可生物降解内支架与无支架治疗胰十二指肠切除术后胰瘘风险增加的患者:单中心倾向评分匹配分析

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Michele Mazzola, Andrea Zironda, Alessandro Giani, Carlotta Bellomo, Davide Paolo Bernasconi, Pietro Calcagno, Michele Paterno, Giovanni Ferrari
{"title":"可生物降解内支架与无支架治疗胰十二指肠切除术后胰瘘风险增加的患者:单中心倾向评分匹配分析","authors":"Michele Mazzola, Andrea Zironda, Alessandro Giani, Carlotta Bellomo, Davide Paolo Bernasconi, Pietro Calcagno, Michele Paterno, Giovanni Ferrari","doi":"10.1007/s13304-025-02252-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) is considered the main trigger for further dangerous sequelae following pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). This study compared the short-term postoperative results of patients at increased risk of POPF undergoing pancreaticojejunal (PJ) anastomosis with and without internal biodegradable stent. Data from a prospectively collected database of patients undergoing PD at increased risk of POPF (ISGPS type B, C, D) between January 2017 and June 2023 were retrieved and analyzed, comparing the postoperative outcomes of those with and without an internal biodegradable stent, using a propensity score matching analysis. In the study period, 183 patients were selected. After matching, a total of 59 with stent (SG) and 59 without (NSG) were compared. The overall POPF rate was 21.2%. No difference was seen between the groups regarding POPF and other postoperative outcomes. A higher rate of biochemical leakage in the SG (53.1% vs 31.9%, p 0.033) was found among patients in the type D class of risk. The present study showed no significant difference in terms of 90-day overall, severe and pancreas-specific postoperative complications among patients at increased risk of POPF who received PJ anastomosis with and without internal biodegradable stent.</p>","PeriodicalId":23391,"journal":{"name":"Updates in Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Biodegradable internal stent versus no stent for patients at increased risk of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a single-center propensity score matching analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Michele Mazzola, Andrea Zironda, Alessandro Giani, Carlotta Bellomo, Davide Paolo Bernasconi, Pietro Calcagno, Michele Paterno, Giovanni Ferrari\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13304-025-02252-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) is considered the main trigger for further dangerous sequelae following pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). This study compared the short-term postoperative results of patients at increased risk of POPF undergoing pancreaticojejunal (PJ) anastomosis with and without internal biodegradable stent. Data from a prospectively collected database of patients undergoing PD at increased risk of POPF (ISGPS type B, C, D) between January 2017 and June 2023 were retrieved and analyzed, comparing the postoperative outcomes of those with and without an internal biodegradable stent, using a propensity score matching analysis. In the study period, 183 patients were selected. After matching, a total of 59 with stent (SG) and 59 without (NSG) were compared. The overall POPF rate was 21.2%. No difference was seen between the groups regarding POPF and other postoperative outcomes. A higher rate of biochemical leakage in the SG (53.1% vs 31.9%, p 0.033) was found among patients in the type D class of risk. The present study showed no significant difference in terms of 90-day overall, severe and pancreas-specific postoperative complications among patients at increased risk of POPF who received PJ anastomosis with and without internal biodegradable stent.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23391,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Updates in Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Updates in Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-025-02252-8\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Updates in Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-025-02252-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

术后胰瘘(POPF)被认为是胰十二指肠切除术(PD)后进一步危险后遗症的主要触发因素。本研究比较了在胰空肠(PJ)吻合术中使用和不使用生物可降解支架的高POPF风险患者的短期术后结果。从2017年1月至2023年6月期间前瞻性收集的POPF (ISGPS B, C, D型)风险增加的PD患者数据库中检索和分析数据,使用倾向评分匹配分析比较使用和不使用内部可生物降解支架的患者的术后结果。在研究期间,共选择了183例患者。配对后,将59例置入支架(SG)与59例未置入支架(NSG)进行比较。总POPF率为21.2%。两组之间在POPF和其他术后结果方面没有差异。D型风险患者的SG生化渗漏率更高(53.1% vs 31.9%, p 0.033)。本研究显示,在POPF风险增高的患者中,采用PJ吻合术与不采用生物可降解支架的患者在90天的总体并发症、严重并发症和胰腺特异性并发症方面均无显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Biodegradable internal stent versus no stent for patients at increased risk of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a single-center propensity score matching analysis.

Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) is considered the main trigger for further dangerous sequelae following pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). This study compared the short-term postoperative results of patients at increased risk of POPF undergoing pancreaticojejunal (PJ) anastomosis with and without internal biodegradable stent. Data from a prospectively collected database of patients undergoing PD at increased risk of POPF (ISGPS type B, C, D) between January 2017 and June 2023 were retrieved and analyzed, comparing the postoperative outcomes of those with and without an internal biodegradable stent, using a propensity score matching analysis. In the study period, 183 patients were selected. After matching, a total of 59 with stent (SG) and 59 without (NSG) were compared. The overall POPF rate was 21.2%. No difference was seen between the groups regarding POPF and other postoperative outcomes. A higher rate of biochemical leakage in the SG (53.1% vs 31.9%, p 0.033) was found among patients in the type D class of risk. The present study showed no significant difference in terms of 90-day overall, severe and pancreas-specific postoperative complications among patients at increased risk of POPF who received PJ anastomosis with and without internal biodegradable stent.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Updates in Surgery
Updates in Surgery Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
208
期刊介绍: Updates in Surgery (UPIS) has been founded in 2010 as the official journal of the Italian Society of Surgery. It’s an international, English-language, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the surgical sciences. Its main goal is to offer a valuable update on the most recent developments of those surgical techniques that are rapidly evolving, forcing the community of surgeons to a rigorous debate and a continuous refinement of standards of care. In this respect position papers on the mostly debated surgical approaches and accreditation criteria have been published and are welcome for the future. Beside its focus on general surgery, the journal draws particular attention to cutting edge topics and emerging surgical fields that are publishing in monothematic issues guest edited by well-known experts. Updates in Surgery has been considering various types of papers: editorials, comprehensive reviews, original studies and technical notes related to specific surgical procedures and techniques on liver, colorectal, gastric, pancreatic, robotic and bariatric surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信