护理本科学生在护理技能训练中对虚拟现实模拟的偏好:一个离散选择实验。

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
DIGITAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2025-05-23 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/20552076251339009
Yanya Chen, Yan He, Xiaochun Zou, Hongya Cai, Hei Hang Edmund Yiu, Wai-Kit Ming
{"title":"护理本科学生在护理技能训练中对虚拟现实模拟的偏好:一个离散选择实验。","authors":"Yanya Chen, Yan He, Xiaochun Zou, Hongya Cai, Hei Hang Edmund Yiu, Wai-Kit Ming","doi":"10.1177/20552076251339009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Nursing students face increasing challenges, making it crucial to explore innovative teaching methods such as virtual reality simulations to enhance skills. This study aimed to assess their preferences for virtual reality simulation in skills training using a discrete choice experiment.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A discrete choice experiment with six attributes (types of virtual reality, interaction, learning contents, collaboration, frequency, and costs for each additional training module) was used. A mixed logit model and latent class analysis were adopted to analyze data using Sawtooth Software and STATA BE 18.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>A total of 518 undergraduate nursing students completed this study. They identified costs for each additional training module, interaction, and types of virtual reality as the three most important attributes. The combination that was most preferred was immersive virtual reality simulation, high-level interaction types, advanced learning contents, mixed learning modules, lower prices, and a practice frequency of once every two weeks. Two classes of students were identified: Class 1 valued the cost for each additional training module, while Class 2 preferred a better immersion experience.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Students' preference for virtual reality simulation depended on some factors, including types of virtual reality, interaction, learning contents, and costs for each additional training module. Nursing educators should take students' preferences into account to ensure that their preferences and needs are addressed as fully as possible.</p>","PeriodicalId":51333,"journal":{"name":"DIGITAL HEALTH","volume":"11 ","pages":"20552076251339009"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12102573/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Undergraduate nursing students' preferences for virtual reality simulations in nursing skills training: A discrete choice experiment.\",\"authors\":\"Yanya Chen, Yan He, Xiaochun Zou, Hongya Cai, Hei Hang Edmund Yiu, Wai-Kit Ming\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/20552076251339009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Nursing students face increasing challenges, making it crucial to explore innovative teaching methods such as virtual reality simulations to enhance skills. This study aimed to assess their preferences for virtual reality simulation in skills training using a discrete choice experiment.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A discrete choice experiment with six attributes (types of virtual reality, interaction, learning contents, collaboration, frequency, and costs for each additional training module) was used. A mixed logit model and latent class analysis were adopted to analyze data using Sawtooth Software and STATA BE 18.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>A total of 518 undergraduate nursing students completed this study. They identified costs for each additional training module, interaction, and types of virtual reality as the three most important attributes. The combination that was most preferred was immersive virtual reality simulation, high-level interaction types, advanced learning contents, mixed learning modules, lower prices, and a practice frequency of once every two weeks. Two classes of students were identified: Class 1 valued the cost for each additional training module, while Class 2 preferred a better immersion experience.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Students' preference for virtual reality simulation depended on some factors, including types of virtual reality, interaction, learning contents, and costs for each additional training module. Nursing educators should take students' preferences into account to ensure that their preferences and needs are addressed as fully as possible.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51333,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"DIGITAL HEALTH\",\"volume\":\"11 \",\"pages\":\"20552076251339009\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12102573/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"DIGITAL HEALTH\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076251339009\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DIGITAL HEALTH","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076251339009","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:护生面临越来越大的挑战,探索虚拟现实模拟等创新教学方法,提高护生技能。本研究旨在通过离散选择实验来评估他们在技能训练中对虚拟现实模拟的偏好。方法:采用具有六个属性(虚拟现实类型、交互、学习内容、协作、频率和每个额外训练模块的成本)的离散选择实验。采用混合logit模型和潜类分析,采用Sawtooth软件和STATA BE 18进行数据分析。结果:共有518名本科护生完成本研究。他们将每个额外的培训模块、交互和虚拟现实类型的成本确定为三个最重要的属性。最受欢迎的组合是沉浸式虚拟现实模拟、高水平的互动类型、先进的学习内容、混合的学习模块、更低的价格和每两周一次的练习频率。我们确定了两类学生:1类看重每个额外培训模块的成本,而2类更喜欢更好的沉浸式体验。结论:学生对虚拟现实仿真的偏好取决于虚拟现实的类型、交互、学习内容以及每个额外训练模块的成本等因素。护理教育工作者应该考虑到学生的偏好,以确保他们的偏好和需求得到尽可能充分的解决。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Undergraduate nursing students' preferences for virtual reality simulations in nursing skills training: A discrete choice experiment.

Objective: Nursing students face increasing challenges, making it crucial to explore innovative teaching methods such as virtual reality simulations to enhance skills. This study aimed to assess their preferences for virtual reality simulation in skills training using a discrete choice experiment.

Method: A discrete choice experiment with six attributes (types of virtual reality, interaction, learning contents, collaboration, frequency, and costs for each additional training module) was used. A mixed logit model and latent class analysis were adopted to analyze data using Sawtooth Software and STATA BE 18.

Result: A total of 518 undergraduate nursing students completed this study. They identified costs for each additional training module, interaction, and types of virtual reality as the three most important attributes. The combination that was most preferred was immersive virtual reality simulation, high-level interaction types, advanced learning contents, mixed learning modules, lower prices, and a practice frequency of once every two weeks. Two classes of students were identified: Class 1 valued the cost for each additional training module, while Class 2 preferred a better immersion experience.

Conclusion: Students' preference for virtual reality simulation depended on some factors, including types of virtual reality, interaction, learning contents, and costs for each additional training module. Nursing educators should take students' preferences into account to ensure that their preferences and needs are addressed as fully as possible.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
DIGITAL HEALTH
DIGITAL HEALTH Multiple-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
7.70%
发文量
302
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信