gpt - 40与ERNIE Bot在中国放射肿瘤学检查中的比较分析。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Weiping Wang, Jingxuan Fu, Yiming Zhang, Ke Hu
{"title":"gpt - 40与ERNIE Bot在中国放射肿瘤学检查中的比较分析。","authors":"Weiping Wang, Jingxuan Fu, Yiming Zhang, Ke Hu","doi":"10.1007/s13187-025-02652-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly utilized in medical education and practice, yet their application in niche fields such as radiation oncology remains underexplored. This study evaluates and compares the performance of OpenAI's GPT-4o and Baidu's ERNIE Bot in a Chinese-language radiation oncology examination. We employed the Chinese National Health Professional Technical Qualification Examination (Intermediate Level) for Radiation Oncology, using a question bank of 1128 items across four sections: Basic Knowledge, Relevant Knowledge, Specialized Knowledge, and Practice Competence. A passing score required an accuracy rate of 60% or higher in all sections. The models' responses were assessed for accuracy against standard answers, with key metrics including overall accuracy, section-specific performance, case analysis performance, and accuracy consensus between the models. The overall accuracy rates were 79.3% for GPT-4o and 76.9% for ERNIE Bot (p = 0.154). Across the four sections, GPT-4o achieved accuracy rates of 82.1%, 84.6%, 78.6%, and 60.9%, respectively, while ERNIE Bot achieved 81.6%, 73.9%, 77.9%, and 69.0%. In the Relevant Knowledge section, GPT-4o achieved significantly higher accuracy (p = 0.002), while no significant differences were found in the other three sections. Across various question types-including single-choice, multiple-answer, case analysis, non-case analysis, and different content areas of case analysis-both models exhibited satisfied accuracy, and ERNIE Bot achieved accuracy rates that were comparable to GPT-4o. The accuracy consensus between the two models was 84.5%, significantly exceeding the individual accuracy rates of GPT-4o (p = 0.003) and ERNIE Bot (p < 0.001). Both GPT-4o and ERNIE Bot successfully passed the highly specialized Chinese-language medical examination in radiation oncology and demonstrated comparable performance. This study provides valuable insights into the application of LLMs in Chinese medical education. These findings support the integration of LLMs in medical education and training within specialized, non-English-speaking contexts.</p>","PeriodicalId":50246,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparative Analysis of GPT-4o and ERNIE Bot in a Chinese Radiation Oncology Exam.\",\"authors\":\"Weiping Wang, Jingxuan Fu, Yiming Zhang, Ke Hu\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13187-025-02652-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly utilized in medical education and practice, yet their application in niche fields such as radiation oncology remains underexplored. This study evaluates and compares the performance of OpenAI's GPT-4o and Baidu's ERNIE Bot in a Chinese-language radiation oncology examination. We employed the Chinese National Health Professional Technical Qualification Examination (Intermediate Level) for Radiation Oncology, using a question bank of 1128 items across four sections: Basic Knowledge, Relevant Knowledge, Specialized Knowledge, and Practice Competence. A passing score required an accuracy rate of 60% or higher in all sections. The models' responses were assessed for accuracy against standard answers, with key metrics including overall accuracy, section-specific performance, case analysis performance, and accuracy consensus between the models. The overall accuracy rates were 79.3% for GPT-4o and 76.9% for ERNIE Bot (p = 0.154). Across the four sections, GPT-4o achieved accuracy rates of 82.1%, 84.6%, 78.6%, and 60.9%, respectively, while ERNIE Bot achieved 81.6%, 73.9%, 77.9%, and 69.0%. In the Relevant Knowledge section, GPT-4o achieved significantly higher accuracy (p = 0.002), while no significant differences were found in the other three sections. Across various question types-including single-choice, multiple-answer, case analysis, non-case analysis, and different content areas of case analysis-both models exhibited satisfied accuracy, and ERNIE Bot achieved accuracy rates that were comparable to GPT-4o. The accuracy consensus between the two models was 84.5%, significantly exceeding the individual accuracy rates of GPT-4o (p = 0.003) and ERNIE Bot (p < 0.001). Both GPT-4o and ERNIE Bot successfully passed the highly specialized Chinese-language medical examination in radiation oncology and demonstrated comparable performance. This study provides valuable insights into the application of LLMs in Chinese medical education. These findings support the integration of LLMs in medical education and training within specialized, non-English-speaking contexts.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50246,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cancer Education\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cancer Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-025-02652-9\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cancer Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-025-02652-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

大型语言模型(LLMs)越来越多地用于医学教育和实践,但它们在放射肿瘤学等利基领域的应用仍未得到充分探索。本研究评估和比较OpenAI的gpt - 40和百度的ERNIE Bot在中文放射肿瘤学检查中的表现。我们采用中国国家卫生专业技术资格考试(中级)放射肿瘤学,使用1128题的题库分为四个部分:基本知识,相关知识,专业知识和实践能力。通过分数要求所有部分的准确率达到60%或更高。根据标准答案评估模型回答的准确性,关键指标包括总体准确性、特定部分的性能、案例分析性能和模型之间的准确性一致性。gpt - 40和ERNIE Bot的总体准确率分别为79.3%和76.9% (p = 0.154)。在四个部分中,gpt - 40的准确率分别为82.1%、84.6%、78.6%和60.9%,而ERNIE Bot的准确率分别为81.6%、73.9%、77.9%和69.0%。在相关知识部分,gpt - 40的准确率显著高于其他三个部分(p = 0.002),而其他三个部分的准确率无显著差异。在各种问题类型中——包括单选题、多选题、案例分析、非案例分析和案例分析的不同内容领域——两种模型都表现出令人满意的准确性,ERNIE Bot达到了与gpt - 40相当的准确率。两种模型的准确率一致性为84.5%,显著超过gpt - 40 (p = 0.003)和ERNIE Bot (p = 0.003)的个体准确率
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Comparative Analysis of GPT-4o and ERNIE Bot in a Chinese Radiation Oncology Exam.

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly utilized in medical education and practice, yet their application in niche fields such as radiation oncology remains underexplored. This study evaluates and compares the performance of OpenAI's GPT-4o and Baidu's ERNIE Bot in a Chinese-language radiation oncology examination. We employed the Chinese National Health Professional Technical Qualification Examination (Intermediate Level) for Radiation Oncology, using a question bank of 1128 items across four sections: Basic Knowledge, Relevant Knowledge, Specialized Knowledge, and Practice Competence. A passing score required an accuracy rate of 60% or higher in all sections. The models' responses were assessed for accuracy against standard answers, with key metrics including overall accuracy, section-specific performance, case analysis performance, and accuracy consensus between the models. The overall accuracy rates were 79.3% for GPT-4o and 76.9% for ERNIE Bot (p = 0.154). Across the four sections, GPT-4o achieved accuracy rates of 82.1%, 84.6%, 78.6%, and 60.9%, respectively, while ERNIE Bot achieved 81.6%, 73.9%, 77.9%, and 69.0%. In the Relevant Knowledge section, GPT-4o achieved significantly higher accuracy (p = 0.002), while no significant differences were found in the other three sections. Across various question types-including single-choice, multiple-answer, case analysis, non-case analysis, and different content areas of case analysis-both models exhibited satisfied accuracy, and ERNIE Bot achieved accuracy rates that were comparable to GPT-4o. The accuracy consensus between the two models was 84.5%, significantly exceeding the individual accuracy rates of GPT-4o (p = 0.003) and ERNIE Bot (p < 0.001). Both GPT-4o and ERNIE Bot successfully passed the highly specialized Chinese-language medical examination in radiation oncology and demonstrated comparable performance. This study provides valuable insights into the application of LLMs in Chinese medical education. These findings support the integration of LLMs in medical education and training within specialized, non-English-speaking contexts.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Cancer Education
Journal of Cancer Education 医学-医学:信息
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
6.20%
发文量
122
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cancer Education, the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education (AACE) and the European Association for Cancer Education (EACE), is an international, quarterly journal dedicated to the publication of original contributions dealing with the varied aspects of cancer education for physicians, dentists, nurses, students, social workers and other allied health professionals, patients, the general public, and anyone interested in effective education about cancer related issues. Articles featured include reports of original results of educational research, as well as discussions of current problems and techniques in cancer education. Manuscripts are welcome on such subjects as educational methods, instruments, and program evaluation. Suitable topics include teaching of basic science aspects of cancer; the assessment of attitudes toward cancer patient management; the teaching of diagnostic skills relevant to cancer; the evaluation of undergraduate, postgraduate, or continuing education programs; and articles about all aspects of cancer education from prevention to palliative care. We encourage contributions to a special column called Reflections; these articles should relate to the human aspects of dealing with cancer, cancer patients, and their families and finding meaning and support in these efforts. Letters to the Editor (600 words or less) dealing with published articles or matters of current interest are also invited. Also featured are commentary; book and media reviews; and announcements of educational programs, fellowships, and grants. Articles should be limited to no more than ten double-spaced typed pages, and there should be no more than three tables or figures and 25 references. We also encourage brief reports of five typewritten pages or less, with no more than one figure or table and 15 references.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信