人为因素与循证医疗保健设计的交叉:一个概念框架。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Shan Jiang, Angela Mazzi, Kirsten Miller, Laurie Wolf, Yuhao Peng, Harsh Sanghavi, Emmanuel Tetteh, Michael Schwartz, Megan McCray, Amy Graske, Swati Goel, Kristen Webster
{"title":"人为因素与循证医疗保健设计的交叉:一个概念框架。","authors":"Shan Jiang, Angela Mazzi, Kirsten Miller, Laurie Wolf, Yuhao Peng, Harsh Sanghavi, Emmanuel Tetteh, Michael Schwartz, Megan McCray, Amy Graske, Swati Goel, Kristen Webster","doi":"10.1177/19375867251332618","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The work of Human Factors and Ergonomics (HFE) engineers and healthcare architects may overlap when it comes to designing the physical environments of healthcare facilities. Both disciplines are tasked with improving healthcare efficiency, promoting experience and safety, and reducing medical errors. Both disciplines adopt evidence-based and human-centered approaches in the design and evaluation of their work. However, it remains unclear to healthcare design professionals why, when, and how to incorporate HFE engineers' expertise into the architectural design project.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This opinion paper aims to reintroduce HFE to healthcare design by revisiting the core concepts, comparing essential approaches, and explaining the benefits of integrating HFE expertise into the evidence-based design (EBD) of healthcare projects.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Literature review and case studies have demonstrated that simulation and mock-ups, as effective tools, should be integrated into the design and prototyping phases; therefore, they provide feedback to adjust the design concepts and inform design decisions with the engagement of HFE perspectives.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A conceptual framework for the HFE-integrated EBD process was proposed to facilitate the evaluation and improvement studies for healthcare design.</p>","PeriodicalId":47306,"journal":{"name":"Herd-Health Environments Research & Design Journal","volume":" ","pages":"19375867251332618"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Intersection of Human Factors and Evidence-Based Healthcare Design: A Conceptual Framework.\",\"authors\":\"Shan Jiang, Angela Mazzi, Kirsten Miller, Laurie Wolf, Yuhao Peng, Harsh Sanghavi, Emmanuel Tetteh, Michael Schwartz, Megan McCray, Amy Graske, Swati Goel, Kristen Webster\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/19375867251332618\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The work of Human Factors and Ergonomics (HFE) engineers and healthcare architects may overlap when it comes to designing the physical environments of healthcare facilities. Both disciplines are tasked with improving healthcare efficiency, promoting experience and safety, and reducing medical errors. Both disciplines adopt evidence-based and human-centered approaches in the design and evaluation of their work. However, it remains unclear to healthcare design professionals why, when, and how to incorporate HFE engineers' expertise into the architectural design project.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This opinion paper aims to reintroduce HFE to healthcare design by revisiting the core concepts, comparing essential approaches, and explaining the benefits of integrating HFE expertise into the evidence-based design (EBD) of healthcare projects.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Literature review and case studies have demonstrated that simulation and mock-ups, as effective tools, should be integrated into the design and prototyping phases; therefore, they provide feedback to adjust the design concepts and inform design decisions with the engagement of HFE perspectives.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A conceptual framework for the HFE-integrated EBD process was proposed to facilitate the evaluation and improvement studies for healthcare design.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47306,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Herd-Health Environments Research & Design Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"19375867251332618\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Herd-Health Environments Research & Design Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/19375867251332618\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Herd-Health Environments Research & Design Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19375867251332618","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:当涉及到设计医疗设施的物理环境时,人类因素和人体工程学(HFE)工程师和医疗保健架构师的工作可能会重叠。这两个学科的任务都是提高医疗效率,促进经验和安全性,减少医疗差错。这两个学科都采用基于证据和以人为中心的方法来设计和评估他们的工作。然而,医疗保健设计专业人员仍然不清楚为什么,何时以及如何将HFE工程师的专业知识纳入建筑设计项目。目的:本文旨在通过重新审视核心概念,比较基本方法,并解释将HFE专业知识整合到医疗保健项目的循证设计(EBD)中的好处,将HFE重新引入医疗保健设计。方法:文献回顾和案例研究表明,仿真和模型作为有效的工具,应该集成到设计和原型阶段;因此,他们提供反馈来调整设计概念,并根据HFE的观点为设计决策提供信息。结果:提出了一个hfe集成EBD过程的概念框架,以促进医疗保健设计的评估和改进研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Intersection of Human Factors and Evidence-Based Healthcare Design: A Conceptual Framework.

Background: The work of Human Factors and Ergonomics (HFE) engineers and healthcare architects may overlap when it comes to designing the physical environments of healthcare facilities. Both disciplines are tasked with improving healthcare efficiency, promoting experience and safety, and reducing medical errors. Both disciplines adopt evidence-based and human-centered approaches in the design and evaluation of their work. However, it remains unclear to healthcare design professionals why, when, and how to incorporate HFE engineers' expertise into the architectural design project.

Objectives: This opinion paper aims to reintroduce HFE to healthcare design by revisiting the core concepts, comparing essential approaches, and explaining the benefits of integrating HFE expertise into the evidence-based design (EBD) of healthcare projects.

Methods: Literature review and case studies have demonstrated that simulation and mock-ups, as effective tools, should be integrated into the design and prototyping phases; therefore, they provide feedback to adjust the design concepts and inform design decisions with the engagement of HFE perspectives.

Results: A conceptual framework for the HFE-integrated EBD process was proposed to facilitate the evaluation and improvement studies for healthcare design.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Herd-Health Environments Research & Design Journal
Herd-Health Environments Research & Design Journal PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
22.70%
发文量
82
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信