以计算为导向的定性分析来了解不同类型移动个人健康记录的用户体验。

AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium Pub Date : 2025-05-22 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01
Zainab A Balogun, Pronob K Barman, Bianka K Onwumbiko, Tera L Reynolds
{"title":"以计算为导向的定性分析来了解不同类型移动个人健康记录的用户体验。","authors":"Zainab A Balogun, Pronob K Barman, Bianka K Onwumbiko, Tera L Reynolds","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Mobile personal health records (mPHR) are smartphone apps that grant patients portable and continuous access to their medical records, thereby increasing the potential for patients to play an active role in managing their health. An extensive body of literature has focused on understanding user experiences with web-based tethered PHRs (i.e., patient portals) offered by healthcare organizations. However, patients' opinions of smartphone-based PHRs have received less attention. To address this gap, we used a computationally-guided qualitative analysis approach to analyze user reviews of six tethered and four interconnected mPHR apps available on both Google Play and Apple app stores. This approach resulted in identifying dimensions of user experiences related to usability, usefulness, and important features to users. Our findings reveal many similarities in user experiences for HCO-tethered and HCO-independent interconnected PHRs. However, there are some differences in user experiences between the types of PHRs and the different devices and platforms.</p>","PeriodicalId":72180,"journal":{"name":"AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium","volume":"2024 ","pages":"162-171"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12099338/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Computationally-guided Qualitative Analysis to Understand User Experiences with Different Types of Mobile Personal Health Records.\",\"authors\":\"Zainab A Balogun, Pronob K Barman, Bianka K Onwumbiko, Tera L Reynolds\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Mobile personal health records (mPHR) are smartphone apps that grant patients portable and continuous access to their medical records, thereby increasing the potential for patients to play an active role in managing their health. An extensive body of literature has focused on understanding user experiences with web-based tethered PHRs (i.e., patient portals) offered by healthcare organizations. However, patients' opinions of smartphone-based PHRs have received less attention. To address this gap, we used a computationally-guided qualitative analysis approach to analyze user reviews of six tethered and four interconnected mPHR apps available on both Google Play and Apple app stores. This approach resulted in identifying dimensions of user experiences related to usability, usefulness, and important features to users. Our findings reveal many similarities in user experiences for HCO-tethered and HCO-independent interconnected PHRs. However, there are some differences in user experiences between the types of PHRs and the different devices and platforms.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72180,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium\",\"volume\":\"2024 \",\"pages\":\"162-171\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12099338/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

移动个人健康记录(mPHR)是智能手机应用程序,允许患者便携式和连续访问他们的医疗记录,从而增加患者在管理自己的健康方面发挥积极作用的潜力。大量文献关注于理解医疗保健组织提供的基于web的捆绑phrr(即患者门户)的用户体验。然而,患者对基于智能手机的phrr的意见却很少受到关注。为了解决这一差距,我们使用了一种计算导向的定性分析方法来分析b谷歌Play和Apple应用商店中6款捆绑和4款相互连接的mPHR应用的用户评论。这种方法确定了与可用性、有用性和重要功能相关的用户体验维度。我们的研究结果揭示了HCO-tethered和HCO-independent互连phrr的用户体验有许多相似之处。然而,不同类型的phrr以及不同的设备和平台在用户体验上存在一些差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Computationally-guided Qualitative Analysis to Understand User Experiences with Different Types of Mobile Personal Health Records.

Mobile personal health records (mPHR) are smartphone apps that grant patients portable and continuous access to their medical records, thereby increasing the potential for patients to play an active role in managing their health. An extensive body of literature has focused on understanding user experiences with web-based tethered PHRs (i.e., patient portals) offered by healthcare organizations. However, patients' opinions of smartphone-based PHRs have received less attention. To address this gap, we used a computationally-guided qualitative analysis approach to analyze user reviews of six tethered and four interconnected mPHR apps available on both Google Play and Apple app stores. This approach resulted in identifying dimensions of user experiences related to usability, usefulness, and important features to users. Our findings reveal many similarities in user experiences for HCO-tethered and HCO-independent interconnected PHRs. However, there are some differences in user experiences between the types of PHRs and the different devices and platforms.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信