前列腺癌-运动和二甲双胍随机对照可行性试验(Pre-EMpT)在积极监测、根治性前列腺切除术和放疗后的男性中进行。

IF 1.5 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Luke A Robles, Lucy McGeagh, Jonathan Aning, Amit Bahl, Amarnath Challapalli, Anthony Koupparis, Raj Persad, Edward Rowe, Constance Shiridzinomwa, Richard M Martin, J Athene Lane
{"title":"前列腺癌-运动和二甲双胍随机对照可行性试验(Pre-EMpT)在积极监测、根治性前列腺切除术和放疗后的男性中进行。","authors":"Luke A Robles, Lucy McGeagh, Jonathan Aning, Amit Bahl, Amarnath Challapalli, Anthony Koupparis, Raj Persad, Edward Rowe, Constance Shiridzinomwa, Richard M Martin, J Athene Lane","doi":"10.1186/s40814-025-01654-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Moderate to vigorous physical activity and metformin are associated in epidemiological studies with reduced biochemical recurrence and mortality in men with prostate cancer. This study assessed the feasibility of a home-based physical activity and/or metformin intervention in men with non-metastatic prostate cancer following radical treatment (surgery or radiotherapy) or active surveillance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 2 × 2 factorial design randomised men into one of four groups for 6 months: (1) physical activity (defined as brisk walking ≥ 30 min for ≥ 5 days per week, aiming for ≥ 10,000 steps a day); (2) metformin (one 500 mg slow-release tablet daily); (3) physical activity and metformin; and (4) control. Men were recruited from a single tertiary referral centre in the South West of England, UK, (September 2018-March 2020 which terminated slightly early due to the COVID-19 pandemic). Co-primary outcomes were rates of randomisation and adherence which was defined as men brisk walking ≥30 minutes on at least 5 days with 10,000 steps daily (measured over one week 6-months after randomisation) with ≥ 60% adherence to metformin between 3- and 6 months post-randomisation using returned pill count. Secondary outcomes included self-reported adverse events and physical activity, feasibility of wearing activity monitors and questionnaire completion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 295 men were eligible and 110 were randomised (37.3%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 31.8 to 43.1). Adherence to the physical activity and metformin interventions was 46.9% (95% CI 32.5 to 62.0) and 47.1% (95% CI 32.9 to 61.5) respectively. Adherence was > 60% for both the physical activity and metformin interventions on a complete case basis. Adverse events were infrequent (n = 7) across randomised groups. Completion of self-reported measures of physical activity, urinary incontinence, sexual function, quality of life and stages of change was over 80%. Step counts were not higher in men wearing activity monitors that alerted them about their step counts and sedentary behaviour. Retention over 6 months was 91.3% (95% CI 84.2 to 96.0). Follow up and intervention prompts were impacted by the pandemic.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Home-based physical activity and metformin interventions show some promise for men with prostate cancer following radical treatment or active surveillance.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ISRCTN, ISRCTN13543667. Registered 2 August 2018, https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN13543667.</p>","PeriodicalId":20176,"journal":{"name":"Pilot and Feasibility Studies","volume":"11 1","pages":"71"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12103774/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Prostate cancer-Exercise and Metformin randomised controlled feasibility Trial (Pre-EMpT) in men following active surveillance, radical prostatectomy and radiotherapy.\",\"authors\":\"Luke A Robles, Lucy McGeagh, Jonathan Aning, Amit Bahl, Amarnath Challapalli, Anthony Koupparis, Raj Persad, Edward Rowe, Constance Shiridzinomwa, Richard M Martin, J Athene Lane\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40814-025-01654-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Moderate to vigorous physical activity and metformin are associated in epidemiological studies with reduced biochemical recurrence and mortality in men with prostate cancer. This study assessed the feasibility of a home-based physical activity and/or metformin intervention in men with non-metastatic prostate cancer following radical treatment (surgery or radiotherapy) or active surveillance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 2 × 2 factorial design randomised men into one of four groups for 6 months: (1) physical activity (defined as brisk walking ≥ 30 min for ≥ 5 days per week, aiming for ≥ 10,000 steps a day); (2) metformin (one 500 mg slow-release tablet daily); (3) physical activity and metformin; and (4) control. Men were recruited from a single tertiary referral centre in the South West of England, UK, (September 2018-March 2020 which terminated slightly early due to the COVID-19 pandemic). Co-primary outcomes were rates of randomisation and adherence which was defined as men brisk walking ≥30 minutes on at least 5 days with 10,000 steps daily (measured over one week 6-months after randomisation) with ≥ 60% adherence to metformin between 3- and 6 months post-randomisation using returned pill count. Secondary outcomes included self-reported adverse events and physical activity, feasibility of wearing activity monitors and questionnaire completion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 295 men were eligible and 110 were randomised (37.3%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 31.8 to 43.1). Adherence to the physical activity and metformin interventions was 46.9% (95% CI 32.5 to 62.0) and 47.1% (95% CI 32.9 to 61.5) respectively. Adherence was > 60% for both the physical activity and metformin interventions on a complete case basis. Adverse events were infrequent (n = 7) across randomised groups. Completion of self-reported measures of physical activity, urinary incontinence, sexual function, quality of life and stages of change was over 80%. Step counts were not higher in men wearing activity monitors that alerted them about their step counts and sedentary behaviour. Retention over 6 months was 91.3% (95% CI 84.2 to 96.0). Follow up and intervention prompts were impacted by the pandemic.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Home-based physical activity and metformin interventions show some promise for men with prostate cancer following radical treatment or active surveillance.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ISRCTN, ISRCTN13543667. Registered 2 August 2018, https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN13543667.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20176,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pilot and Feasibility Studies\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"71\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12103774/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pilot and Feasibility Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40814-025-01654-0\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pilot and Feasibility Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40814-025-01654-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:流行病学研究表明,中度至剧烈运动和二甲双胍与降低前列腺癌男性生化复发和死亡率相关。本研究评估了在根治性治疗(手术或放疗)或主动监测后,以家庭为基础的体育活动和/或二甲双胍干预非转移性前列腺癌的可行性。方法:采用2 × 2因子设计,将男性随机分为四组,为期6个月:(1)身体活动(定义为每周≥5天,快走≥30分钟,目标是每天≥10,000步);(2)二甲双胍(每日一片,500 mg缓释片);(3)体育锻炼和二甲双胍;(4)控制。男性从英国英格兰西南部的一个三级转诊中心招募(2018年9月至2020年3月,由于COVID-19大流行而略微提前终止)。共同主要结局是随机化和依从性,其定义为男性快步行走≥30分钟,每天至少5天,每天10000步(随机化后6个月的一周内测量),随机化后3至6个月的二甲双胍依从性≥60%(使用返回药片计数)。次要结局包括自我报告的不良事件和身体活动、佩戴活动监测器的可行性和问卷完成情况。结果:共有295名男性符合条件,110名被随机分组(37.3%,95%可信区间[CI] 31.8至43.1)。体力活动和二甲双胍干预的依从性分别为46.9% (95% CI 32.5 ~ 62.0)和47.1% (95% CI 32.9 ~ 61.5)。在完整的病例基础上,身体活动和二甲双胍干预的依从性均为60%。在随机分组中,不良事件很少发生(n = 7)。自我报告的体力活动、尿失禁、性功能、生活质量和变化阶段的测量完成率超过80%。佩戴活动监测器的男性步数并没有增加,这些监测器会提醒他们步数和久坐行为。6个月以上的保留率为91.3% (95% CI 84.2至96.0)。后续行动和干预措施受到大流行的影响。结论:以家庭为基础的体育锻炼和二甲双胍干预对前列腺癌患者进行根治或积极监测后显示出一定的希望。试验注册:ISRCTN, ISRCTN13543667。2018年8月2日注册,https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN13543667。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Prostate cancer-Exercise and Metformin randomised controlled feasibility Trial (Pre-EMpT) in men following active surveillance, radical prostatectomy and radiotherapy.

Background: Moderate to vigorous physical activity and metformin are associated in epidemiological studies with reduced biochemical recurrence and mortality in men with prostate cancer. This study assessed the feasibility of a home-based physical activity and/or metformin intervention in men with non-metastatic prostate cancer following radical treatment (surgery or radiotherapy) or active surveillance.

Methods: A 2 × 2 factorial design randomised men into one of four groups for 6 months: (1) physical activity (defined as brisk walking ≥ 30 min for ≥ 5 days per week, aiming for ≥ 10,000 steps a day); (2) metformin (one 500 mg slow-release tablet daily); (3) physical activity and metformin; and (4) control. Men were recruited from a single tertiary referral centre in the South West of England, UK, (September 2018-March 2020 which terminated slightly early due to the COVID-19 pandemic). Co-primary outcomes were rates of randomisation and adherence which was defined as men brisk walking ≥30 minutes on at least 5 days with 10,000 steps daily (measured over one week 6-months after randomisation) with ≥ 60% adherence to metformin between 3- and 6 months post-randomisation using returned pill count. Secondary outcomes included self-reported adverse events and physical activity, feasibility of wearing activity monitors and questionnaire completion.

Results: In total, 295 men were eligible and 110 were randomised (37.3%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 31.8 to 43.1). Adherence to the physical activity and metformin interventions was 46.9% (95% CI 32.5 to 62.0) and 47.1% (95% CI 32.9 to 61.5) respectively. Adherence was > 60% for both the physical activity and metformin interventions on a complete case basis. Adverse events were infrequent (n = 7) across randomised groups. Completion of self-reported measures of physical activity, urinary incontinence, sexual function, quality of life and stages of change was over 80%. Step counts were not higher in men wearing activity monitors that alerted them about their step counts and sedentary behaviour. Retention over 6 months was 91.3% (95% CI 84.2 to 96.0). Follow up and intervention prompts were impacted by the pandemic.

Conclusion: Home-based physical activity and metformin interventions show some promise for men with prostate cancer following radical treatment or active surveillance.

Trial registration: ISRCTN, ISRCTN13543667. Registered 2 August 2018, https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN13543667.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pilot and Feasibility Studies
Pilot and Feasibility Studies Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
5.90%
发文量
241
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: Pilot and Feasibility Studies encompasses all aspects of the design, conduct and reporting of pilot and feasibility studies in biomedicine. The journal publishes research articles that are intended to directly influence future clinical trials or large scale observational studies, as well as protocols, commentaries and methodology articles. The journal also ensures that the results of all well-conducted, peer-reviewed, pilot and feasibility studies are published, regardless of outcome or significance of findings. Pilot and feasibility studies are increasingly conducted prior to a full randomized controlled trial. However, these studies often lack clear objectives, many remain unpublished, and there is confusion over the meanings of the words “pilot” and “feasibility”. Pilot and Feasibility Studies provides a forum for discussion around this key aspect of the scientific process, and seeks to ensure that these studies are published, so as to complete the publication thread for clinical research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信