Hari Trivedi MD , Bardia Khosravi MD, MPH, MHPE , Judy Gichoya MD, MS , Laura Benson , Damian Dyckman MD, PhD , James Galt PhD , Brian M. Howard MD , Elias G. Kikano MD , Jean Kunjummen DO , Neil Lall MD , Xiao T. Li MD , Sumir Patel MD , Nabile Safdar MD, MPH , Ninad Salastekar MD, MPH , Colin Segovis MD, PhD , Marly van Assen PhD , Peter Harri MD
{"title":"行动中的人工智能:放射学人工智能委员会有效模型评估和部署的路线图。","authors":"Hari Trivedi MD , Bardia Khosravi MD, MPH, MHPE , Judy Gichoya MD, MS , Laura Benson , Damian Dyckman MD, PhD , James Galt PhD , Brian M. Howard MD , Elias G. Kikano MD , Jean Kunjummen DO , Neil Lall MD , Xiao T. Li MD , Sumir Patel MD , Nabile Safdar MD, MPH , Ninad Salastekar MD, MPH , Colin Segovis MD, PhD , Marly van Assen PhD , Peter Harri MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jacr.2025.05.016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>As the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into radiology workflows continues to evolve, establishing standardized processes for the evaluation and deployment of AI models is crucial to ensure success. This article outlines the creation of a Radiology AI Council at a large academic center and subsequent development of framework in the form of a rubric to formalize the evaluation of radiology AI models and onboard them into clinical workflows. The rubric aims to address the challenges faced during the deployment of AI models, such as real-world model performance, workflow implementation, resource allocation, return on investment, and impact to the broader health system. Using this comprehensive rubric, the council aims to ensure that the process for selecting AI models is both standardized and transparent. This article outlines the steps taken to establish this rubric, its components, and the initial results from evaluation of 13 models over an 8-month period. We emphasize the importance of holistic model evaluation beyond performance metrics, and transparency and objectivity in AI model evaluation, with the goal of improving the efficacy and safety of AI models in radiology.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49044,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American College of Radiology","volume":"22 9","pages":"Pages 1041-1049"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"AI in Action: A Road Map From the Radiology AI Council for Effective Model Evaluation and Deployment\",\"authors\":\"Hari Trivedi MD , Bardia Khosravi MD, MPH, MHPE , Judy Gichoya MD, MS , Laura Benson , Damian Dyckman MD, PhD , James Galt PhD , Brian M. Howard MD , Elias G. Kikano MD , Jean Kunjummen DO , Neil Lall MD , Xiao T. Li MD , Sumir Patel MD , Nabile Safdar MD, MPH , Ninad Salastekar MD, MPH , Colin Segovis MD, PhD , Marly van Assen PhD , Peter Harri MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jacr.2025.05.016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>As the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into radiology workflows continues to evolve, establishing standardized processes for the evaluation and deployment of AI models is crucial to ensure success. This article outlines the creation of a Radiology AI Council at a large academic center and subsequent development of framework in the form of a rubric to formalize the evaluation of radiology AI models and onboard them into clinical workflows. The rubric aims to address the challenges faced during the deployment of AI models, such as real-world model performance, workflow implementation, resource allocation, return on investment, and impact to the broader health system. Using this comprehensive rubric, the council aims to ensure that the process for selecting AI models is both standardized and transparent. This article outlines the steps taken to establish this rubric, its components, and the initial results from evaluation of 13 models over an 8-month period. We emphasize the importance of holistic model evaluation beyond performance metrics, and transparency and objectivity in AI model evaluation, with the goal of improving the efficacy and safety of AI models in radiology.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49044,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American College of Radiology\",\"volume\":\"22 9\",\"pages\":\"Pages 1041-1049\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American College of Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1546144025002996\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American College of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1546144025002996","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
AI in Action: A Road Map From the Radiology AI Council for Effective Model Evaluation and Deployment
As the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into radiology workflows continues to evolve, establishing standardized processes for the evaluation and deployment of AI models is crucial to ensure success. This article outlines the creation of a Radiology AI Council at a large academic center and subsequent development of framework in the form of a rubric to formalize the evaluation of radiology AI models and onboard them into clinical workflows. The rubric aims to address the challenges faced during the deployment of AI models, such as real-world model performance, workflow implementation, resource allocation, return on investment, and impact to the broader health system. Using this comprehensive rubric, the council aims to ensure that the process for selecting AI models is both standardized and transparent. This article outlines the steps taken to establish this rubric, its components, and the initial results from evaluation of 13 models over an 8-month period. We emphasize the importance of holistic model evaluation beyond performance metrics, and transparency and objectivity in AI model evaluation, with the goal of improving the efficacy and safety of AI models in radiology.
期刊介绍:
The official journal of the American College of Radiology, JACR informs its readers of timely, pertinent, and important topics affecting the practice of diagnostic radiologists, interventional radiologists, medical physicists, and radiation oncologists. In so doing, JACR improves their practices and helps optimize their role in the health care system. By providing a forum for informative, well-written articles on health policy, clinical practice, practice management, data science, and education, JACR engages readers in a dialogue that ultimately benefits patient care.