple implementation strategies and common strategies fell into five main categories including 1) increasing provider awareness about self-administration of DMPA-SC and continuing education for clinical staff, 2) providing patient education and counseling tailored to patients' needs, 3) supporting changes in clinic workflow, 4) addressing insurance coverage and payment, and 5) reducing barriers to filling prescriptions for self-administered DMPA-SC. Ongoing implementation challenges identified include mitigating additional payment barriers for DMPA-SC and increasing access points beyond physical clinical sites.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The implementation strategies described in this study may be generalizable to other settings and help US-based clinics and health care providers meet current recommendations for ensuring access to self-administration of DMPA-SC.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93955,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Contraception\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"110972\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Contraception\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2025.110972\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contraception","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2025.110972","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:描述经验并系统比较在COVID-19大流行期间启动或扩大DMPA-SC自我管理的三家美国诊所。研究设计:我们使用实施变革的专家建议(ERIC)框架系统地比较了三个实施项目的案例研究,这些项目在COVID-19大流行期间在美国扩大了自我管理的DMPA-SC的使用。结果:三种设置均采用了多种实施策略,共同策略主要分为五类:1)提高提供者对DMPA-SC自我管理和临床工作人员继续教育的认识;2)根据患者需求提供患者教育和咨询;3)支持临床工作流程的变化;4)解决保险覆盖和支付问题;5)减少自我管理DMPA-SC的处方填写障碍。目前确定的实施挑战包括减轻DMPA-SC的额外支付障碍,增加物理临床站点以外的接入点。结论:本研究中描述的实施策略可以推广到其他环境,并帮助美国诊所和卫生保健提供者满足当前关于确保DMPA-SC自我管理的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A systematic comparison of implementation strategies at three U.S. clinic settings that expanded access to self-administered injectable contraception.

Objectives: To describe experiences and systematically compare three U.S. clinics that initiated or expanded access to DMPA-SC for self-administration during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Study design: We used the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) framework to systematically compare three case studies of implementation projects that expanded use of self-administered DMPA-SC in the United States during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Results: All three settings used multiple implementation strategies and common strategies fell into five main categories including 1) increasing provider awareness about self-administration of DMPA-SC and continuing education for clinical staff, 2) providing patient education and counseling tailored to patients' needs, 3) supporting changes in clinic workflow, 4) addressing insurance coverage and payment, and 5) reducing barriers to filling prescriptions for self-administered DMPA-SC. Ongoing implementation challenges identified include mitigating additional payment barriers for DMPA-SC and increasing access points beyond physical clinical sites.

Conclusion: The implementation strategies described in this study may be generalizable to other settings and help US-based clinics and health care providers meet current recommendations for ensuring access to self-administration of DMPA-SC.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信