{"title":"胶原酶溶组织梭菌注射与有限筋膜切除术治疗Dupuytren病的介入后早期临床意义","authors":"Rémy Liechti, Julia Bernhard, Dominique Nellie Merky, Damian Sutter, Esther Vögelin","doi":"10.1016/j.jham.2025.100268","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study compared Collagenase Clostridium Histolyticum (CCH) injection and limited fasciectomy (LF) in terms of early post-interventional soft tissue conditions and patient burden, evaluated by visit frequency to surgeons and hand therapists, complications, and reintervention rates.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Consecutive patients undergoing CCH injection or LF as first-line treatment for Dupuytren's disease over 15 years were assessed. Propensity score matching minimized selection bias. The primary outcome was the assessment of early post-interventional (between 2 and 8 weeks) soft tissue condition using a novel Soft Tissue Score with points assigned for documented swelling, hyperemia, induration, and tenderness. Secondary outcomes included the number of surgeon and hand therapy visits, as well as the complication and reintervention rates in a subgroup of patients followed for at least 4 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After propensity score matching, two treatment groups of 26 patients each were formed (CCH vs. LF group). There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics and correction of flexion contracture between the two treatment groups. The early postinterventional Soft Tissue Score was significantly worse in the LF group than in the CCH group (mean 1.35 vs. 0.65 points, MD 0.7, 95 % CI [0.2, 1.2], p = 0.022). The number of surgeon and hand therapy visits was significantly higher in the LF group (mean 4.7 vs. 1.9 visits, MD 2.8, 95 % CI [1.8, 3.8], p < 0.001 and mean 10.5 vs. 4.3 visits, MD 6.2, 95 % CI [0.7, 11.7], p = 0.036, respectively). The rate of mild and severe complications was comparable in both groups. While the reintervention rate was significantly higher in the CCH group, the occurrence of multiple reinterventions was comparable.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of this study suggest that CCH injections lead to less complicated wound healing requiring less intensive surgeon and hand therapy aftercare than LF. CCH represents a valuable addition to Dupuytren's disease treatment, allowing for repeated use in severe, complex, or recurrent cases without increasing procedure-related risks while offering versatility for combination with minimally invasive surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":45368,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand and Microsurgery","volume":"17 4","pages":"100268"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12098130/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Early postinterventional clinical implications of Collagenase Clostridium Histolyticum injection versus limited fasciectomy for Dupuytren's disease.\",\"authors\":\"Rémy Liechti, Julia Bernhard, Dominique Nellie Merky, Damian Sutter, Esther Vögelin\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jham.2025.100268\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study compared Collagenase Clostridium Histolyticum (CCH) injection and limited fasciectomy (LF) in terms of early post-interventional soft tissue conditions and patient burden, evaluated by visit frequency to surgeons and hand therapists, complications, and reintervention rates.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Consecutive patients undergoing CCH injection or LF as first-line treatment for Dupuytren's disease over 15 years were assessed. Propensity score matching minimized selection bias. The primary outcome was the assessment of early post-interventional (between 2 and 8 weeks) soft tissue condition using a novel Soft Tissue Score with points assigned for documented swelling, hyperemia, induration, and tenderness. Secondary outcomes included the number of surgeon and hand therapy visits, as well as the complication and reintervention rates in a subgroup of patients followed for at least 4 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After propensity score matching, two treatment groups of 26 patients each were formed (CCH vs. LF group). There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics and correction of flexion contracture between the two treatment groups. The early postinterventional Soft Tissue Score was significantly worse in the LF group than in the CCH group (mean 1.35 vs. 0.65 points, MD 0.7, 95 % CI [0.2, 1.2], p = 0.022). The number of surgeon and hand therapy visits was significantly higher in the LF group (mean 4.7 vs. 1.9 visits, MD 2.8, 95 % CI [1.8, 3.8], p < 0.001 and mean 10.5 vs. 4.3 visits, MD 6.2, 95 % CI [0.7, 11.7], p = 0.036, respectively). The rate of mild and severe complications was comparable in both groups. While the reintervention rate was significantly higher in the CCH group, the occurrence of multiple reinterventions was comparable.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of this study suggest that CCH injections lead to less complicated wound healing requiring less intensive surgeon and hand therapy aftercare than LF. CCH represents a valuable addition to Dupuytren's disease treatment, allowing for repeated use in severe, complex, or recurrent cases without increasing procedure-related risks while offering versatility for combination with minimally invasive surgery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45368,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Hand and Microsurgery\",\"volume\":\"17 4\",\"pages\":\"100268\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12098130/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Hand and Microsurgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jham.2025.100268\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hand and Microsurgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jham.2025.100268","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:本研究比较胶原酶溶组织梭菌(CCH)注射和有限筋膜切除术(LF)在介入后早期软组织状况和患者负担方面的差异,通过外科医生和手部治疗师的就诊频率、并发症和再干预率进行评估。材料和方法:对连续15年接受CCH注射或LF作为一线治疗Dupuytren病的患者进行评估。倾向得分匹配最小化选择偏差。主要结局是评估介入后早期(2 - 8周)的软组织状况,采用一种新的软组织评分方法,对记录的肿胀、充血、硬化和压痛进行评分。次要结果包括外科医生和手部治疗就诊次数,以及随访至少4个月的患者亚组的并发症和再干预率。结果:经倾向评分匹配后,分为CCH组和LF组,每组26例。两个治疗组在基线特征和屈曲挛缩矫正方面无显著差异。LF组介入后早期软组织评分明显低于CCH组(平均1.35分比0.65分,MD 0.7, 95% CI [0.2, 1.2], p = 0.022)。LF组的外科手术和手部治疗就诊次数显著高于LF组(平均4.7次vs. 1.9次,MD为2.8次,95% CI [1.8, 3.8], p)。结论:本研究结果表明,与LF组相比,注射CCH可减少复杂的伤口愈合,需要较少的外科手术和手部治疗后护理。CCH是Dupuytren病治疗的一个有价值的补充,允许在严重、复杂或复发的病例中重复使用,而不会增加手术相关的风险,同时提供与微创手术相结合的多功能性。
Early postinterventional clinical implications of Collagenase Clostridium Histolyticum injection versus limited fasciectomy for Dupuytren's disease.
Objectives: This study compared Collagenase Clostridium Histolyticum (CCH) injection and limited fasciectomy (LF) in terms of early post-interventional soft tissue conditions and patient burden, evaluated by visit frequency to surgeons and hand therapists, complications, and reintervention rates.
Materials and methods: Consecutive patients undergoing CCH injection or LF as first-line treatment for Dupuytren's disease over 15 years were assessed. Propensity score matching minimized selection bias. The primary outcome was the assessment of early post-interventional (between 2 and 8 weeks) soft tissue condition using a novel Soft Tissue Score with points assigned for documented swelling, hyperemia, induration, and tenderness. Secondary outcomes included the number of surgeon and hand therapy visits, as well as the complication and reintervention rates in a subgroup of patients followed for at least 4 months.
Results: After propensity score matching, two treatment groups of 26 patients each were formed (CCH vs. LF group). There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics and correction of flexion contracture between the two treatment groups. The early postinterventional Soft Tissue Score was significantly worse in the LF group than in the CCH group (mean 1.35 vs. 0.65 points, MD 0.7, 95 % CI [0.2, 1.2], p = 0.022). The number of surgeon and hand therapy visits was significantly higher in the LF group (mean 4.7 vs. 1.9 visits, MD 2.8, 95 % CI [1.8, 3.8], p < 0.001 and mean 10.5 vs. 4.3 visits, MD 6.2, 95 % CI [0.7, 11.7], p = 0.036, respectively). The rate of mild and severe complications was comparable in both groups. While the reintervention rate was significantly higher in the CCH group, the occurrence of multiple reinterventions was comparable.
Conclusion: The results of this study suggest that CCH injections lead to less complicated wound healing requiring less intensive surgeon and hand therapy aftercare than LF. CCH represents a valuable addition to Dupuytren's disease treatment, allowing for repeated use in severe, complex, or recurrent cases without increasing procedure-related risks while offering versatility for combination with minimally invasive surgery.