{"title":"利用光容积脉搏波和人体测量数据进行高血压分类的7种机器学习模型比较。","authors":"Alessandro Gentilin","doi":"10.1080/03091902.2025.2506419","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study presents an algorithm for classifying individuals into four hypertension categories (healthy, prehypertension, Stage 1, and Stage 2) using indices computed from photoplethysmographic (PPG) and anthropometric data. The dataset includes 219 individuals (115 women, 104 men, ages 21-86), with resting PPG signals, body mass index (BMI), age, weight, height, and resting heart rate. Key features (PPGAI, Ab, and Ad indices) were computed from the PPG signal. After dimensionality reduction through stepwise linear regression, the most informative predictors of hypertensive stages were identified for model training. Seven machine learning models, including Support Vector Machine (SVM), K-Nearest Neighbours, Logistic Regression, Random Forest, Naive Bayes, Linear Discriminant Analysis, and Quadratic Discriminant Analysis, were evaluated using leave-one-out cross-validation and the most accurate one was selected for final classification. The Linear SVM showed the best performance, correctly classifying 71.3%, 67.1%, 38.2%, and 55% of healthy, prehypertensive, Stage 1, and Stage 2 subjects, respectively. However, in a preliminary screening scenario aimed at prompting clinical follow-up for positive cases, the algorithm flagged 76.5% of prehypertensive, 97.1% of Stage 1, and 100% of Stage 2 individuals as belonging to one of the three hypertensive categories. Nonetheless, additional training data are needed to improve the model's accuracy.</p>","PeriodicalId":39637,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Engineering and Technology","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of seven machine learning models in hypertension classification using photoplethysmographic and anthropometric data.\",\"authors\":\"Alessandro Gentilin\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/03091902.2025.2506419\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study presents an algorithm for classifying individuals into four hypertension categories (healthy, prehypertension, Stage 1, and Stage 2) using indices computed from photoplethysmographic (PPG) and anthropometric data. The dataset includes 219 individuals (115 women, 104 men, ages 21-86), with resting PPG signals, body mass index (BMI), age, weight, height, and resting heart rate. Key features (PPGAI, Ab, and Ad indices) were computed from the PPG signal. After dimensionality reduction through stepwise linear regression, the most informative predictors of hypertensive stages were identified for model training. Seven machine learning models, including Support Vector Machine (SVM), K-Nearest Neighbours, Logistic Regression, Random Forest, Naive Bayes, Linear Discriminant Analysis, and Quadratic Discriminant Analysis, were evaluated using leave-one-out cross-validation and the most accurate one was selected for final classification. The Linear SVM showed the best performance, correctly classifying 71.3%, 67.1%, 38.2%, and 55% of healthy, prehypertensive, Stage 1, and Stage 2 subjects, respectively. However, in a preliminary screening scenario aimed at prompting clinical follow-up for positive cases, the algorithm flagged 76.5% of prehypertensive, 97.1% of Stage 1, and 100% of Stage 2 individuals as belonging to one of the three hypertensive categories. Nonetheless, additional training data are needed to improve the model's accuracy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39637,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medical Engineering and Technology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medical Engineering and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/03091902.2025.2506419\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Engineering\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Engineering and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03091902.2025.2506419","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparison of seven machine learning models in hypertension classification using photoplethysmographic and anthropometric data.
This study presents an algorithm for classifying individuals into four hypertension categories (healthy, prehypertension, Stage 1, and Stage 2) using indices computed from photoplethysmographic (PPG) and anthropometric data. The dataset includes 219 individuals (115 women, 104 men, ages 21-86), with resting PPG signals, body mass index (BMI), age, weight, height, and resting heart rate. Key features (PPGAI, Ab, and Ad indices) were computed from the PPG signal. After dimensionality reduction through stepwise linear regression, the most informative predictors of hypertensive stages were identified for model training. Seven machine learning models, including Support Vector Machine (SVM), K-Nearest Neighbours, Logistic Regression, Random Forest, Naive Bayes, Linear Discriminant Analysis, and Quadratic Discriminant Analysis, were evaluated using leave-one-out cross-validation and the most accurate one was selected for final classification. The Linear SVM showed the best performance, correctly classifying 71.3%, 67.1%, 38.2%, and 55% of healthy, prehypertensive, Stage 1, and Stage 2 subjects, respectively. However, in a preliminary screening scenario aimed at prompting clinical follow-up for positive cases, the algorithm flagged 76.5% of prehypertensive, 97.1% of Stage 1, and 100% of Stage 2 individuals as belonging to one of the three hypertensive categories. Nonetheless, additional training data are needed to improve the model's accuracy.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Medical Engineering & Technology is an international, independent, multidisciplinary, bimonthly journal promoting an understanding of the physiological processes underlying disease processes and the appropriate application of technology. Features include authoritative review papers, the reporting of original research, and evaluation reports on new and existing techniques and devices. Each issue of the journal contains a comprehensive information service which provides news relevant to the world of medical technology, details of new products, book reviews, and selected contents of related journals.