在2022年美国蒙大拿州西部野火季节,细颗粒物与家庭血压之间的关系。

Environmental research, health : ERH Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-21 DOI:10.1088/2752-5309/add616
Ethan S Walker, Taylor Stewart, Rajesh Vedanthan, Daniel B Spoon
{"title":"在2022年美国蒙大拿州西部野火季节,细颗粒物与家庭血压之间的关系。","authors":"Ethan S Walker, Taylor Stewart, Rajesh Vedanthan, Daniel B Spoon","doi":"10.1088/2752-5309/add616","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Wildfires continue to increase in size, intensity, and duration. There is growing evidence that wildfire smoke adversely impacts clinical outcomes; however, few studies have assessed the impact of wildfires on household air quality and subclinical cardiovascular health indicators. We measured continuous indoor and outdoor fine particulate matter (PM<sub>2.5</sub>) concentrations from July-October 2022 at 20 residences in the rural, mountainous state of Montana in the United States. We used a combination of satellite-derived smoke plume data from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's Hazard Mapping System and household-level daily mean PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentrations to classify wildfire-impacted days. One participant from each household self-reported in-home blood pressure (BP) on weekly electronic surveys. We used linear mixed-effects regression models to assess associations between air pollution exposures (PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentrations; number of wildfire-impacted days) and systolic BP (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP). Models were adjusted for potential time-variant confounders including temperature, humidity, and self-reported exercise. Compared to survey periods with 0 wildfire days, SBP was 3.83 mmHg higher (95% Confidence Interval [95% CI]: 0.22, 7.44) and DBP was 2.36 mmHg higher (95% CI: -0.06, 4.78) during periods with 4+ wildfire days. Across the entire study period, a 10 <i>µ</i>g m<sup>-3</sup> increase in indoor PM<sub>2.5</sub> was associated with 1.34 mmHg higher SBP (95%CI: 0.39, 2.29) and 0.71 mmHg higher DBP (95% CI: 0.07, 1.35). We observed that wildfire-impacted days and increasing household-level PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentrations are associated with higher in-home BP. Our results support growing literature which indicates that wildfires adversely impact subclinical cardiovascular health. Clinical and public health messaging should emphasize the cardiovascular health impacts of wildfire smoke and educate on exposure-reduction strategies such as indoor air filtration.</p>","PeriodicalId":72938,"journal":{"name":"Environmental research, health : ERH","volume":"3 3","pages":"035002"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12096407/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Associations between fine particulate matter and in-home blood pressure during the 2022 wildfire season in Western Montana, USA.\",\"authors\":\"Ethan S Walker, Taylor Stewart, Rajesh Vedanthan, Daniel B Spoon\",\"doi\":\"10.1088/2752-5309/add616\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Wildfires continue to increase in size, intensity, and duration. There is growing evidence that wildfire smoke adversely impacts clinical outcomes; however, few studies have assessed the impact of wildfires on household air quality and subclinical cardiovascular health indicators. We measured continuous indoor and outdoor fine particulate matter (PM<sub>2.5</sub>) concentrations from July-October 2022 at 20 residences in the rural, mountainous state of Montana in the United States. We used a combination of satellite-derived smoke plume data from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's Hazard Mapping System and household-level daily mean PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentrations to classify wildfire-impacted days. One participant from each household self-reported in-home blood pressure (BP) on weekly electronic surveys. We used linear mixed-effects regression models to assess associations between air pollution exposures (PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentrations; number of wildfire-impacted days) and systolic BP (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP). Models were adjusted for potential time-variant confounders including temperature, humidity, and self-reported exercise. Compared to survey periods with 0 wildfire days, SBP was 3.83 mmHg higher (95% Confidence Interval [95% CI]: 0.22, 7.44) and DBP was 2.36 mmHg higher (95% CI: -0.06, 4.78) during periods with 4+ wildfire days. Across the entire study period, a 10 <i>µ</i>g m<sup>-3</sup> increase in indoor PM<sub>2.5</sub> was associated with 1.34 mmHg higher SBP (95%CI: 0.39, 2.29) and 0.71 mmHg higher DBP (95% CI: 0.07, 1.35). We observed that wildfire-impacted days and increasing household-level PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentrations are associated with higher in-home BP. Our results support growing literature which indicates that wildfires adversely impact subclinical cardiovascular health. Clinical and public health messaging should emphasize the cardiovascular health impacts of wildfire smoke and educate on exposure-reduction strategies such as indoor air filtration.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72938,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental research, health : ERH\",\"volume\":\"3 3\",\"pages\":\"035002\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12096407/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental research, health : ERH\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1088/2752-5309/add616\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental research, health : ERH","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/2752-5309/add616","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

野火的规模、强度和持续时间继续增加。越来越多的证据表明野火烟雾会对临床结果产生不利影响;然而,很少有研究评估野火对家庭空气质量和亚临床心血管健康指标的影响。我们从2022年7月至10月在美国蒙大拿州农村山区的20个住宅中连续测量了室内和室外细颗粒物(PM2.5)浓度。我们结合了美国国家海洋和大气管理局(noaa)的危害测绘系统(Hazard Mapping System)的卫星获取的烟羽数据,以及家家户户的PM2.5日均浓度,对受野火影响的天数进行了分类。每个家庭有一名参与者在每周的电子调查中自我报告家中血压(BP)。我们使用线性混合效应回归模型来评估空气污染暴露(PM2.5浓度;野火影响天数)和收缩压(SBP)和舒张压(DBP)。模型调整了潜在的时变混杂因素,包括温度、湿度和自我报告的锻炼。与0天野火期间相比,4天以上野火期间的收缩压高3.83 mmHg(95%可信区间[95% CI]: 0.22, 7.44), DBP高2.36 mmHg (95% CI: -0.06, 4.78)。在整个研究期间,室内PM2.5每增加10µg m-3,收缩压升高1.34 mmHg (95%CI: 0.39, 2.29),舒张压升高0.71 mmHg (95%CI: 0.07, 1.35)。我们观察到,受野火影响的天数和家庭PM2.5浓度的增加与较高的家庭血压有关。我们的研究结果支持越来越多的文献表明,野火对亚临床心血管健康有不利影响。临床和公共卫生信息应强调野火烟雾对心血管健康的影响,并就室内空气过滤等减少接触策略进行教育。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Associations between fine particulate matter and in-home blood pressure during the 2022 wildfire season in Western Montana, USA.

Wildfires continue to increase in size, intensity, and duration. There is growing evidence that wildfire smoke adversely impacts clinical outcomes; however, few studies have assessed the impact of wildfires on household air quality and subclinical cardiovascular health indicators. We measured continuous indoor and outdoor fine particulate matter (PM2.5) concentrations from July-October 2022 at 20 residences in the rural, mountainous state of Montana in the United States. We used a combination of satellite-derived smoke plume data from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's Hazard Mapping System and household-level daily mean PM2.5 concentrations to classify wildfire-impacted days. One participant from each household self-reported in-home blood pressure (BP) on weekly electronic surveys. We used linear mixed-effects regression models to assess associations between air pollution exposures (PM2.5 concentrations; number of wildfire-impacted days) and systolic BP (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP). Models were adjusted for potential time-variant confounders including temperature, humidity, and self-reported exercise. Compared to survey periods with 0 wildfire days, SBP was 3.83 mmHg higher (95% Confidence Interval [95% CI]: 0.22, 7.44) and DBP was 2.36 mmHg higher (95% CI: -0.06, 4.78) during periods with 4+ wildfire days. Across the entire study period, a 10 µg m-3 increase in indoor PM2.5 was associated with 1.34 mmHg higher SBP (95%CI: 0.39, 2.29) and 0.71 mmHg higher DBP (95% CI: 0.07, 1.35). We observed that wildfire-impacted days and increasing household-level PM2.5 concentrations are associated with higher in-home BP. Our results support growing literature which indicates that wildfires adversely impact subclinical cardiovascular health. Clinical and public health messaging should emphasize the cardiovascular health impacts of wildfire smoke and educate on exposure-reduction strategies such as indoor air filtration.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信