牢记最终目的:审查美国FDA对提交材料的检查,包括真实世界数据。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q4 MEDICAL INFORMATICS
Cheryl Grandinetti, Donna R Rivera, Lee Pai-Scherf, Anna Choe, Paul G Kluetz, Stefanie Kraus, Gabriel K Innes, Kassa Ayalew
{"title":"牢记最终目的:审查美国FDA对提交材料的检查,包括真实世界数据。","authors":"Cheryl Grandinetti, Donna R Rivera, Lee Pai-Scherf, Anna Choe, Paul G Kluetz, Stefanie Kraus, Gabriel K Innes, Kassa Ayalew","doi":"10.1007/s43441-025-00791-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The increasing use of real-world data (RWD) to generate real-world evidence (RWE) presents unique opportunities and challenges for drug development and regulatory decision-making, particularly in the area of good clinical practice inspections. FDA typically focuses their application review-based inspections on pivotal studies that generate evidence submitted to support new drug and biological product applications. This focus applies regardless of the data sources used in those studies. In this article, we discuss the fundamental role of good clinical practice inspections in verifying the quality, integrity, and reliability of RWD used in regulatory submissions. Through case examples, we highlight specific challenges related to accessing RWD source records, assessing data quality, and evaluating processes for data curation, transformation, and analysis. Our experience underscores the importance of early engagement with regulatory agencies as well as the implementation of robust quality management practices throughout the study lifecycle. As RWD continues to shape the regulatory landscape, these case examples provide insights in navigating the complexities associated with submissions utilizing RWE for drug approval.</p>","PeriodicalId":23084,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science","volume":" ","pages":"956-962"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12446128/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Keeping the End in Mind: Reviewing U.S. FDA Inspections of Submissions including Real-World Data.\",\"authors\":\"Cheryl Grandinetti, Donna R Rivera, Lee Pai-Scherf, Anna Choe, Paul G Kluetz, Stefanie Kraus, Gabriel K Innes, Kassa Ayalew\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s43441-025-00791-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The increasing use of real-world data (RWD) to generate real-world evidence (RWE) presents unique opportunities and challenges for drug development and regulatory decision-making, particularly in the area of good clinical practice inspections. FDA typically focuses their application review-based inspections on pivotal studies that generate evidence submitted to support new drug and biological product applications. This focus applies regardless of the data sources used in those studies. In this article, we discuss the fundamental role of good clinical practice inspections in verifying the quality, integrity, and reliability of RWD used in regulatory submissions. Through case examples, we highlight specific challenges related to accessing RWD source records, assessing data quality, and evaluating processes for data curation, transformation, and analysis. Our experience underscores the importance of early engagement with regulatory agencies as well as the implementation of robust quality management practices throughout the study lifecycle. As RWD continues to shape the regulatory landscape, these case examples provide insights in navigating the complexities associated with submissions utilizing RWE for drug approval.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23084,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"956-962\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12446128/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43441-025-00791-1\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/24 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL INFORMATICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43441-025-00791-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

越来越多地使用真实世界数据(RWD)来生成真实世界证据(RWE),为药物开发和监管决策提供了独特的机遇和挑战,特别是在良好临床实践检查领域。FDA通常将其基于申请审查的检查重点放在关键研究上,这些研究产生了支持新药和生物制品申请的证据。无论这些研究中使用的数据来源如何,这一重点都适用。在本文中,我们讨论了良好临床实践检查在验证监管提交中使用的RWD的质量、完整性和可靠性方面的基本作用。通过案例,我们强调了与访问RWD源记录、评估数据质量以及评估数据管理、转换和分析过程相关的具体挑战。我们的经验强调了早期参与监管机构的重要性,以及在整个研究生命周期中实施健壮的质量管理实践的重要性。随着RWD继续塑造监管格局,这些案例示例提供了在利用RWE进行药物批准提交相关的复杂性方面的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Keeping the End in Mind: Reviewing U.S. FDA Inspections of Submissions including Real-World Data.

Keeping the End in Mind: Reviewing U.S. FDA Inspections of Submissions including Real-World Data.

The increasing use of real-world data (RWD) to generate real-world evidence (RWE) presents unique opportunities and challenges for drug development and regulatory decision-making, particularly in the area of good clinical practice inspections. FDA typically focuses their application review-based inspections on pivotal studies that generate evidence submitted to support new drug and biological product applications. This focus applies regardless of the data sources used in those studies. In this article, we discuss the fundamental role of good clinical practice inspections in verifying the quality, integrity, and reliability of RWD used in regulatory submissions. Through case examples, we highlight specific challenges related to accessing RWD source records, assessing data quality, and evaluating processes for data curation, transformation, and analysis. Our experience underscores the importance of early engagement with regulatory agencies as well as the implementation of robust quality management practices throughout the study lifecycle. As RWD continues to shape the regulatory landscape, these case examples provide insights in navigating the complexities associated with submissions utilizing RWE for drug approval.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science
Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science MEDICAL INFORMATICS-PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
13.30%
发文量
127
期刊介绍: Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science (TIRS) is the official scientific journal of DIA that strives to advance medical product discovery, development, regulation, and use through the publication of peer-reviewed original and review articles, commentaries, and letters to the editor across the spectrum of converting biomedical science into practical solutions to advance human health. The focus areas of the journal are as follows: Biostatistics Clinical Trials Product Development and Innovation Global Perspectives Policy Regulatory Science Product Safety Special Populations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信